I'm aware of the old formula Disney used when they extended insurance coverage to partners during Eisner's days as head of the company, in the days before marriage equality.
Since then, and the steps and formulas vary wildly around the country and in different states, in many, if not most, proof of cohabitation has to be presented to the company to "apply" for coverage to a cohabitating 'partner' today____ in the long overdue day when same sex couples can marry.
I have no way of knowing, but is Disney as generous toady? Could she apply for coverage for that grifting loser and have him added to her insurance UNLESS they demonstrate they live together and are a committed couple? ___ That almost makes me LOL, because he still crawls into that BroHostel pig sty with the other two men. She lives with other members of her family? ___ Again, it's puzzling.
This may be the kicker. He'll certainly WANT to be on her policy to extend his medical benefits and greatly lower any if not all costs to him. Winning! Even if she were to want to leave him, and she's shown no signs of that, quite the contrary, he'll want to keep her if for that insurance benefit alone.
"Marry me! I need health coverage and then I'll have more money, especially when what's yours is mine as well!"
Hell, that moonface, dowdy, desperate doormat seems so smitten with her Hairy Munchkin YT 'star,' she may be the one to pop the question:
View attachment 2057283 __________View attachment 2057293 EYE accept!
overload just looking at the title and his pinned comment.
"
