Possibly controversial here but maternity leave.
I feel it has got to the stage where women are now totally taking the utter piss. A colleague had her first baby (genuinely pleased for her) then took a year off then came back part time and then handed in her notice as soon as she could. She got a new job and has just announced that she is pregnant again with her second. So she was pregnant at interview stage. So now, this company has hired someone who will be out of action for potentially a year in order to support her maternity leave.
To be fair, if she was pregnant at interview she probably won’t be entitled to maternity leave pay as she won’t have been with them for long enough in the qualifying period. I
think she’ll be maternity allowance which isn’t paid by the company and she’d have been entitled to anyway. (It’ll depend on her dates but very likely) Also, you don’t get paid for a whole year, you’re just entitled to take a year without jeopardising your job. If you take the basic leave (26 weeks) you’re entitled to the same job and conditions but if you take over this, up to a year, they just have to give you
a job with no less favourable conditions. Really all the company is in for is giving her a job at some point in the future and the hassle of re-recruiting. She hasn’t really gained anything but a little job security, but she could have to go back to a totally different
She’d have probably been better off staying with the first company so while I understand your irritation in general, she hasn’t got it as good as you think she has in the least.