I think a lot of people actually do think, even subconsciously, that it's better for an innocent person to go to prison wrongly than to risk a guilty one going free. As a juror you cannot rely on what your "gut instinct" is telling you. That isn't good enough. You have to look, objectively, at the evidence and ask if it shows you beyond a reasonable doubt that this person definitely committed the crime they are accused of. If it doesn't then you HAVE to find not guilty. It's worrying how many people don't understand that.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Lol no, what?
That is my professional experience with them
My experience isn't in murder, but other serious crime whereby they seldom provide passwords or use encro-chat.
Me too.
She is clearly fit for trail, but if doesn't mean she don't have some sort of mental problems. I'm wondering how her psychiatric report look like.
I follow one of the forensic psychiatrist- Dr Sohom Das. He have yt channel (psych for the sore minds) where he discuss a number of cases and explain how psychiatric evaluation look like etc
I hope so once we have more informations he will discuss LL case too. I found his channel very informative and interesting.
He did!
And I must say, Mark Dowling's reporting has been excellent so far.
He’s probably used to it isn’t he, this is basically his job now speaking in court. He’s probably has many Ben Meyers questioning his expertise over the years.
Somebody needs to tell him he’s not allowed any annual leave for the next six months otherwise we might get Brad in replacement.
If I recall correctly Savannah Brockhill wouldn’t allow access to her social media so they didn’t have any of it for the trial?Lol no, what?
That is my professional experience with them
My experience isn't in murder, but other serious crime whereby they seldom provide passwords or use encro-chat.
Defo. It’s a really horrible part of the job though. My family member has been doing this over live link all day and just asked to come round to see my kids cos she needs some hugs. bleeping badass in front of them going at her but it’s tough going. I liked the cut of his jib from what I read- serving it straight back!
I give a lot a grace to human nature, something horrific happens we need someone to blame, anger and emotion will take over and we demand justice (rightly so)
What worries me how many people don't consider that if the wrong person goes to jail, they don't realise that the guilty party still walks free. There is no justice in that
Brad was very good wasn't he. It felt like we were practically reading the transcripts verbatim.
Mark is doing good though, he's covering quite a lot of info and leaving some of the less relevant bits (like jury watching videos about machinery) nicely short and concise.
It was Dave Jagger that did the really good reporting, then he had a day off and we got Brad and it all went to tit
orite? Bless him. He did his best but we were pleased when we got Dave back I wonder what she raised a grievance about and when?
Ah yes it wasIt was Dave Jagger that did the really good reporting, then he had a day off and we got Brad and it all went to tit
I'd completely forgotten about orite...I think he even took some stick on twitter for that and took it in good graceThe expert witness isn’t on trial here. He did do a good job of not being undermined however he has been doing the job since what 2007.
Although, just thinking out loud here how much of an expert can he be if he hasn’t even used an IntelliVue. Im not trying to discredit any of his work (obviously very intelligent and respected in his field) I’m just surprised they haven’t gone with a consultant neonatologist instead of a paediatrician where the majority of his work on the neonatal unit seemed to be 30/40 years ago.
Although, just thinking out loud here how much of an expert can he be if he hasn’t even used an IntelliVue. Im not trying to discredit any of his work (obviously very intelligent and respected in his field) I’m just surprised they haven’t gone with a consultant neonatologist instead of a paediatrician where the majority of his work on the neonatal unit seemed to be 30/40 years ago.
I believe they had the encrypted data from snapchat, but I don't recall any other social media evidence no. If it wasn't logged in on the phone and she wouldn't disclose the password then they normally can't access it.
I suppose say they can’t prove it beyond reasonable doubt, if she is still guilty but walks free at least she’ll unlikely even be near children again? Not much but I guess it’s something
To be fair, I imagine some units might use a different make of machine but I assume in life saving equipment like hospital monitors that they all have to be of an exact standard and do the same thing. They are all just alarming when parameters are breached, so as long as he understands that, the make of the machine isn't really relevant
Well if she's found not guilty then on what basis would they be able to stop her ever being near children again?I suppose say they can’t prove it beyond reasonable doubt, if she is still guilty but walks free at least she’ll unlikely even be near children again? Not much but I guess it’s something
I suppose if it was her incompetence that killed them then yes, but that would then be manslaughter.
Surely no one would ever employ her in a caregiving role again? Rightly or wrongly Mud sticks
Yes you are probably right there. I think I’m just thinking about the little details a bit too much. Lots to take in isn’t there.
- Status