She just about did that during the Hopkins case by deleting evidence. Jack is definitely not naive when it comes to covering her own tracks.I have to say I'd absolutely
if she involves the police and ends up getting done for attempting to pervert the course of justice after the guilty eye pee is traced to her very own laptop.
Jack Monroe #401 Is there a ‘blocked by DIVA magazine’ club?
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Jack Monroe Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Have any of you ever heard Seth MacFarlane doing the Liam Neeson Taken speech as Kermit the Frog. bleeping amazing. But back to Jack, is she actually bitching about getting up at 5 am? duck that poor baby. 5 am. No one ever gets up that bleeping early. Asshole.
Well that one didn't work.
She reallly does not understand how social media works.
I unexpectedly fell asleep this evening, now I can see what the universe/moon was doing, preparing me for another all-nighter Jachaos. Go to bed smol pixie, or you won’t wake up to shake on live GMB tomorrow.
That’s a nice pic of Debbie, Sidey B
That’s a nice pic of Debbie, Sidey B
Question, how does the relentless abuse compare to a similarly-situated known celeb? Because social media sucks, but a lot of famous people get hate mail for no apparent reason. Is Jack an anomaly or typical of a visible, political voice (however thin and uninspired)?
Yup the po po are on to you for that disgusting comment pal. WARNED
Yay legal jack is back, thats my favorite one of her personalitys.
Lets have a little look
1) someone has signed my email account up to Britain First - not a crime but it is quite funny
2) made multiple attempts to hack into my PayPal, Patreon, Teemill + website.- They usually lock after a couple of unsuccessful log in attempts right?, this isnt identiy fraud becaue no one is trying to steal....thats right...her identity. identity fraud is usually about taking contracts out, claiming benefits or passport stuff in someone elses name.
If what she is saying is true (it isnt) it would be attempted theft. If by some miracle the imaginary celebrity police made an arrest of this invisible person then the entire crime would be considered low risk (they didnt take anything) and low culpability (no planning, no intimidation...etc). If the invisible person was caught, and then also found guilty the punishment in my estimated guess would be about a band B fine....one weeks wage.
3) harassing my lawyer and agent - who knows what what people email? the lawyer and agent would need to report the harassment themselves really, she cant be criminally offended on their behalf. it would also need to be over a period of time and by the same person. 100 emails all from different unrelated IP address (this lie that influencers spread explained here) = not harassment, 5 emails from the same one could be harassment depending on the content.
4) The law is on MY side- the law is on the side of public interest and protecting the public purse
5) hounded my brand partners on social media to the point where I’ve lost paid contracts- she would have to prove she lost contracts because of said hounding and not because of her incompetence or some other legit reason. she would have to prove who specifically lost her the contract and that it was the only reason she lost it. again if 100 people email hellmans to say they are not keen on her, and they are all unrelated people its not a legal or civil matter. if one person set up mulitple email or twitter accounts then yeah maybe thats closer to harrasment.
6) made false allegations of benefit fraud resulting in me being interviewed under caution - 90% of benefit fraud allegations are false. investigation start out informal, letters asking for proof of this or that, who lives where etc, because investigators know they are more than likely false. if that informal investigation doesnt resolve the issue then it will be the interview under caution. best guess, she didnt respond to a letter asking where her kid lived.
7) made malicious social services reports resulting in me being investigated by CPS - she cant possibly know who reported her, maybe the school, could be a neighbor, maybe the gp since she was an alcoholic raising a child alone. not every social services report is made maliciously.
8) made false reports to the RSPCA, NSPCC, and Police, leading to investigations - again the police are going to have to put an awful lot of man power in to figuring out who made all these anonymous reports, harassment is legally defined as more than one occasion.
9) repeatedly spammed charities that I work with with harassment, false allegations, abuse and trolling - the charities need to report it
10) sent friend requests to my family and sons family members on social media to gain access to intimate photographs and private information- this one is a bit creepy, hopefully its a lie but id say this is the closest to any real harassment she has got so far.
11) posted maps online with pins in pointing to what they think is my home address - stop making it obvous where you live if you dont want people discussing where you live. you cant dine out on "livng in a crappy bungalow" for years then have a strop when someone figures out you dont. judges dont suffer fools, look at what happned to vardy.
12) asked publicly for ‘anyone who lives near me to come forward’ - id be more concerned about people respondng.
13) taken photographs of my house and published them online - is this even true or have they just republished photos she has posted herself? this is actual harassment if its true, if they have stood outside and taken photos which im almost certain they have not.
14) publicly speculated about my sons school and the route he walks to it - im getting repetitive now but she has to prove this, prove it was malicious and prove it was harassment by showing that the people involed have done this type of thing more than once to her.
15) chatted openly amongst themselves about how best to drive me to suicide - im presuming this only happened in jackland
16) send implicit and explicit death threats and death wishes- i dont think this is true either
17) made false allegations about my sobriety - not a crime to gossip or speculate
18) posted hundreds of thousands of harassing, defamatory, abusive comments on social media and online - hey shes talking about you guys
you think the police would have got round to arresting you all my now since its been hundreds of thousands of posts. i'll miss you all.
19) and now fraudulently attempting to gain access to my financial accounts by identity theft - its just regular attempted theft, not identity theft you melon
20) they have a dept that monitors threats to people in public life - no they dont. project alpha was about as close as they got to actively looking for crime online but it was really focused on london gangs more than baked bean "chefs"
21) Joshua BP was sentenced for racially aggravated harassment and stirring up racial hatred, he sent her some mean tweets about being a lesbian and she quit twitter for a minute or two. cant find anything online about her givng evidence but it was a while ago now
theres no money to be made in criminal trials jack, give it a rest.
Lets have a little look
1) someone has signed my email account up to Britain First - not a crime but it is quite funny
2) made multiple attempts to hack into my PayPal, Patreon, Teemill + website.- They usually lock after a couple of unsuccessful log in attempts right?, this isnt identiy fraud becaue no one is trying to steal....thats right...her identity. identity fraud is usually about taking contracts out, claiming benefits or passport stuff in someone elses name.
If what she is saying is true (it isnt) it would be attempted theft. If by some miracle the imaginary celebrity police made an arrest of this invisible person then the entire crime would be considered low risk (they didnt take anything) and low culpability (no planning, no intimidation...etc). If the invisible person was caught, and then also found guilty the punishment in my estimated guess would be about a band B fine....one weeks wage.
3) harassing my lawyer and agent - who knows what what people email? the lawyer and agent would need to report the harassment themselves really, she cant be criminally offended on their behalf. it would also need to be over a period of time and by the same person. 100 emails all from different unrelated IP address (this lie that influencers spread explained here) = not harassment, 5 emails from the same one could be harassment depending on the content.
4) The law is on MY side- the law is on the side of public interest and protecting the public purse
5) hounded my brand partners on social media to the point where I’ve lost paid contracts- she would have to prove she lost contracts because of said hounding and not because of her incompetence or some other legit reason. she would have to prove who specifically lost her the contract and that it was the only reason she lost it. again if 100 people email hellmans to say they are not keen on her, and they are all unrelated people its not a legal or civil matter. if one person set up mulitple email or twitter accounts then yeah maybe thats closer to harrasment.
6) made false allegations of benefit fraud resulting in me being interviewed under caution - 90% of benefit fraud allegations are false. investigation start out informal, letters asking for proof of this or that, who lives where etc, because investigators know they are more than likely false. if that informal investigation doesnt resolve the issue then it will be the interview under caution. best guess, she didnt respond to a letter asking where her kid lived.
7) made malicious social services reports resulting in me being investigated by CPS - she cant possibly know who reported her, maybe the school, could be a neighbor, maybe the gp since she was an alcoholic raising a child alone. not every social services report is made maliciously.
8) made false reports to the RSPCA, NSPCC, and Police, leading to investigations - again the police are going to have to put an awful lot of man power in to figuring out who made all these anonymous reports, harassment is legally defined as more than one occasion.
9) repeatedly spammed charities that I work with with harassment, false allegations, abuse and trolling - the charities need to report it
10) sent friend requests to my family and sons family members on social media to gain access to intimate photographs and private information- this one is a bit creepy, hopefully its a lie but id say this is the closest to any real harassment she has got so far.
11) posted maps online with pins in pointing to what they think is my home address - stop making it obvous where you live if you dont want people discussing where you live. you cant dine out on "livng in a crappy bungalow" for years then have a strop when someone figures out you dont. judges dont suffer fools, look at what happned to vardy.
12) asked publicly for ‘anyone who lives near me to come forward’ - id be more concerned about people respondng.
13) taken photographs of my house and published them online - is this even true or have they just republished photos she has posted herself? this is actual harassment if its true, if they have stood outside and taken photos which im almost certain they have not.
14) publicly speculated about my sons school and the route he walks to it - im getting repetitive now but she has to prove this, prove it was malicious and prove it was harassment by showing that the people involed have done this type of thing more than once to her.
15) chatted openly amongst themselves about how best to drive me to suicide - im presuming this only happened in jackland
16) send implicit and explicit death threats and death wishes- i dont think this is true either
17) made false allegations about my sobriety - not a crime to gossip or speculate
18) posted hundreds of thousands of harassing, defamatory, abusive comments on social media and online - hey shes talking about you guys
you think the police would have got round to arresting you all my now since its been hundreds of thousands of posts. i'll miss you all.19) and now fraudulently attempting to gain access to my financial accounts by identity theft - its just regular attempted theft, not identity theft you melon
20) they have a dept that monitors threats to people in public life - no they dont. project alpha was about as close as they got to actively looking for crime online but it was really focused on london gangs more than baked bean "chefs"
21) Joshua BP was sentenced for racially aggravated harassment and stirring up racial hatred, he sent her some mean tweets about being a lesbian and she quit twitter for a minute or two. cant find anything online about her givng evidence but it was a while ago now
theres no money to be made in criminal trials jack, give it a rest.
Given the ferocity of animal rights advocates, anyone posting anything online that looks like animal abuse is going to get reported to the RSPCA, guaranteed. And good thing too. Posting pictures of a sick disabled kitty and saying that multiple vets told her it would be kinder to euthanize it, but she was keeping it anyway - I'd have been on the phone to the RSPCA right away too.
Someone's set up a twitter account tracking her Patreon. Looks like it's been going since the start of the month, has anyone posted about this?
Sounds a lot like my brotherinlaw when he's on a coke bender. He wants to be escorted from the house to the car because he is hallucinating SWAT teams between the front door and the car.
Doesn't Jack know about Godley's ableist and racist tweets, or is she just choosing to ignore them like she did with Harry and the Nazi uniform.
Jack please stop tweeting and deleting. You’re up in 4 hours!
What an excellent post. I've learned a lot.Yay legal jack is back, thats my favorite one of her personalitys.
Lets have a little look
1) someone has signed my email account up to Britain First - not a crime but it is quite funny
2) made multiple attempts to hack into my PayPal, Patreon, Teemill + website.- They usually lock after a couple of unsuccessful log in attempts right?, this isnt identiy fraud becaue no one is trying to steal....thats right...her identity. identity fraud is usually about taking contracts out, claiming benefits or passport stuff in someone elses name.
If what she is saying is true (it isnt) it would be attempted theft. If by some miracle the imaginary celebrity police made an arrest of this invisible person then the entire crime would be considered low risk (they didnt take anything) and low culpability (no planning, no intimidation...etc). If the invisible person was caught, and then also found guilty the punishment in my estimated guess would be about a band B fine....one weeks wage.
3) harassing my lawyer and agent - who knows what what people email? the lawyer and agent would need to report the harassment themselves really, she cant be criminally offended on their behalf. it would also need to be over a period of time and by the same person. 100 emails all from different unrelated IP address (this lie that influencers spread explained here) = not harassment, 5 emails from the same one could be harassment depending on the content.
4) The law is on MY side- the law is on the side of public interest and protecting the public purse
5) hounded my brand partners on social media to the point where I’ve lost paid contracts- she would have to prove she lost contracts because of said hounding and not because of her incompetence or some other legit reason. she would have to prove who specifically lost her the contract and that it was the only reason she lost it. again if 100 people email hellmans to say they are not keen on her, and they are all unrelated people its not a legal or civil matter. if one person set up mulitple email or twitter accounts then yeah maybe thats closer to harrasment.
6) made false allegations of benefit fraud resulting in me being interviewed under caution - 90% of benefit fraud allegations are false. investigation start out informal, letters asking for proof of this or that, who lives where etc, because investigators know they are more than likely false. if that informal investigation doesnt resolve the issue then it will be the interview under caution. best guess, she didnt respond to a letter asking where her kid lived.
7) made malicious social services reports resulting in me being investigated by CPS - she cant possibly know who reported her, maybe the school, could be a neighbor, maybe the gp since she was an alcoholic raising a child alone. not every social services report is made maliciously.
8) made false reports to the RSPCA, NSPCC, and Police, leading to investigations - again the police are going to have to put an awful lot of man power in to figuring out who made all these anonymous reports, harassment is legally defined as more than one occasion.
9) repeatedly spammed charities that I work with with harassment, false allegations, abuse and trolling - the charities need to report it
10) sent friend requests to my family and sons family members on social media to gain access to intimate photographs and private information- this one is a bit creepy, hopefully its a lie but id say this is the closest to any real harassment she has got so far.
11) posted maps online with pins in pointing to what they think is my home address - stop making it obvous where you live if you dont want people discussing where you live. you cant dine out on "livng in a crappy bungalow" for years then have a strop when someone figures out you dont. judges dont suffer fools, look at what happned to vardy.
12) asked publicly for ‘anyone who lives near me to come forward’ - id be more concerned about people respondng.
13) taken photographs of my house and published them online - is this even true or have they just republished photos she has posted herself? this is actual harassment if its true, if they have stood outside and taken photos which im almost certain they have not.
14) publicly speculated about my sons school and the route he walks to it - im getting repetitive now but she has to prove this, prove it was malicious and prove it was harassment by showing that the people involed have done this type of thing more than once to her.
15) chatted openly amongst themselves about how best to drive me to suicide - im presuming this only happened in jackland
16) send implicit and explicit death threats and death wishes- i dont think this is true either
17) made false allegations about my sobriety - not a crime to gossip or speculate
18) posted hundreds of thousands of harassing, defamatory, abusive comments on social media and online - hey shes talking about you guys
19) and now fraudulently attempting to gain access to my financial accounts by identity theft - its just regular attempted theft, not identity theft you melon
20) they have a dept that monitors threats to people in public life - no they dont. project alpha was about as close as they got to actively looking for crime online but it was really focused on london gangs more than baked bean "chefs"
21) Joshua BP was sentenced for racially aggravated harassment and stirring up racial hatred, he sent her some mean tweets about being a lesbian and she quit twitter for a minute or two. cant find anything online about her givng evidence but it was a while ago now
theres no money to be made in criminal trials jack, give it a rest.
Jack would benefit from reading it a few times.
This is an interesting one considering her son can't walk to school from her house, something she made very public when moving back from London. Nobody knows where his dad lives because he's not an idiot doxxing himself every 5 minutes.
They're police not private security. I don't think her story checks out.
Check out someone who lives on the kindness of strangers white hot with fury that someone HELPED THEMSELVES to cash. And the arrogance of “I’ll let you know how to help”. Why should other people always help you Jack when you’re little different to the scammers you’re so angry about? People give you cash because you make out you’re poor and overworked and a single mother etc. Morally, that money was never yours because you got it by fooling people as to the reality.
She does but JG blows smoke up her arse so it doesn't matter.
Oh no, Jack. This is terrible for you...
//Checks Notes//
...if true.
//Checks Notes//
...if true.
- Status