She's gone 45 years without addressing that.She’s always plays the victim…I think she needs to start addressing that perhaps she is the problem and the one doing the bullying
She’s defo hating on the po po with that story, I think you’re spot on & Miss Marsh has had some kind of telling offHmmmm good thinking..or even a phonecall?
My thoughts exactly. It's a dig at the police.I feel that she’s posted that as a total deflection with everyone mentioning contacting the police for support with the doxxing etc to rally her supporters that the police are no good
Doesn't kiss Jodie's increasingly bigger ass = hate siteFacebook Jodie. It was Facebook.
She exaggerates everything - trying to give the impression that the woman is *gasp* here (the hate site according to her) with all the ‘VJBs who want to crawl inside her and wear her skin’.
NO Jodie! She was just on Facebook stating a fact and providing the receipts. As far as I’m aware Facebook isn’t a hate site
Was probably behind the wheel and had had enough after another ranty call message from Fritzel.My thoughts exactly. It's a dig at the police.
How would her really, really, really high up friend in the police feel about this?
She will be paranoid out of her mind about letting anyone near that hell hole in case she is exposed even more. The winner will either be someone she knows that hasn’t been seen before or it will be someone who doesn’t want to be publicly named or shown onlineShe'll probably hope that people forget about it or lie and say she put the draw in her stories and they must have missed it, like with the alleged genet update.
I don't really believe the above tbh. She'll probably announce a winner. There are families sat at home crossing everything that it'll be them and hoping to bring the kids along, but Jodie doesn't care about other people's hopes and feelings when she has digital axes to grind. That's where her energy is going. She doesn't give a shit about anyone else.
Everyone should change their Facebook profile photos to a photo of Jodie looking terrible or goose with its hand around it's throat and then Jodie will have to post those photosFacebook Jodie. It was Facebook.
She exaggerates everything - trying to give the impression that the woman is *gasp* here (the hate site according to her) with all the ‘VJBs who want to crawl inside her and wear her skin’.
NO Jodie! She was just on Facebook stating a fact and providing the receipts. As far as I’m aware Facebook isn’t a hate site
This is such a good idea.Everyone should change their Facebook profile photos to a photo of Jodie looking terrible or goose with its hand around it's throat and then Jodie will have to post those photos
Somethings rattled her. She’s nowhere near as clever as she likes to think but surely she must have some kind of loophole to allow her to get away with posting those photos & names?I take it back about the police visiting. Just looked at her stories and the doxxing stories are still up. She even added one more a few hours ago.
Don’t give her any ideasWhy doesn’t Jodie stand as the Police Commissioner for Essex and get them to bin off all their patrols and just have all officers surrounding the mud pit? With her contacts high up in the police and the fact everyone loves her and wants to be her this would be the ultimate litmus test. Go out to a vote and see how popular you are with real people (if they can spare the time between wanks).
I suppose her defence could be that these women (and one man) had posted under their real names with real photos of themselves so she wasn't exposing the identity of anonymous posters. She's also been very careful with the wording of the captions on each story. When she's saying "I think these people might be unwell, family please check on them" along with praying hands emojis it's obvious that she's being spiteful, sarcastic and facetious but the actual wording is professing to express concern for them and the police can only use her written words as evidence.Somethings rattled her. She’s nowhere near as clever as she likes to think but surely she must have some kind of loophole to allow her to get away with posting those photos & names?
Lorna always looks so well put together & her clothes are immaculate. Would love to hear what’s she’s saying to herself in her head whenever Jodie’s aboutI'm starting to think that Parge isn't a senior ranking Freemason after all. If she IS the daughter of a high level Mason and is carrying on like this it would be extremely embarrassing for Parge and his brother Masons would have suggested he tell his daughter to tone down her behaviour, particularly the open and public criticism of the police force (headed by Freemasons).
They probably would have quietly ensured she got her DWA licence, retrospective planning permission etc. if she had kept her head down and not made an absolute show of herself, harrassing neighbours, doxxing people etc. As it stands it's getting less and less plausible that Jodie is "a suitable person".
We all know Jodie doesn't listen to anyone's advice or instruction BUT the last person in the world she would risk upsetting is Parge, her human piggy bank. There's no way she'd risk losing her inheritance, she's even nice to Lorna (through gritted teeth) because she needs Parge onside and I bet she fucking DESPISES Lorna.
Good point, she’s not revealing anything more than they already have so technically not doxxing. I’ve had a quick search though & she could get herself in trouble for inciting hate/harrasment towards these people if any of her followers have contacted them as a result of her postsI suppose her defence could be that these women (and one man) had posted under their real names with real photos of themselves so she wasn't exposing the identity of anonymous posters. She's also been very careful with the wording of the captions on each story. When she's saying "I think these people might be unwell, family please check on them" along with praying hands emojis it's obvious that she's being spiteful, sarcastic and facetious but the actual wording is professing to express concern for them and the police can only use her written words as evidence.
That's the only possible defence I can imagine that she'd be able to use.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?