It is really sad! When they read this they’ll probably say “well you all sit on tattle talking about”, there’s a big difference between writing posts and sitting on tiktok live all day letting this situation consume you. Hating L&B isn’t a personality trait
FACTS
I work 12 hours a day and scroll on here to see what utter shite that lot has to say its painful to see grown arse adults behaving like they do. I'm really blessed with my lifeIt is really sad! When they read this they’ll probably say “well you all sit on tattle talking about”, there’s a big difference between writing posts and sitting on tiktok live all day letting this situation consume you. Hating L&B isn’t a personality trait
england.shelter.org.uk
It is all very confusingCan I just asked why does the shelter website say this I'm confused I'm sorry
Who can apply for an IPNA
Only the following bodies can apply for a housing-related IPNA:
- local authority
- private registered provider of social housing (PRPSH)
- charitable housing trust
- housing action trust
- police
Power to grant injunctions
An injunction to prevent nuisance or annoyance (IPNA) is also known a Part 1 injunction.
a person has engaged, or threatens to engage, in antisocial behaviour, and
it is just and convenient to grant the injunction for the purpose of preventing that person from engaging in antisocial behaviour
Interim injunctions and 'without notice' applications
An interim IPNA can be granted pending a final hearing in order to prevent further antisocial behaviour during proceedings. In exceptional or urgent cases, for example where it is necessary to stop serious harm to victims, an interim injunction can be applied for 'without notice' to the alleged perpetrator.
An interim injunction made following a 'without notice' application can only include prohibitions, and not positive requirements.
Shelter Legal England - Injunctions to prevent nuisance or annoyance - Shelter England
Police or any social landlord can apply for an injunction to prevent nuisance or annoyance (IPNA) to stop antisocial behaviour of any person aged 10 or over.
I repeat I'm not trying to be argumentative I'm just so confused
Ipna is granted until a final hearing by the Courts. It is NOT a final INJUNCTION, you cannot ban a person or persons from social media which is what mazza is stating.Can I just asked why does the shelter website say this I'm confused I'm sorry
Who can apply for an IPNA
Only the following bodies can apply for a housing-related IPNA:
- local authority
- private registered provider of social housing (PRPSH)
- charitable housing trust
- housing action trust
- police
Power to grant injunctions
An injunction to prevent nuisance or annoyance (IPNA) is also known a Part 1 injunction.
a person has engaged, or threatens to engage, in antisocial behaviour, and
it is just and convenient to grant the injunction for the purpose of preventing that person from engaging in antisocial behaviour
Interim injunctions and 'without notice' applications
An interim IPNA can be granted pending a final hearing in order to prevent further antisocial behaviour during proceedings. In exceptional or urgent cases, for example where it is necessary to stop serious harm to victims, an interim injunction can be applied for 'without notice' to the alleged perpetrator.
An interim injunction made following a 'without notice' application can only include prohibitions, and not positive requirements.
Shelter Legal England - Injunctions to prevent nuisance or annoyance - Shelter England
Police or any social landlord can apply for an injunction to prevent nuisance or annoyance (IPNA) to stop antisocial behaviour of any person aged 10 or over.
I repeat I'm not trying to be argumentative I'm just so confused
How I see it is, there's no evidence of L & B going to court so an injunction I believe hasn't been made. What's to say that L made it up to get the sympathy vote or Mazza and that are just saying it to cause drama. Voice notes that Mazza has played can be doctored, and listening to them, you can clearly see it's been edited. Now my local council has stated to me when I asked them about it, that they can not impose an injunction to ban their tenants from social media, they can advise to stay off social media as much as possible but not put an order in place of a permanent ban....And why only ban her off TT??? They can however put a curfew in place to keep the disturbance down. What people fail to forget it there is loads of proof all over TT where all these bullies goad L&B to kick off. So if this injunction is true, L can easily win the appeal to have it lifted. 90% of what's come out of the bullies mouths have been proven to be false before.. so I would take what Mazza and Kat has said with a pinch of salt until there is solid proof.Can I just asked why does the shelter website say this I'm confused I'm sorry
Who can apply for an IPNA
Only the following bodies can apply for a housing-related IPNA:
- local authority
- private registered provider of social housing (PRPSH)
- charitable housing trust
- housing action trust
- police
Power to grant injunctions
An injunction to prevent nuisance or annoyance (IPNA) is also known a Part 1 injunction.
a person has engaged, or threatens to engage, in antisocial behaviour, and
it is just and convenient to grant the injunction for the purpose of preventing that person from engaging in antisocial behaviour
Interim injunctions and 'without notice' applications
An interim IPNA can be granted pending a final hearing in order to prevent further antisocial behaviour during proceedings. In exceptional or urgent cases, for example where it is necessary to stop serious harm to victims, an interim injunction can be applied for 'without notice' to the alleged perpetrator.
An interim injunction made following a 'without notice' application can only include prohibitions, and not positive requirements.
Shelter Legal England - Injunctions to prevent nuisance or annoyance - Shelter England
Police or any social landlord can apply for an injunction to prevent nuisance or annoyance (IPNA) to stop antisocial behaviour of any person aged 10 or over.
I repeat I'm not trying to be argumentative I'm just so confused
how are they heroes? Just as bunch of sad people sat on TT all day everyday looking for attention and validation! Oh and gifts!
That’s a very good point actuallyId also like to add that the whole nat thing and the rogue acc if the others had control of that account why have they not shown messages and screen recordings? Why have they not shown they have that acc on their lists of accs?? I personally feel that nat did it all and the others are helping her so she doesnt get trolled. What have they gained from this rogue acc?? Im proper confused on it tbh??
They tell people not to watch, gift mod for lucy but they are allowed to?? Hows that work?? Kat maz rubes nat does this mean your all fair game to be doxed and trolled like you do to others that have done the same for lucy?? You all contradict each other. Maz u need to get out into the real world and stop with ur orders of whos allowed in lives cos they are a "lucy lover/gifter" well u better block urself, kat, rubes and nat as you are all lucy lovers too
it’s all so backwards
imagine how many potential cases have been ruined as a result.No I'm afraid not I needed the space for the more frequent followers
They forced her to make a video??So the wax melt lady is still getting tit for selling to Lucy even after they forced her to make a public video saying she won't sell to her. Is that lot for real???? How more people are they going to force to make videos or public apologies. I don't know who they think they are but I hope they meet their match at some point and get took down a peg or two! It's complete madness. Can you imagine this in the real world
Bet that wasn't took lightly
Sadly yep they did. They told her to make it public so that it could be seen. Not the first time they've done this to someone. They think they're Mi5 it's pathetic!They forced her to make a video??
Bet that wasn't took lightly
Probably for the best
No that's a good thing! She tends to ban people she doesn't like
Mazz then said when she is live and someone is blocked she doesn't get it across her screen so has no idea. 5 minutes later...."Oh Kats in, someone just got blocked." Thought you don't get the blocked notification across the screen? 
