He changes his mind as often as he changes his clothes and “gender” so last I saw he was but who knows!Oh God, really?
He changes his mind as often as he changes his clothes and “gender” so last I saw he was but who knows!Oh God, really?
Exactly. A lot of people in this thread have said for ages that the pivoting to trans rights from Stonewall was a strictly financial and to stay relevant move. Unfortunately for them (or perhaps, in spite of?) this directly clashed with gay rights, rendering their whole organisation as pointless, uninformed and redundant.Good article
View attachment 2868955How charities and the internet fuelled ten-year rise of gender transition
The landmark report on gender services by Dr Hilary Cass arrived a decade after girls’ referrals began to soarwww.thetimes.co.uk
Tbh after their 2022 post I don't feel sorry for them at all. The damage they've done to the LGB community pedalling crap like that.Exactly. A lot of people in this thread have said for ages that the pivoting to trans rights from Stonewall was a strictly financial and to stay relevant move. Unfortunately for them (or perhaps, in spite of?) this directly clashed with gay rights, rendering their whole organisation as pointless, uninformed and redundant.
The laughable latest thing is now the loud and prominent TRAs have publicly turned against Stonewall, because Stonewall published a post saying they accept and find some agreements within the Cass report.
View attachment 2869443
thanks for posting the link, I’ll read it fully later, but the small screenshot alone reminded me of when an organisation (the NHS? Doubtful though…) published a report saying children are never born in the wrong bodies and then Mermaids tweeted they thought so too and always agreed with that, and then got multiple replies from multiple users that had evidence from multiple sources where Mermaids, historically, had said the exact opposite and claimed children could and were born in incorrect bodies.Tbh after their 2022 post I don't feel sorry for them at all. The damage they've done to the LGB community pedalling crap like that.
Haven’t read yet but will later but I already know it will be about Stonewall letting down gay people and abandoning it’s original remit in exchange for further funding by highlighting and promoting lying about a transgender concept, even though parts ofLet down by an organisation set up to protect LGB
Thread by @Jebadoo2 on Thread Reader App
@Jebadoo2: 1/ When gay children abandoned to gender needed Stonewall to stand up for them, Ruth Hunt wasn't even absent from her post, it was worse than that. She conspired against them, joined and led enemy forces...…threadreaderapp.com
i honestly hope that OP and the response is a joke and trolling. If they’re both serious…then my Lord.Just seen some of the stuff, same sex attracted people have been told.
View attachment 2872468View attachment 2872469View attachment 2872470
View attachment 2872471
All from this website, this is category 5 of 7
TERF is a slur
Documenting the abuse, harassment and misogyny of transgender identity politicsterfisaslur.com
Ive read the Times article now. There’s no point of me even quoting the relevant parts, they’re all relevant. I cannot believe the absolute cheek and DARVO that Stonewall are trying to pull here. I really don’t understand how some peoples minds work…do they really think, especially in 2024, nobody has the ability to look online and see blatant lies are being told?Let down by an organisation set up to protect LGB
Thread by @Jebadoo2 on Thread Reader App
@Jebadoo2: 1/ When gay children abandoned to gender needed Stonewall to stand up for them, Ruth Hunt wasn't even absent from her post, it was worse than that. She conspired against them, joined and led enemy forces...…threadreaderapp.com
I believe it was TRA Juno Dawson who made a similar comment: That gay men being gay is a consolation prize for not being brave enough to come out as a trans woman.Couple from twitter
Interesting this was reported as far back as 1996. I agree with it, especially the last parts. I’ve always said: if you agree that people’s sexuality is something that they’re born with and can’t then, then you cannot realistically think of transgenderism as as real because the two directly contradict each other.[/QUOTE]this is from 1996, also tweeted by gay not queer
View attachment 2881171
“You lived through gay conversion 2.0”Another from twitter
“They’re seeking and found their own political power”That opinion piece in the NYT from 1996 was interesting and shows how far back the issues go. I thought I’d look out the original article to which the guy was responding and found it here:
Shunning 'He' and 'She,' They Fight for Respect (Published 1996)
Nascent 'transgender' movement, representing transsexuals, cross-dressers, intersexed people (hermaphrodites), womanish men, mannish women and others whose sexual identity is blurred, is beginning to fight for respect and legal protections; members hold they are last pariahs in society more...www.nytimes.com
From the article:
View attachment 2881423
View attachment 2881431
Alison Laing is a classic example of an AGP. Calls himself a woman’s name and yet is married to a woman and is a father. He says, “we don’t have to live in gender boxes”. No we don’t, but you can be gender non-conforming without saying you’re a member of the opposite sex.
That second tweet is sad, and shocking. The first tweet, well I’ve always thought JC to be a bit of an idiot so no surprise from me on that.Couple from twitter
This is exactly what I said a while back on here, that the inclusion of the T and especially the Q+ has turned the so-called “umbrella” into a free for all for anyone that doesn’t feel like identifying as straight. Even if they are straight.Just seen (mentions lgb who are affected)
Thread by @berk_hamstead on Thread Reader App
@berk_hamstead: The myth of the "trans community". The trans community is not a coherent community at all. It is an inexplicably broad demographic containing both vulnerable and dangerous people. Here's my attempt t...…threadreaderapp.com
This is what I think as well. I believe the behaviour of the TRAs has made some people associate this behaviour with anyone who is LGB and is partly responsible for the rise in homophobia. People don’t bother to discern which factions of the LGBTQIA+ are pushing puberty blockers or wanting to abolish single-sex spaces; anyone who is part of the ‘community’ is fair game for criticism (or worse).The ripple effect that “Adding the T” has caused to society on a global scale has been absolute madness and I don’t only just fear, but now fully expect the entire group to get backlash. The entire LGBTQ+ group.
Some are, and some (eg Tatchell) are doubling down and are calling for protests against the findings of the Cass report, even though it focuses solely on children and young people.we’ve already seen major players who were responsible for some of the worst parts in this whole thing self identifying themselves as having had nothing/little to ever do with it.
He was a great constituency MP and used to really back the local workforce (of which I was one ) and minority groups who experienced discrimination. I supported him to become Labour leader and was ecstatic when he won, but the scales fell from my eyes when it was obvious he couldn’t define a woman. Just disillusioned with the whole lot of them tbh.That second tweet is sad, and shocking. The first tweet, well I’ve always thought JC to be a bit of an idiot so no surprise from me on that.