It’s the weird followers that are really, really hard to understand. Reading the comments that follow her tweets is like a ‘who can write the most gag-inducing shite’ competition. Someone commented on the height of her kid the other day, how fucking odd does someone have to be to concern themselves with someone else’s kid in this way? To say, are these simple-minded, overtly sycophant and easily-led sheep a fair representation of the british psyche? What a hopeless mess, if it is..I’ll never understand this level of self obsession. How the fucking fuck are FSM so triggering to her? Everything triggers her, but none of the overtly traumatic bullshit she spouts upsets anyone else, right? Jeez. My Nan had a bloody horrific childhood, which began just after WWI, and ended only at the start of WWII. She never went on about it, never moaned, never begged for sympathy. She just made sure to embrace her subsequent good fortune, worked extremely hard, and made damn sure everyone else enjoyed it too. This is why it’s so unbelievable that Jack was as poor as she makes out, because she says she find it triggering (see howling, clawing etc) and yet seems to want to go back to it. If it was that bad, and you had 3 therapists on speed dial, you’d be wanting to move forward. Not wallowing in misery as a ‘career’. I don’t know anyone who has had actual therapy that is this lacking in understanding. I don’t believe she has therapy, and I don’t believe she is in AA. I think she says therapy, because it fits in with how traumatised she is from her stint on benefits. I think if she went, same with AA, they would strongly encouraging her towards truth, responsibility, and curbing damaging behaviours on social media.
More waffle than a Birdseye factoryThe free school meals row should open up a debate about poverty itself | Jack Monroe
The public response is heartening. But why are so many falling into such desperate situations? Britain needs a plan of action, says campaigner and author Jack Monroewww.theguardian.com
That should sort her for another month rent
I don’t think anybody can answer questions about that recipe. Least of all whyThe 'Sickpea and Leech Curry' is a guest recipe on Nigella's page and this disclaimer has tickled me.
All I have in my head is the song, "There Are More Questions Than Answers.."
She is exhausting me and the guardian article has topped it off. There are so many excellent opeds out there this just makes meI have so much to read but I truly cba. She’s dangerous now. Devious.
So which is it? Either she decided with the child’s father to have the baby, or, he didn’t know she was pregnant?Found some vintage Jack when the Mums on Mumsnet accidentally summoned her up like a passive aggressive spirit.
She describes some pretty upsetting things but I personally no longer believe anything she says but for anyone who does or
might otherwise be distressed.
CW: Reference to suicide and loss of a child.
Why would she tweet this? I thought she was 'protecting people from being clobbered with yet another onslaught of 'LoOk HoW eAsY iT iS tO cOoK oN a BuDgEt'' At least, that's what she said less than 3 hours ago! How straaaaange....
It’s a sign of how much she is role-playing, her whole life is an act.View attachment 289352
‘Drat’ ‘Clobbered’. She speaks so strangely for someone so young.
And who has recently been posting egg pictures all over the web? I think that might be YOU MackieI am very behind but this was deffo written for us, right?
New guardian article making me want to boooak.
View attachment 289272
Eggs with anchoïade no less!And who has recently been posting egg pictures all over the web? I think that might be YOU Mackie
I know it’s already been said but MEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEME no shameI am very behind but this was deffo written for us, right?
New guardian article making me want to boooak.
View attachment 289272
There was a time when if you were a single mum you got benefits and housing for free. Could THAT have been her motivation?.
So why the need for a child, particularly when she seems to constantly ignore him now in favour of Twatter, feed him utter shite, and tear his favourite author to pieces?
Or she realised that she’s not really that important compared to the real issue, being starving kids.She deleted this within minutes
View attachment 289290
She just can't bring herself to be nice, can she?!
I can’t believe how riled up she makes meOr she realised that she’s not really that important compared to the real issue, being starving kids.
Printing stuff out and ‘filing’ it is an excellent way to fell like you’re doing ‘adulting’ well and being all organised. I suspect that JM has done a lot of that in the past and then pats herself in the back and says ‘I’m doing SOOOOO well’She prints everything out to stick in her lever arch files.
Thanks for the screenshot as I refuse to give them the views for this piece of shit article.I am very behind but this was deffo written for us, right?
New guardian article making me want to boooak.
View attachment 289272
Almost certainly not. The idea of young, single women having children in order to receive freebies they can live off forever more is a gross myth. Please, let's avoid perpetuating it and stick to all the thousands of real things we can complain about Jack for.There was a time when if you were a single mum you got benefits and housing for free. Could THAT have been her motivation?
Same as she never mentions UC - it's not in her frame of reference at all. Surprised (not really, sadly) no one has ever mentioned how out of date her so called knowledge about the benefits situation is, when they're using her as the 'expert' voice on everything pov.Isn’t it weird that she grew up so unimaginably poor (in her 5 bed house) yet doesn’t have any stories about FSM? She’s wailing and pawing at the floor over everything so surely her earliest dalliance with being skint would be up there on the guardian commissioned list?
I hear you. Does anyone else just long for the halcyon days of the comic protection filter?I have so much to read but I truly cba. She’s dangerous now. Devious.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?