Quick analysis of the Twitter rant from last week:
She must be sad: Most people would have moments of sadness if they were mostly estranged from their older kids, and only spent part of their time with their youngest, leaving them with hours of unfulfilling time alone.
She must be lonely: Most people would feel lonely at times if their offspring were missing from their lives for most of the time, and after all their exciting affairs with other people's husbands they are facing their 50's alone. Occasional loneliness in those circumstances would be normal.
She must be jealous: Most people would have pangs of jealousy if they had thought they were the saviour of their former partner, only for him to leave the relationship for a younger, more stable, together and inspirational woman.
She must be bitter: Anybody who counts - and publishes - the cost of what they spent on a partner is demonstrating their bitterness for all to see. Being that bitter is not normal. The evidence of her bitterness and rage is there for all to see, written by her own hand.
She must be desperate by now: Anybody who pretends to have jobs they don't, hints at relationships which don't exist, and tags z-list slebs into their inane, fantasy SM posts is demonstrating their desperation. Desperation oozes from her posts.
She must be yearning for love: There is nothing wrong with yearning for love. It's a normal human emotion.
She must be filled with regret: Most people who look back on leaving a stable marriage and three children for an ultimately failed relationship with a jobless alcoholic (who cost them over £25K) would be filled with regret. That would be completely normal.
She must be lost: The evidence of her deluded SM posting shows just how lost she is. She doesn't know who or what she is from one day to the next. It's there in front of our eyes, written by her own hand.
She must be mad: The deluded posts she makes on SM are ample evidence that she has some serious mental health/behavioural issues. The word 'mad' is out of favour in these more enlightened times, but Liz Fraser definitely presents as having MH issues. The evidence is there, in her SM posts, and the choices she has made in her adult life.
She must be embarrassed: Most people would not conduct themselves - repeatedly - in the way LF does, but if they had made just one of the life-choices Liz has made over the last decade or more I think most people would be beyond embarrassed. It would be perfectly normal and reasonable to feel embarrassment at multiple extra-marital affairs, abandoning kids to chase an unemployed alcoholic around Europe. To not feel any embarrassment would be way beyond normal human emotion.
She must be trying to hard to look happy: Her posts attest to this. One minute she is HAPPEEEEEEE, the next she is reflecting back on the trauma 'behind the squares' from the times she posts her happy claims. It's there in front of our eyes. She documents it for all to see.
She must have no friends: She may spend short bursts of time schmoozing people who she thinks might be useful to her, but there has never been any suggestion of any enduring friendships in the way most of us think of them. No evidence of give and take. A shoulder to cry on in an airport baggage lounge is not a friend, and neither is a startled looking school-gate-mum on some faux amazing wine drinking evening by the river.
She must be unlovable: Nobody is completely unlovable, but there are so many red flags where LF is concerned that only another narcissist or a complete naive fool would ever contemplate losing their heart to her. And children tend to love their parents no matter what.
too busy filled with commoners for the likes of our Lizzie!