Donating only £1 to the honesty box for something she knew to be valuable isn't.... very honest.
Especially since OH was from a wealthy family, and Jack was taking up to £350,000 from Patreon at the time.
Donating only £1 to the honesty box for something she knew to be valuable isn't.... very honest.Those cordon bleu cookery books go for a good price on eBay and ABE (other websites are available). The likelihood of finding a full set for £1 each must be very low.
It is weird. It is almost as if they want it to be shit.Don't worry, she hasn't been paid for that. She/her PR has paid for it to be included, hence why it still has major errors in it. You think with all the money they're spaffing on these things they'd pay for a proofreader.
Reminds me of when I saw a Le Creuset fondue set for £25 at a second hand book shop near me. I dithered for thirty minutes but the thought of dipping my crudités into a dead person’s cheese pot gave me too much of an ick to put my hand in my pocket.Those cordon bleu cookery books go for a good price on eBay and ABE (other websites are available). The likelihood of finding a full set for £1 each must be very low.
And don t forget your shit hot solicitor.
Too short.
Get your free hour on Jack.
Ha, and they drop her in the poo poo when they doIs it not very unusual that out of half a million followers none of them are irl friends that ever pop up to corroborate a tall tale?
Wait. You mean we're not beingPlease - my aneurism - getting a cease and desist letter isn’t the same as getting served
This is a simple example of how it works in the wild
imagine me now - you lot of ninnies better cease and desist calling cease and desist letter being served or I’m WARNINGyou I’m gonna start legal proceedings
imagine you don’t desist - I send you a letter before action. Listen ninnines I’ve WARNED you about this and if you don’t stop mithering in the next 14 days and remove all your posts about people being served then I’ll be applying to the court to stop ya fkrs!
you don’t respond you don’t stop, so then I have to fill out a nice little form on the government website, attached all my screenshots of your bad behaviour, pay my fee. Then the nice court people take a look and put a pretty stamp on them and THEN papers are severed to the defendant (you lot) - obvs there’s a few bits you’ll need like a bastard “acknowledgment of service form” - just so you know you’ve been served
Any more people saying has she been severed and I’m serving…and it won’t be one of Jacks thrifty meals! WARNED!
Being served is court papers. I cannot believe that Jack has jumped through any of the requisite hoops to bring a case to court against Molly. She has form for sending C&D it’s a nice cheap easy scare tactic. Judges have no time for litigation where no don’t want people
Also, painting your ceiling (5th wall wankery) is instahun2020 - stop it Jack
Also, I think she’s already in her forever shitty flat
I mean, Spanny Friend confirmed she's buying. So this is strange ....Is it not very unusual that out of half a million followers none of them are irl friends that ever pop up to corroborate a tall tale?
I’m slightly hesitant to take spaniel friend saying she’s buying as 100% confirmation mostly because there’s no guarantee Jack isn’t lying to spaniel friend, even though she knows her in real life.
It's OK, it wasn't Jack, it was a partners dads brothers uncle or somethingDonating only £1 to the honesty box for something she knew to be valuable isn't.... very honest.
Especially since OH was from a wealthy family, and Jack was taking up to £350,000 from Patreon at the time.
What does the cost of F&B matter when she's planning on getting it for free?View attachment 1885003
...and she was only accused of buying paint, not the house!
(So is she saying that she's planning to find the paint in a puddle?)
Savile was into that apparently.dipping my crudités into a dead person’s cheese pot
Interesting. It's a harassment technique called 'swatting' when a malicious report is made to authorities supposedly for someone's welfare. Was there ever any hints as to who it was? In reality usually a neighbour sick of hearing shit at all hours.The possible theory was based on a combo of:
1-Jack seemed irrationally angry about the visit
2- Fraus were a little bemused as to why Essex bizzies would spend their time on it
3- I was remembering the"On a scale of "1" to "even your imaginary partner LEFT" how toxic are you in relationships?" post of a while back and my mind replaced LEFT with "restraining order"
4-It was suggested by fraus-in-the-know that OH had been deluged by messages
=So the "welfare" check might actually have been on behalf of OH, in the form of a popo visit warning Jack to desist.
But that only works in the other timeline where visit happened after.
She is honestly the luckiest person ever, she never seems to have to pay for anything, it's all found or gifted (sorry, grifted)Puddles, ex-partners dads at train stations with borrowed bags for life, charity shops who don't understand designer labels...
I think I like puddles best.
I'd have thought it was a pretty stupid move to attempt to make people think she's buying but this is Jack we're talking about so ....I’m slightly hesitant to take spaniel friend saying she’s buying as 100% confirmation mostly because there’s no guarantee Jack isn’t lying to spaniel friend, even though she knows her in real life.
That and the possibility Jack is deliberately asking people to muddy the waters… that buying post stayed up for a long time, longer than I’d think it would have for someone innocently landing her in it.
Some people sniff to be interesting, some people sniff to be interested. She is neither.She's so fucking boring..even sniffing.
How is that even possible
For anyone who missed it...Do you remember when it was Jacks birthday and she was pretending she had friends and they were all together having jolly japes in a wonderful cottage and she was cooking. Then they all carried her cheap books back. Harold’s dad did it
View attachment 1884942
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?