The state of her boob
Geez! The sheer difference in the size and shape of themView attachment 2786098
The bottom of Grant looks like the pastry lid on an uncooked apple pie.
I bet the poor sods in the room next to them didn't feel the same way! Didn't skanky say someone had been and complained about the noise they were making? And that was BEFORE they went out and got sozzled!The Neath hotel posted this below, then had to limit comments and delete most of them as they were so badThey‘ve left a couple up from the #BeKind fans though.
When will people learn that any support for Skank, or using her as promotion will generate an immense amount of negativity. She is hated, and for good reasons, a drunk driver, a bankrupt not paying her debts, yet living a millionaire lifestyle, has stolen her two youngest children from their father and refused him access to them, her behaviour in public is abhorrent, a washed-up has-been, still trying to live off her celebrity status 20 years ago. A foul-mouthed drunk andaddled waste of space, more and more members of the public are seeing this, yet still we get this support of her, a support that will just bring you condemnation. Read the headlines people, you do not want to be associated with this woeful human, heavy criticism comes with her in abundance now, you gonna get badly burnt on SM
Gee, still these companies, organisations, clubs, hotels etc just don’t get it, and are surprised by the bad publicity she will bring them. I guess everyone is just a Troll though, not telling it as it is
View attachment 2785960
Here I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. It’s to do with her original bankruptcy as it’s 19-1040 number so it’s her 2019 bankruptcy that she’s still undischarged from. It’s some sort of “application” and someone has posted details of “respondents” although I can’t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine it’s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Don’t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then it’s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I can’t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasn’t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasn’t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasn’t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasn’t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then haven’t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you don’t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies won’t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even I’m stumped on that one. Either way she’s a shower of shite. I’d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasn’t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry it’s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. XYes, come back Schmooze. I can only think the latest HMRC announcement and this court date are connected but not sure how. I would love to think her house is being divvied up finally or it's turning criminal but maybe not.
Thanks Schmooze. So, could tomorrow’s hearing be a winding up of the first bankruptcy to join it to the second? Looking at her assets (no not those ones!), I guessing that there will not be any money to pay HMRC let alone the other creditors, so would they amalgamate the claims?Here I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. It’s to do with her original bankruptcy as it’s 19-1040 number so it’s her 2019 bankruptcy that she’s still undischarged from. It’s some sort of “application” and someone has posted details of “respondents” although I can’t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine it’s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Don’t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then it’s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I can’t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasn’t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasn’t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasn’t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasn’t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then haven’t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you don’t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies won’t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even I’m stumped on that one. Either way she’s a shower of shite. I’d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasn’t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry it’s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. X
Sounds like @twaddle88 is only about 20 minutes from me.@twaddle88 I know now. I'm *ept*n . Just up the road.
Price is a whore, just to stay on topic
It's probably the first time she seen it tbh, it's not like she can look down to see and she's not one to be looking in the mirror at herself. Don't forget most people are so shocked at how normal and like one of us she isGeez! The sheer difference in the size and shape of them- did she actually bother looking before allowing the photo to be published? Also it looks with the shadowing on the shorts, that she has wet herself there!
Love it when you post SchmoozeHere I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. It’s to do with her original bankruptcy as it’s 19-1040 number so it’s her 2019 bankruptcy that she’s still undischarged from. It’s some sort of “application” and someone has posted details of “respondents” although I can’t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine it’s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Don’t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then it’s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I can’t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasn’t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasn’t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasn’t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasn’t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then haven’t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you don’t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies won’t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even I’m stumped on that one. Either way she’s a shower of shite. I’d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasn’t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry it’s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. X
That's great, thanks Schmooze! If there was an investigation for the original bankruptcy and an investigation by HMRC would they work together do you know? Or would that not happen? I've been hoping a bit too much two teams of fraud investigators are on to herHere I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. It’s to do with her original bankruptcy as it’s 19-1040 number so it’s her 2019 bankruptcy that she’s still undischarged from. It’s some sort of “application” and someone has posted details of “respondents” although I can’t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine it’s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Don’t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then it’s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I can’t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasn’t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasn’t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasn’t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasn’t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then haven’t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you don’t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies won’t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even I’m stumped on that one. Either way she’s a shower of shite. I’d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasn’t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry it’s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. X
I'm sorry but that a nob head, seriously. I just can't take him seriously. Hes another on playing dangerous mind game's. F#£ked up the lot of them are.View attachment 2785589
Carols back to posting on his grid
But I bet only Kipper could get herself kicked off a nudist beachSlightly related to the Skanky one. Kanye's bird has been flashing her bits in public and there's debate about whether she could be prosecuted. Same thing KP has done over the years and worse by sticking a Nokia up her crevice in public. Comments are not sympathetic, saying they should be on a register or she should be in a mental health ward!
View attachment 2785926
I've always fancied going to Boulder Canyon in the good old USA.The state of her boob
She will arrive in a fur coat and a rent rolls roBit busy, but here’s a quick recap of the last thread, it’s hotting up for Madam, and not in a good way
Basically, this happened. There were absolute scenes as videos, photos and comments from Skank and Chloe’s appearance at the Neath club night last Saturday were revealed.
View attachment 2785678View attachment 2785680
Mayhem at the club was exposed by secret undercover Tattle reporters @JaynieDay and @MrJayneDay as they filmed a few superb videos, showing Skank on stage singing atrociously (always a given) and trying to cajole the young crowd into pervy interactions including spitting in each other’s mouths. As it descended into a drunken confused chaos, Skank was ushered off the stage by bouncers. Chloe was nowhere to be seen, staying well out of the unfolding mess.
The Red Tops picked up on the story and really nailed her. The Scum taste blood now….
View attachment 2785686
While Skank made an absolute twat of herself, Chloe looked like she wanted to be anywhere but in Neath.
View attachment 2785687
Skank is still pulling the strings with regard to the fake relationship, the incredibly dim Lego-headed Kryten, giving her a helping hand by posting a cryptic load ofon IG.
Sweet lovin’ over cards in a pub on a Monday night, lover-boy Crawl now just a distant memory…
View attachment 2785691
Onward we go, a court case has appeared out of nowhere, happening tomorrow, the podcast is also due out on Thursday, where I’m sure all these exciting stories will be fully explained as Edna chuckles away, gonna be a good one @DC16and we await the OK magazine article where Skank tells us how she has found her “Prince Charming”….will he accompany her to court tomorrow
View attachment 2785701
I'm sorry but I'm getting C Jenner vibes hereView attachment 2786098
The bottom of Grant looks like the pastry lid on an uncooked apple pie.
Poor Jaynie - she was mistaken for a fan!Sorry if already posted, DM ran the story. Sorry still don't know how to upload properly
The toe-curling moment Katie Price quizzes fans on their 'sex lives' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowb...night-Wales.html?ito=native_share_article-top
They are so wonky lol totally diffrent sizes and full of scars id keep them well hidden lolView attachment 2786098
The bottom of Grant looks like the pastry lid on an uncooked apple pie.
Shes gross and repulsiveIf they took out her implants the skin would hang like two ancient scrotums after a total testectomy. Fancy that lads? Sexy enough for you?
They’re in totally different postcodesThey are so wonky lol totally diffrent sizes and full of scars id keep them well hidden lol
---
Shes gross and repulsive
What the hell is she wearing loo was it fancy dress nightThe Neath hotel posted this below, then had to limit comments and delete most of them as they were so badThey‘ve left a couple up from the #BeKind fans though.
When will people learn that any support for Skank, or using her as promotion will generate an immense amount of negativity. She is hated, and for good reasons, a drunk driver, a bankrupt not paying her debts, yet living a millionaire lifestyle, has stolen her two youngest children from their father and refused him access to them, her behaviour in public is abhorrent, a washed-up has-been, still trying to live off her celebrity status 20 years ago. A foul-mouthed drunk andaddled waste of space, more and more members of the public are seeing this, yet still we get this support of her, a support that will just bring you condemnation. Read the headlines people, you do not want to be associated with this woeful human, heavy criticism comes with her in abundance now, you gonna get badly burnt on SM
Gee, still these companies, organisations, clubs, hotels etc just don’t get it, and are surprised by the bad publicity she will bring them. I guess everyone is just a Troll though, not telling it as it is
View attachment 2785960
Diffrent bra sizes as well lolThey’re in totally different postcodes
This is fucking gold i love it Skanky manky cunt totally looking like a complete idiot and pissed as fuck hilarious she caused utter chaos lolThose Neath lads n lasses were slow to get up on stage, but faster getting off again. The lad with 'Colombia' on the back of his tee-shirt led the mass exodus with a nose-dive (ironically)
WTF state of that hair bald spots growing and extensions look crap as usual shes falling apartThe state of her hair (or lack of)! Plus, wasn’t she in the salon earlier in the day getting a blow dry? Why TF do they even bother
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?