I suppose it’s just about possible that someone had their lawyer write a threatening letter along the lines of, update my client or we’ll commence action. But tbh I doubt it. From what I can tell from what’s been posted on here, Patreon’s very much set up on a caveat emptor basis and it doesn’t have the sort of consumer protections that exist in real life from obudsman, regulators and ultimately the law. The internets not bound by national laws and protections which is precisely why it enables grifters. You pays your money, you takes your risk.I wonder if the terrible 24 hours that followed the amazing 24 hours involved some kind of legal situation which has led to JM being forced to make some sort of amends to avoid making things much much worse.
I think the more likely chain of events is that the angry clamour from squigs just got too strong. Jack blames Tattle for exposing her grift (rather than herself, natch) so thought she could change the narrative by coming on here posing as Caroline. But we rumbled her so that didn’t work. She tried Vienetta deflection, didn’t work. So she’s had no choice but to post an apparent mea culpa, which as @NellieBoo pointed out, isn’t a mea culpa at all because she’s been claiming she’s sorting out the Patreon mess for at least the past two months.