Yes I think it could be, I’m not sure they know exactly which gene/s causes it yet though!
Yes I think it could be, I’m not sure they know exactly which gene/s causes it yet though!Ooh, is this why redheads sometimes need more anaesthesia?? Fascinating!
Let’s face it guys, Jack never took that many or drank that much. She is a revolting person for lying about it.
Some squigs are conflating it by saying it was a refund actioned through Patreon, but this refund was by requesting one from Jack’s PayPal account which she approved straight away - I suspect as instructed by JM. Funny how she hasn’t lost the keys to that account eh.le sigh. hopefully though if she can refund one squig, she can refund them all
As do NSAIDs like Naproxen. Suddenly the slop makes sense 🫣Tramadol , in fact all opiates give you chronic constipation
She is literally full of shit.
Isn't there a time limit for refunds from PayPal?Some squigs are conflating it by saying it was a refund actioned through Patreon, but this refund was by requesting one from Jack’s PayPal account which she approved straight away - I suspect as instructed by JM. Funny how she hasn’t lost the keys to that account eh.
As do NSAIDs like Naproxen. Suddenly the slop makes sense 🫣
I don't know. She has her "forever home" so maybe this book was nothing more than a contractual obligation. I don't think she gives a shit, she's got what she wanted. However, the ridicule *must* be hurting and embarrassing her. Good.She won't be able to stand her book bombing when others in the same genre are flying. It will cause her deep narcissistic injury. This is why she isn't promoting it, seeing it flop is pain enough for her. The ridicule surrounding the "tips" will amplify the injury tenfold. This is also why she's returning to type, snark, aggression, threats, pretend ailments. Anything to change the narrative and ease the pain
She has ignored others yesAm I right in thinking Jack has ignored others who asked; but this squig mentioned it on a blue tick comment to Jack and then she was all over it?
I hope the red haired refund seeker persists and takes it to smol claims and that one by one, others follow suit.
Especially as some of the people outstripping her by miles are novices, with just a ton of effort, genuine pride in their work and some good recipes. She can't blame it on the cooking elite closing ranks against the smol brave pixie.However, the ridicule *must* be hurting and embarrassing her. Good.
She split up with Louisa about a year previous to her going into rehab - though this being Jack, it may have taken a year to sink inAlso interesting to me that she split up with Louisa right after. Aren't couples with addiction issues advised to split after rehab for better prospects of recovery? Just speculation of course...
I think that's what we can hope for in the Great Cancellation, that people better than her comes forward and over take her. Her book is atrocious. I think there are quite a few that have had their eyes opened to her grift now due to that and the terrible Guardian article debacle. To be honest, she kind of left the door open for them due to her not doing any campaigning for ages. Now that refunds can actually happen, let's hope more and more people come forward requesting and citing smol claims court if it doesn't happenEspecially as some of the people outstripping her by miles are novices, with just a ton of effort, genuine pride in their work and some good recipes. She can't blame it on the cooking elite closing ranks against the smol brave pixie.
She was lazy, complacent and slapdash. Her book is unaspirational and unappealing. She seriously thought she could foist any old rubbish on the public again and they would buy it. Literally.
Invisible hats - yes!We should get special VBI hats for the anniversary. And if we don't we can still celebrate that our hats are nowhere to be seen and possibly non-existent. Like the actual VBI.
That makes it even funnier.She made that up after people starting laughing at her rinsed hoops.
If it was wedding savings, she must have had a fair chunk put away. This is the fee for her dayhab, for 6 weeks. Was it 12 weeks she did in the end? I can't remember.She split up with Louisa about a year previous to her going into rehab - though this being Jack, it may have taken a year to sink in. And I don't believe she spent her 'wedding savings' on the rehab. I think Louisa may have paid for it. If you were to believe Jack, during the ongoing poverty / trammies and whiskey / sideboards paid with Patreon money/ etc, she's still saying she had savings with Louisa? Nah. She got Louisa to dip into her savings for the weeks at an aparthotel in central London plus dayhab fees. Though Louisa was probably just happy Jack wasn't staying at hers, and might have thought it worth it to cover her bills for this reason alone.
Yeah and dayhab's meant to be the cheaper option, because it allows people to attend from their own home rather than paying for a residential program. Jack of course probably paid more in the end because for some reason she felt she had to go to one in London and stay in the aparthotel for the duration.If it was wedding savings, she must have had a fair chunk put away. This is the fee for her dayhab, for 6 weeks. Was it 12 weeks she did in the end? I can't remember.Then there was the fees for her aparthotel for all that time on top. This would have been within the 2 year period that she didn't buy shampoo as well .
Still a few pages behind but honestly Jack is the only “celebrity” I know of who does a press interview and then spends the next ten days furiously clarifying, obfuscating and defending her own words in itI did ask them not to be specific. Sure, Jan. Don't do drugs, kids. View attachment 1888319
I'm sure in the Diva.pdf she said she was browsing rehab options and they were too costly for her, then she spotted this dayhab service which was much more affordable. And then she goes and books up an aparthotel for 3 months or whatever, spending £££Yeah and dayhab's meant to be the cheaper option, because it allows people to attend from their own home rather than paying for a residential program. Jack of course probably paid more in the end because for some reason she felt she had to go to one in London and stay in the aparthotel for the duration.
It was a morning when she had several interviews that day. She sounded terrible in all of them. A lack of due diligence to interview her when she said she had just had convulsions. Perhaps they didn't believe her
Ah ok. Deleted my post anyway, thought it might not be right to speculateShe split up with Louisa about a year previous to her going into rehab - though this being Jack, it may have taken a year to sink in. And I don't believe she spent her 'wedding savings' on the rehab. I think Louisa may have paid for it. If you were to believe Jack, during the ongoing poverty / trammies and whiskey / sideboards paid with Patreon money/ etc, she's still saying she had savings with Louisa? Nah. She got Louisa to dip into her savings for the weeks at an aparthotel in central London plus dayhab fees. Though Louisa was probably just happy Jack wasn't staying at hers, and might have thought it worth it to cover her bills for this reason alone.
My theory on the LJC split timeline is that she LEFT May 2020 but Jack blatantly s***** baited her back with all her dramatic antics in the second half of 2020 (sorry for lack of spoiler but my tool bar is completely greyed out for some reason?).She split up with Louisa about a year previous to her going into rehab - though this being Jack, it may have taken a year to sink in. And I don't believe she spent her 'wedding savings' on the rehab. I think Louisa may have paid for it. If you were to believe Jack, during the ongoing poverty / trammies and whiskey / sideboards paid with Patreon money/ etc, she's still saying she had savings with Louisa? Nah. She got Louisa to dip into her savings for the weeks at an aparthotel in central London plus dayhab fees. Though Louisa was probably just happy Jack wasn't staying at hers, and might have thought it worth it to cover her bills for this reason alone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?