$559 to make your rear view look like that!
$559 to make your rear view look like that!View attachment 1646764 Plus at least one Viv ruffled shirt.
Can any textile or fashion fraus add any more details re cost and styles?
PS That Viv thrift store must be MASSIVE
[/SPOILER]
She hasn't even put her boobs in the cups in the photoNo idea what was going on there, surely she must have had something decent she could have posed in? What made her think that a sagging grey sports bra and control pants would be alluring? Maybe LJC has unusual tastes idk. The whole photo session definitely suggested a cold and blizzardy night, when you look back now.
The open letter to SB’s dad in the Guardian was the seed of doubt for me.Hello! What's this about a dildo? I'm not googling it.
When did everyone else realise she's completely deranged? It was the practice run for moving to a one bed for me.
Eta: Looking back, there were a number of signs.
I expect their prices may have been increased since the last lot of forensic work was done on the JM inventory of spenny things, but the filler she most likely has is £330 per ml. So the average cost per year (based on the amounts I guessed she’d have in a 3 year period) is £990.As far as we know she goes too or certainly has been to Vie Aesthetics for her treatments https://www.vie-aesthetics.com/
Is this too long for thread title? It's a banger!
Starting from a baseline of lip poverty is the funniest thing I have ever read!Regarding the filler, as a filler Frau myselfhere are my thoughts regarding the total number of mls.
She would certainly have had 1ml in her lips, this is a fairly standard amount for lips that look ‘natural’. I know she was starting from a baseline of lip poverty, but even still I don’t think she has more than 1ml at a time. I agree that it would last around a year, 6 months if you do things like chew your lip, don’t keep your lips hyrdrated or anything else that will make it disperse it quicker, so it’s possible she’s keeping them topped up more regularly.
Re the face, I’d say the changes are pretty noticeable, therefore my guess is she’s having 3-4ml at a time. You can get 2 year products which tend to be more expensive. I pay £270 per ml for a 2 year product but I do go to a clinic that is at the pricey end of the scale because if you feel you must fuck around with your face, you want to be in well-trained hands IMO. As Jack doesn’t believe in scrimping at any time other than when she’s doing performative £20 Asda shops, she likely shares this philosophy. Plus, she may have different areas of her face filled at different times, so it’s not necessarily the case that she’s having the same areas treated each time.
If I was being conservative, I’d say 1ml per year for lips, plus an average of 3ml per 18 months for her face. Happy to be challenged on this. This is not including Botox obv, which she quite clearly has too. At the risk of doubly triangulating myself, I am rubbish at maths so this may not affect the overall total already estimated.
Great quote...but to veer off-topic, if anyone wants another crazy rabbithole to go down while Jack is quiet, look up the nowhitesaviors account. It's a wild ride!
This is superb.You couldn't make it up.
I want to comment on the length of these trousers! Unless she’s had them shortened… being 5.1 or whatever, they would be too long on her (especially if you look at the pic of the model a few posts back). But here, they look the same length as the models… who would definitely not be 5.1, so unless she’s had them shortened she must be tallerFrom earlier this year. They’re so bloody warm. Shame she didn’t have them during the poverty when she was freezing cold for TWO YEARS.
Also, why does she appear to have an ankle monitor around her ankle? Is it something to do with hate crimes against food?
View attachment 1646702
Yep, she had/has more than one. Her and LJC had matching wool ones and she also had that lighter weight one.
It’s the laces for me. Every single time. Why not just buy shorter laces rather than turn Converse into clown shoes?I want to comment on the length of these trousers! Unless she’s had them shortened… being 5.1 or whatever, they would be too long on her (especially if you look at the pic of the model a few posts back). But here, they look the same length as the models… who would definitely not be 5.1, so unless she’s had them shortened she must be taller
She spent £40 for a roll of wallpaper to create that! Has it been used again? Has it even seen the light of day? Has it bobbinsThe wallpaper to do list is such a perfect illustration of one of Jack's most basic problems: it's just one big performance. The noted on it are meant to be read by other people, not reminders for herself - look at the way she puts "BBC show" and "client D". No need to be vague if you're writing for yourself. See also the infamous covid household notes.
Plus, how fucking time-consuming would that shit be? Imagine the dino nap she must have felt entitled to afterwards...
I really like those viv red checked trousers, they really suit her. But my god why did she think copying Leggy’s Fat Controller waistcoat obsession would be a good idea. They really don’t look good on either of themFrom earlier this year. They’re so bloody warm. Shame she didn’t have them during the poverty when she was freezing cold for TWO YEARS.
Also, why does she appear to have an ankle monitor around her ankle? Is it something to do with hate crimes against food?
View attachment 1646702
Yep, she had/has more than one. Her and LJC had matching wool ones and she also had that lighter weight one.
Quoting myself again like the absolute maverick I am; but this is my whole aneurysm with her. She’s 5.1 allegedly, so therefore she should really only fit into petite clothing (petite ninny here, the battle is real) all these designer clothes, none have petite options, I know this as I have repeatedly looked and tried to buy said items, and the like, and they never fit; arms too long, trousers too long, hips in wrong place, shoulder straps too long and don’t fit. There is no way she is as short as she states or we would most definitely be hearing about all the trials and tribulations of buying clothes that fit. Not just the odd post about wearing a 8 year old boys top! And she would need everything adjusted.. can’t see her getting that leather jacket adjusted…. We would definitely be hearing about it if she had- we know she loves to push the agenda that’s she’s a cutie smol fragile pixie.I want to comment on the length of these trousers! Unless she’s had them shortened… being 5.1 or whatever, they would be too long on her (especially if you look at the pic of the model a few posts back). But here, they look the same length as the models… who would definitely not be 5.1, so unless she’s had them shortened she must be taller
I don't believe a lot about what Jackie says or does but know a bloke who helped her move house years ago and said she is very very short.Apparently Claudia Winkleman is 5'4". (But who knows. Telly people seem small, I guess it's to fit on the screen).
And guess it depends on the shoes.
View attachment 1646974
Apparently behind the scenes
View attachment 1646983
It’s just like the Apple store they have portable PoS terminals. The whole experience is basically the same as the Apple store just less enthusiastic lol. Her experience of the nasty SA is also…. atypical but I imagine some must mirror the treatment they receiveSitting here like a pov trying to figure out how this workssend knowledgeos
Edit: ok I have Googled "inside Burberry store" and I'm feeling a bit imposter syndrome just imagining walking into one of these places.
No offence intended to any Burberry fans - the stuff looks gorgeous. Just that I'd have a panic attack in the shop.
She’s still a twat!I don't believe a lot about what Jackie says or does but know a bloke who helped her move house years ago and said she is very very short.
He also said she's a bit of a drama queen. I'd question the 'bit' part!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?