KweanOfMean
Member
She's not keeping her powder dry though....go on Jack, do it....nowt so cleansing as sunlight ;-)
She's not keeping her powder dry though....go on Jack, do it....nowt so cleansing as sunlight ;-)
My theory:
You really got the better deal. Imagine paying an extra £60 for a near identical toaster only to have it patronise you and explain it's a toaster at you.The Emma Bridgewater toaster? £80 toaster for the poverty times. Mine is an identical midl isle at Aldi special-it’s just lacking it’s handy gadget label telling me what it does but that knocked £60 off it’s price so happy days.
for a), the actual quote is from Martin Daubney, who said she "no doubt probably earns more than the Prime Minister". Jack sneakily leaves the first three words off whenever she quotes him (which, again, is likely to play badly in court).I lost the gist a bit but was her case against Lee Anderson (who always reminds me so much of Nick Hancock) two fold - a) he said she had more money/'earned' more money than the PM, and b) that she made money off those poorer than herself.
Isn't she crazy to pursue b? It is easily provable she has? Even one tweet from someone saying 'I'm on benefits but I've sent you £10' shows he is right and there are many examples of it. And surely the PM claim is just silly to pursue?
Whoever said she is trying to create her Katie Hopkins glory days is right. Bit sad she has progressed so little that she has to reach back in time to use what worked before.
Nick Hancock - he is LA's double.
View attachment 1640244
Not sure why in May 2012 she needed to sign up to get a degree (or two) when as we all know, in March 2012 she already had one. This one in March must have been in something other than “Social Policy and Criminology alongside a BA(Hons) in PPE”, I suppose.
Oh, and to follow on a bit more from @HotesTilaire’s posts, the self employed craft venture she set up and quit her job to become self employed for? All profits going not to her, but to local community organizations.If she got £250 per month income from bread and jam, she would be eligible for top up working tax credits at that time IIRC. She could also have claimed Jobseekers/Income support and declared the Bread and Jam earnings, and given some up to keep her benefits.
The system has changed a lot since then so I might be a bit wrong, but broadly- she wasn’t claiming everything she would have been entitled to.
That element (JSA, WTC, Income Support) is what I think of as benefits. Housing and child is just kind of straightforward, lots of people claim, there’s never really been “shame” attached to them in the same way as “unemployment” benefit. IYSWIM.
In any case the Bread and Jam foundation becoming a community non-profit pseudo charity/good cause piqued my interest. Such a good person helping others!
Also- the fire service job being 1hr drive away, I forget the name of the Centre/location but it’s been mithered over before. A local frau May recall it. This was also why she was apparently learning to drive in that car she used to own.
So hang on, she’s implying she’s taking legal action against Martin Daubney, Lee A etc but as MD said there’s been no action, they don’t realize that she is doing so?
Guys, this is interesting - according to Slack Monroe, SB put paid to her emulating her brother’s (distinguished) career in the RAF. So SB is the one reason she isn’t on the same level as her (presumably very hard-working) bro.Oh, PS she quit an actual job to do that stuff too, despite lots of people expressing reservations about this being a wise course of action.
Yeah, yet again she sounds like she’s in the direst of circumstances and abject poverty here, right?![]()
Self Employed Single Mummy: Week Three
So, I’m officially in Week Three of self-employed single mummy status. Week three? Where has that time gone? Well so far it’s gone on two exhausting but successful preview days at the Work Of Art G...web.archive.org
Oh and this is nothing to do with her crafting, but is yet another very interesting post- for many reasons…
ETA yet more evidence she’s always been a shameless self publicist. This is her highlighting a letter ‘someone’ wrote that was published in the newspaper she worked at. An early![]()
Poppyright.
One thing I've noticed this year, is a distinct lack of red paper poppies pinned to the lapels of the general public. I'm sitting in a coffee shop at the moment, with a quick head count of 27 other...web.archive.org
![]()
View attachment 1638269
To be honest the ungrateful fuckers have never so much as even thanked me for it. They act as though paying your bills for a service you have received is *normal*. The cheek of it.I hope they take you to one side and murmur in your ear how much they appreciate everything you do.
(I don’t. That would be so horrible)
I have to know who keyed Jack's car and what the insult was.I’m aware that this piece is absolutely awash with bollocks. Something caught my eye…
In all my years of driving, knowing literally hundreds of other drivers, having accidents, experiencing a hit & run and vandalism etc etc etc I have NEVER known of ‘the shame of driving around in a car that someone has keyed an insult on’. WHAT? Who is doing that? I might have seen it on TV years ago but a spray can is much quicker and easier. Weird. Does it happen in Elevenerife?
I would actually love to see an investigation taking in both right and left to expose all this paid content. I think it plays a big part in online politics feeling like cheese dream in a way it didn't before.Here it is:
Ironically Hopkins is likely the same but still, horrendous interview for Femi there. I defimitely think people on both sides of the political spectrum including Jack are open to being actual rentagobs.
Yeah she would have to prove that what he said is defamatory. In a libel case the onus is on the plaintiff to prove harm has been caused whether financially emotionally or whatever by the alleged libel. So Anderson could properly seek disclosure of Jacks financial affairs to show that she does profit by her grift and therefore that what he said was either true or a reasonably held opinion, not libel.Ok I'm not a legal frau but I've watched enough episodes of Suits to think that if you take someone to court don't you open yourself up for discovery? So you can be looked into i.e. your bank records, tax affairs etc etc? Isn't this just going to be a disaster for her?
I don't particularly care for Daubney or Anderson but I at least respect them for seeing issues they want to fix and doing the work to become an MP or whatnot. This is the whole point in a democracy even if you strongly disagree with what they say, I respect them for standing up and trying to put their point across and putting themselves in the firing lijne. Why haven't you done this Jack and followed through on it? I bet they get horrific abuse but are still out there doing their bit.
She's even elevenarifed studying for the OU: clever bit of wording to make it sound like she will be doing 2 degree courses, when any fule nos you do individual courses with different credit amounts on a pathway to gain credits for a degree. *insert rolling eye emoji*