Funded by the CIA?I hadn't realised the BBC don't make QT. Done by a 3rd party
Then the hellsite will be awash with ejacualte from her neckbeards because she was bullied by the MSM. Taking away from the fact that she will make a tit of herself and brings about as much to the debate on poverty as Harold Shipman would have to patient safetyCalm yourselves you ninnies, if there is anything QT does well it is attempting to undermine the token lefty on the panel, Jack is going to waffle a load of bollocks and Fiona Bruce is going to interrupt her and make her flustered.
Jack gets flustered just trying to cook something whilst recording herself in her own kitchen ffs.
DO YOU WANT MY LIVER TO STOP FUNCTIONING?I think sniffff should be a separate game. Like a drinking one. Take a sip of booze/bite of nightmeat every time!
But at least when you accidentally order 3 Cotswold sideboards it wasn't your fault......DO YOU WANT MY LIVER TO STOP FUNCTIONING?
I’m seeing the word IrregardlessTen points if she uses the word democide
Wonder which producer is mates with Old Riley/ Agent Adrian.I hadn't realised the BBC don't make QT. Done by a 3rd party
Mentorn Media do it so that's my guess too......someone will know someone or got a Lesbian AwardWonder which producer is mates with Old Riley/ Agent Adrian.
That was a well spent 5 minutes checking out all the production team profiles at MentornMentorn Media do it so that's my guess too......someone will know someone or got a Lesbian Award
I'm with this. Best thing you can do with shitty people is platform them and expose their views to sunlight. I remember reading that the BNP's (admittedly always tiny) support base really cratered after Adolf Griffin was on QT. Because his views were exposed as being based on literally nothing but blind hate, but also because he came across as a useless, embarrassing moron.I agree. The more exposure she gets the more people wake up. She's got away with it because she slips under the radar. Most people have little idea of her, if they've even heard of her at all. Because of the way she controls the narrative with the poverty tweets and dirty deletes she can get away with it.
We only know the story because we are a hive mind. All of us have brought a tiny bit to the table and made the big picture. Someone on their own reading one tweet about £20 budget with no context about the rest of her life would never realise.
That's why DKL was so brilliant (or terrible). She was on telly every single day being nasty, snarky and just shit at cooking. She was on primetime TV when the entire country was at home watching her. She couldn't control her image and pissing off Matt Tebbut was just icing on the cake.
I want her to be on live telly. I don't watch reality shows but I'd take annual leave to sit and watch her all day on celebrity BB.
I was trying to think of examples but the only one Ican recall was the crap free school meals lunches “poverty picnic”Can I add 'says something edgy but ultimately it's a meaningless soundbite' to the QT bingo?
See I reckon he popped that adjective in to slyly say she can afford to dress well despite not being able to afford shower gel.On that note - I re-read the Simon Hattenstone Guardian piece the other day and noticed he described her as “stylish” so clearly his eyes failed to do due diligence. She dresses like my best friends 70 year old, middle class, woman’s institute attending, coast walking, slightly racist mum.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?