It was in the news at the timeWtf where did you get thus info from?
Attachments
-
51.2 KB
It was in the news at the timeWtf where did you get thus info from?
Beverley allit was! Not LLWtf where did you get thus info from?
If a lawyer had to divulge that someone had admitted guilt to them then no one would do that unless they wanted to plead guilty. They would just lie to their lawyer.This is a broken record. I know everyone has the right to a fair trial, we all know that. Saying I don't know how someone could defend a *known* murderer isn't denying that. Plus, there isn't anything fair about trying to get someone off when you KNOW they did it. I do think we should have a system where if someone admits guilt to their lawyer that's as good as a trial.
I couldn't stand there and defend a baby murderer. I would think most can't. Lawyers are a different breed.
Im my experience, our ward manager very rarely left her office and worked mon to Fri 9-5.Thank you for this- food for thought.
Who would be the person who would look over the ‘who was where and around’ each time? Would it be a manager of some sorts? Could the lack of staffing meant that she was essentially with a new team each time it happened, and potentially a team of agency staff? Could the day to day management bit have been short staffed and have had agency workers plugging the gaps? So in effect, the department is just reacting to each crisis as a single event rather than anyone having a more birds eye view of any patterns/who’s involved? And who would that person who should have a birds eye view be? Annnnd, who was it eventually?
Such a state. So extremely sad.
Actually, also, could that be a defence? ‘It was X’s job to make sureno one was going around unstopped attacking babiesthese alledged incidents were being seen as a whole, you can’t blame LL for your failings?’
Motive is handy when deciding if someone is guilty but it's not reliable. And as you say, sometimes there is no motive.There will be plenty of examples of there being no motive at all. It doesn’t matter why in my opinion if she did it she did it, it won’t bring them back.
Where are you seeing these pics?taken from the note she said “i dont deserve mum and dad, matt & tom” if we assume matt and tom are her brothers of half brothers seeing as her dad is 17 ish years older than her mum they could be from her fathers previous relationship. If you search a family member there are a matt and a tom with different surnames who look exactly like LL like male versions of her ! Also one of those ‘brothers’ has a child born roughly 2013 , could she of got jealous of all the attention the child was getting, she was no longer the youngest of the family, the child looks pretty doted on so by time the child was 1-2yo would be when she started this. something in her life triggered it as she worked there a while before it started.
Being a witness wasn’t optional in my friends case. She had to turn up or she would be in contempt of court and, ultimately, could be remanded in custody.I’ve wondered whether all parents think she is guilty, because like you say it wasn’t the parents that ‘pressed charges’ so it’s possible they could believe she’s innocent and it was hospital negligence.
I don’t know how much info they are given pre-trial, I guess very likely anything specific to their own baby, but the note for example? Would they have all expected that especially the way the prosecution delivered it. I know that has created a lot of debate here so I’m wondering how the parents take it, 17 babies, potentially 34 parents - if you got 34 tattlers there would definitely be a mix of opinions. Or whether if you are told by police they believe your child was murdered you tend to believe it’s true.
I am wondering if any of the parents are going to be witnesses. Prosecution have mentioned some of the mums accounts in particular that differ to Lucy’s. It would be incredibly hard but if I thought my child was murdered and I was a potential witness then I would put myself through it for justice for my baby. Is being a witness optional?
I thought people could decline to be a witness, even in a criminal trial? Even LL isn't compelled to take the stand and I suspect she might not in this trial.Being a witness wasn’t optional in my friends case. She had to turn up or it would be in contempt of court and, ultimately, could be remanded in custody.
I’m sure I read somewhere it’s been confirmed already she won’t take the stand?I thought people could decline to be a witness, even in a criminal trial? Even LL isn't compelled to take the stand and I suspect she might not in this trial.
Quoting myself as I've just googled it and apparently you have no choice. As much as I hate to use this as my reference point, in most TV crime shows, they nearly always have witnesses refusing to take the stand and nearly causing the case to collapse before they miraculously persuade them to at the end. I know not real life, but always gave me the impression that you could just refuseI thought people could decline to be a witness, even in a criminal trial? Even LL isn't compelled to take the stand and I suspect she might not in this trial.
Nope you can be summond, attendance in compulsory. You can be a reluctant witness the prosecution/ defence can work around that with the questions they ask.I thought people could decline to be a witness, even in a criminal trial? Even LL isn't compelled to take the stand and I suspect she might not in this trial.
I had to have a medical termination at 24wks as my baby was incompatible with life and he was classed as a stillbirth when he was bornAs someone with no children, can stillbirths be caused by outside factors? I don’t know much about pregnancy etc.
That’s what happened to my friend. She’d already given statements and the perpetrator was remanded in custody so maybe because it had progressed to that stage.I thought people could decline to be a witness, even in a criminal trial? Even LL isn't compelled to take the stand and I suspect she might not in this trial.
She’s not an expert witness she is the accused,Nope you can be summond, attendance in compulsory. You can be a reluctant witness the prosecution/ defence can work around that with the questions they ask.
Lucy can decline as can expert witnesses
No I mean the expert witnesses can decline aswell, sorry poor wording. Typing while cookingThat’s what happened to my friend. She’d already given statements and the perpetrator was remanded in custody so maybe because it had progressed to that stage.
No, LL doesn’t have to take the stand but she is not a witness, she is the accused. Often defence barristers will advise their clients not to take the stand as they’re not going to do themselves any favours.
She’s not an expert witness she is the accused,
I’m so sorry you experienced thisI had to have a medical termination at 24wks as my baby was incompatible with life and he was classed as a stillbirth when he was born
because I had read up to when they found out she had a grievanceTo the people who think she’s innocent, or who are currently swaying that way- what would make you switch to guilty? What do you think the jurors want if they’re to find her guilty? Because it’s sounds like there are a lot of folk who want to see CCTV of Lucy Letby pumping babies full of insulin or smothering them whilst screaming ‘I’m killing them because I’m plain evil’ before they’re willing to find her guilty!?
I was a NICU baby. My mum said the nurses and doctors were the most gracious, selfless and caring people she'd ever met. Over 30 years later and she still remembers my nurses and doctors names.Finding it hard to keep up with this thread. I have caught up with live feed though and will dip in and out of this. But can I just say and it’s probably been said. I hope this case doesn’t take away (I doubt it does) the fact that Nicu nurses are actual angels sent from heaven. And without the constant care from them for my little girl, she wouldn’t be here right now. They saved my baby’s life on several occasions, and were also there for me. I feel forever thankfulI hope the parents of these precious angels get the closure and justice that is so truly deserved.
I think there has been some confusion somewhere. It's not Lucy who was godmother to someone. Beverley Allitt befriended the parents of one of the babies she murdered and ended up being godmother to that child's surviving twin.Wtf where did you get thus info from?
A maternity clinical risk manager. All neonatal deaths / stillbirths / adverse outcomes in maternity are investigated internally, and hospitals have a clinical risk office to do it. To put it into context, my hospital delivers about 2500 babies a year (which is quite a small hospital) and has a risk office that has 3/4 staff (4 staff, but not all full time). Most of te review takes place from the clinical notes. The majority of internal investigations find that actually due procedures were followed. Sometimes they find things that can improve practice, or that someone needs more training, or there was a genuine error somewhere.Thank you for this- food for thought.
Who would be the person who would look over the ‘who was where and around’ each time? Would it be a manager of some sorts? Could the lack of staffing meant that she was essentially with a new team each time it happened, and potentially a team of agency staff? Could the day to day management bit have been short staffed and have had agency workers plugging the gaps? So in effect, the department is just reacting to each crisis as a single event rather than anyone having a more birds eye view of any patterns/who’s involved? And who would that person who should have a birds eye view be? Annnnd, who was it eventually?
Such a state. So extremely sad.
Actually, also, could that be a defence? ‘It was X’s job to make sureno one was going around unstopped attacking babiesthese alledged incidents were being seen as a whole, you can’t blame LL for your failings?’