Can’t remember who our comment database source is but was this the glossy mag seeking comment or is there another article out please? Wasn’t something happening today or did Sunday woman land a day early?WHY IS IT CALLED SUNDAY WOMAN THOUGH?????
Can’t remember who our comment database source is but was this the glossy mag seeking comment or is there another article out please? Wasn’t something happening today or did Sunday woman land a day early?WHY IS IT CALLED SUNDAY WOMAN THOUGH?????
Linky to media:Being a ninny this morning - can a fellow frau take pity on me and advise where the media section is? I looked at the wiki & couldn't see it?
I'm going to catch up on the radio Scotland & the podcast this morning.
Apparently I'm a gluten for punishment!
Con artist
I don't know, but also I don't know why they were looking for comment from other journalists rather than, say, The Trussell Trust or whatever.Can’t remember who our comment database source is but was this the glossy mag seeking comment or is there another article out please? Wasn’t something happening today or did Sunday woman land a day early?
I don’t think that’s Jack. There’s loads of channels like that. Sometimes there’s a robot sounding voice which reads newspaper articles. Probably clickbait.13 short videos were uploaded to YouTube in the end yesterday. There's also a load of variants on Bootstrapcook accounts being made on twitter. What is she up to?
View attachment 1615226
Perhaps they're getting a feel for current media opinion on Jack and the critical voices speaking up?I don't know, but also I don't know why they were looking for comment from other journalists rather than, say, The Trussell Trust or whatever.
Lol I can't wait for this squig to tell people what recipes she's tried
View attachment 1615454
Ask Jack for inspo - shame to waste ready-boiled piss!Lol I can't wait for this squig to tell people what recipes she's tried
View attachment 1615454
No. It’s not a glossy mag. It just seems to be a random blog started by the writer of the Jack piece. Lots of the articles are written by her and it’s very rarely updated. A lot of writers/journos have blogs like this to use as a kind of portfolio to show their writing skills.Can’t remember who our comment database source is but was this the glossy mag seeking comment or is there another article out please? Wasn’t something happening today or did Sunday woman land a day early?
or lack thereofNo. It’s not a glossy mag. It just seems to be a random blog started by the writer of the Jack piece. Lots of the articles are written by her and it’s very rarely updated. A lot of writers/journos have blogs like this to use as a kind of portfolio to show their writing skills.
I wonder how much of that £226.84 went to the woman in those videos?So she's likely paid for this sort of thing?
It's not going to work, Jack.![]()
too many are hostages to Jack's fortunesI wonder how much of that £226.84 went to the woman in those videos?
The way she was rocking back and forth, mumbling through her script at maximum speed, with her face covered to protect her identity - I've seen less distressing hostage videos.
Maybe she does actually consume boiled piss, in which case Jack’s recipes may seem passable to her?Lol I can't wait for this squig to tell people what recipes she's tried
View attachment 1615454
I was coming on to say that. Definitely not a Jack stan. It’s a good thing that others apart from Tattle are calling her out.Guys, the "cool girl hypocrites" tweet wasn't written by a Jack stan - it's one of the single issue anti-Jack squigs whose tweets have been posted here a few times. Very strange.
Btw, there’s also questions about money she asked for to do ‘media/presenting training’, non? Never mentioned again until she said she’d rather scoop her eyeballs out with rusty spoons than be on TV?Glad it’s not just me a bit frustrated by the podcast and article yesterday. Obviously we’re so well versed in the whole story, after the immense amount of time we‘ve spent here; but really, how hard is it to pick out a few key points and lay them out clearly?
- Patreon .
Jack advertises a rewards system ranging from £3.50 to £40(?) a month, delivering exclusive content, postcards, prints. Endorsed by Nigella. Hasn’t touched it since 2020.
- Teemill
‘designed’ a range of T-shirts etc. claimed to be working with Trussel Trust and would donate profits. Collected profits to her own account, even though teemill offer a charity distribunion setup. TT confirmed they had not been consulted. Jack then said further profits would go to other charities. Had to be chased to send TT the money. Refuses to confirm how much more was raised or where it went.
- Lee Anderson
Picked a fight with a Tory MP who claimed she profited from her cook books, and probably earned more than the Prime Minister. Asked for (and received) donations for ‘pro-bono’ legal action. No more has been heard, and no action taken so far (confirmed by other party).
- ONS, ASDA, Vimes Boots Index
took credit for changing / creating above. Not true. Confirmed by ONS
- Poverty
dubious backstory. HH2 - lightbulbs, shampoo etc. incongruous with dog, holidays, Tiffany etc / Compare with high profile jobs since start of covid.
Complete and utter lies and comedy
careful here! - this is what makes us sound like lunatics. Spoons, gin, teams of staff, roast potatoes, can’t tell lies, 101 illnesses, police celeb squad, rinsed hoops etc.
As Mike Winnet calls it "the bullshit back story" followed by "I made these changes, if I did, so can you"Nothing original here, you olden days Tattlers will have seen, BUT