True, for Jack to really pull the wool over our eyes, she needs to refer to a loved one as a āClass A twitāOh honestly, her laying into her husband is all you really need to know. That was the absolute BEST bit of the whole scandal
True, for Jack to really pull the wool over our eyes, she needs to refer to a loved one as a āClass A twitāOh honestly, her laying into her husband is all you really need to know. That was the absolute BEST bit of the whole scandal
Itās all for the drama in my opinionI'm still chuckling at jeopardising the case! which has been deleted, btw. of course you can't say much about a non-existent case!
Thing is, I live in the area so Iām really hoping I DONāT see herI think so as well. She is now worried she will be triangulated again.
Hopefully this isnāt the cabal. Iām aware there is still a small cluster of people on twitter who seem to have beef with her going back years.Imho, that isnāt funny. Whenever we get genuine reasons to feel like weāre in the right then this makes us look like twats. View attachment 248236
ETA - not judging. Just not my
Or when they read through the threads and see weāre constantly saying to her not to share pics with her internal door locks in them! There was that one of her on a stool looking like a pained artiste~ published in a national newspaper, what idiot signed that off?!I honestly don't understand why saying someone's lasagne looks like a horse has spunk all over it is a civil or criminal matter?
(In all seriousness, there is no laws against discussing information that someone has publically and willingly shared...?!?)
We know she reads here obsessively so sheās fully aware of the in jokes we have, easy to use the ruby rose and monrow thing and the doggos thing. Canāt say I think itās āsickā tbh lots of Celebs get cloned accounts it comes with the territory just report to twitter and theyāll pull it youāve got the blue tick ffsHas this other account that is allegedly bullying and harassing only just popped up then?
It's all just a little bit....I don't know, convenient? Coincidental?
If there was a case you most definitely wouldn't be mentioning it on Twitter.
Just imagining a scene in court where evidence is presented of a lasagne made with Jack's horse spunk sauce and a lasagne made with real horse spunk. Lasagnes are presented by both the defence and the prosecution. The prosecution say they have cooked their own lasagne but, it turns out it came from Waitrose. The judge is alerted to this by a regular Waitrose shopper in the jury. The prosecution have their evidence thrown out, as Jack screams 'frau! frau!' at the completely confused jury member.I honestly don't understand why saying someone's lasagne looks like a horse has spunk all over it is a civil or criminal matter?
Clemmie was jack levels of stupid, she insisted on carrying on posting even when lots of us knew it was her from the posting style alone.At least Clemmie had the decency to lay into her husband.
* I know nothing about MOD threads just heard about it 5th hand!
I agree. I have half a gcse in law and I am confident that there is no law against is saying that something resembles horse semen ephemera.I honestly don't understand why saying someone's lasagne looks like a horse has spunk all over it is a civil or criminal matter?
(In all seriousness, there is no laws against discussing information that someone has publically and willingly shared...?!?)
Looks like this one has been deleted. Come ahead Jack are we going to get to dress up after all? Bagsy the rinsed beans costume.Wondering now if there is something we donāt know about?
Also letās pretend for a minute minky wasnāt her - someone following her family and interacting with her ex, coupled with the ācurrent moodā photo on Facebook - well sheās got more things to worry about than this cabal of trolls.
But this is all diversionary tactics, I think.
she will showing her own empty kitchen cupboards soon as she is so poor.Sheās back to Asda. Obv there will be no hint of her (regular) Ocado delivery now sheās back on her primary twitter account.