overdueanadventure
Chatty Member
The nursery staff called me their ‘star parent’ today for paying Small Boys nursery fees.
Wtf?
Wtf?
These deep dives into her blog are quite enlightening. The same shopping list keeps her and SB well fed and even slightly "pudgy" round the edges but also leaves them hungry and in abject poverty. Schrodinger's shopping list?If you look back at her old blogs thoroughly, it's pretty clear that her initial ambition was to get into local politics. There are countless incredibly dull entries covering minor disputes at Southend council meetings. Almost all the posts in the first year are about local Southend dramas (and apologies to Southend Frauen, but fuck me, that is some boring shit). Even the original name of the blog was Our Southend.
I suspect that Bread & Jam, just like her volunteering and her posting Southend volunteering vacancies throughout summer 2012 and her other charitable endeavours, was an attempt to show her community spirit. The early blogs suggest that she really wanted to be a pillar of the community - she won an award in autumn 2012 for volunteering or giving back or some shit.
Then when the Sunday People feature happened, she realised that Sad Single Mum Can't Afford Xmas was a better story than Plucky Single Mum Saves Southend From The Tories.
You can see the whiplash in December 2012:
11/12: Jack's circumstances have improved but she continues to spend 10£ a week on food because she's used to it and doesn't need to spend more: https://web.archive.org/web/2013021...2/12/11/10-a-week-food-shop-shopping-list-etc
23/12: Sunday People starring Sad Jackie Munroe: https://web.archive.org/web/2013013...oung-mum-turns-off-heating-so-she-can-1502710
29/12: Jack has 2p in the bank: https://web.archive.org/web/2013011...k.com/2012/12/29/2012-tears-fears-and-cheers/
I think I differ from a lot of you in that I don't believe she set out to be a grifter (I think most of her shitty money stuff is due to just due to her being incredibly lazy and also quite thick). Instead, she was motivated by fame and recognition. That started out as being locally known within Southend politics, then pivoted post-Sunday People to a bigger stage. You can see her monstrous ego at play as far back as May '12, when she clearly already saw herself as locally famous:
View attachment 1639872
Well as a charity shop aficionado I am utterly in disbelief. I can imagine a sweater passing the Beady Eye of the Sorting Person but a coat? No chance. Pre-eBay volunteers could miss Farhi or DKNY, Karen Millan etc because they just didn’t know the brand. You can however, feel a quality garment and coats are never 50p. I paid £30 for an M&S wool coat a few years ago-it’s almost as if everything she says is a fabrication. There’s also a question of ethics here. It could be argued the shop had their chance when the item passed through their hands and you bought it fair and square. Therefore any profit you make is yours with no moral obligation to the charity. However-if you bought the item knowing how valuable it was and bought it purely to sell it on with no intention of fairly splitting with the charity then I have a bit of a problem with that. If you bought it to own it and love it and you know the true value then you should just tell the charity shop person and make a more generous payment. It’s still a charity shop after all and it was your lucky find. I’m so glad it’s all a lie and it’s either new as she stated from book money (although that too is a scam) or she bought it off eBay or similar.
I don’t disagree with you about Big Dave and ego, but I tend to cut her parents some slack for two simple reasons:I’m increasingly of the opinion that her parents enable her, I also get the impression big Dave will have a Billy Big Balls ego and this has been passed down to his daughter. She will also convince family that articles etc… are wrong/ manipulated ( like she did over the Jeremy Kyle working class stereotype) and they will believe her.
Most parents believe the very best of their children, I know my Dad thinks I need a shaded monocle for parts of my anatomy such is the sunshine that emanates from that areaand his ability to bore the bollocks off anyone stupid enough to ask how I am is utterly cringe inducing same for Jack. What with Jack’s show pony charity work I bet they feel pride, enable her and gladly accept the trolling narrative ( probably all except for her brother). I would also wonder if she has guilt tripped them ( the birthmark comments from her Mum made me wonder) about her upbringing particularly her obvious resentment of the foster children.
I would say the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, the family are complicit, Big Dave is very probably an irritating egoist and Jack has emulated for his attention found she loves the money/ minor celeb lifestyle and ten years later …. Plus she cannot stop lying….
Yeah that’s right. He had to sell off his Wedgewood and Omega Seamaster watch too. Really tragic storytelling by Ken Loach there.I’ve not seen Daniel Blake. But did his well off parents live around the corner and he just refused to ask them for help?
I agree with you I think everything might be a lot bigger than we think.Based on everything I've read that has been posted here, there's no waaaaay this grift/scheme isn't bigger than we think.
If the lying is smoke, there's one hell of a fire somewhere.
She had some of them pre-Poverty:Oh god, yeah- doesn't she claim to have got her tats when still working in her well-paid fire service job?
See, if you keep a big secret from your parents it’s because it’s something you’re ashamed of or you think they’d be ashamed of. Poverty isn’t something to be ashamed of and if you and your son were starving then that immediate need would trump any shame you might feel.
“wee” and “ta” in one tweet …she’s gearing up for a chaos
If that is correct, then even by Jack’s standards, my mind is (not)LITERALLY BLOWN that in 2022 she is still grifting cash for a charity that ceased operating in 2016.Holy crap. Does the charity know about this? I've just googled them and they seem legit. How many slop manuals could they conceivably need? I mean there must be a limit, right?!? Would they not rather have the £10.99?
This is outrageous.
ETA: states that 25% of profits on the rainbow print will go to Broken Rainbow. Which ceased operations in 2016.