Its that I have a problem with. You can use it three times, three day food parcels. The immediate assumption is dishonesty, the need to ration their resources from the dishonest poor, who also need a referral from the jobcentre. The smaller foodbanks dont do this. Most are run and set up by volunteers. You can have a five month wait for PIP, you can be santcioned for loads of time and have a six week wait for Universal Credit. It shouldnt be running the gauntlet to get a manky food parcel. The foodbank where i used to live you could go every weekend, and get a hot meal while there, people are basically honest and the ones who did that needed it. How with the structure of our benefits system can you justify 3 parcel restrictions, referrals from professionals only with those kind of cash reserves? Also they are linked to the Teachfirs and Frontline social enterprise models hollowing out teaching and social work. I find the Trussell Trust a bit sinister and see them as an arm to the jobcentre rather than like the foodbanks I know run by volunteers. Give your money to the smaller ones they do a great job in terrible circumstances often..Yes, I think their rules about limiting the number of times people could access the service were possibly defensible when they were a much smaller charity and austerity had really only started to kick in but it's very quickly become apparent they're outdated and no longer fit for purpose. If they're sitting on a surplus like that, then they're able to introduce small cash grants and increase the number of times people can access the service or waive that altogether. They could also look at recruiting from the communities they serve- possibly doing a decent well paid internship programme that would provide opportunities to for people to work at all parts of the charity to gain different skills and get a feel for what they'd like to do. That strikes me as more valuable than creating more 60k jobs.
There's a thread about her here, real whistleblowing stuff by ex employees etc, she sounds dodgy af.She runs Victim Focus.
Tries.to.get the victims.of abuse and assault help and guidance. Has written several books. All around a good person, very prowoman.
Not everyone agrees with her, she has her fair share of real trolls that attack her and her wife, which seems unfair, Jess does good work and gets proper trolls, jack lies and grifts and gets very polite trolls asking questions.
I know. My point being that he was not prosecuted for anything he did to her and whatever thrill she got out of him being questioned, she wasn't a factor in him being prosecuted. It was his far more serious harassment of Luciana Berger that saw him jailed. She has tried to centre herself in this the way she does with anything else that will attract sympathy and attention but she's really not important in this at all. If you haven't read Nikki Pilkington's article and Twitter comments on it, they're worth a look. She experienced far worse harassment than Jack and was notified when he was released from jail, whereas Jack still thought he was in prison because no one bothered to tell her. That's how unimportant she was in the whole thing.She's in his Wikipedia entry
Thank you--it's just called a shiner. It's not supposed to be shiny. You have to use matte eyeshadow/pencil and blend, blend, blend.
I should have known she'd take it and run with it. I'll sit on the naughty step for 10 mins xIs this because people were joking about the password not being delmonte earlier??
Word of the day is 'Growlerflit' (15th Century): one who appears to display their growler (fanny in modern parlance) only to reveal it was actually their thighs.You would never get Susie Dent showing us her fanny. Maybe telling us in the 15th century it was called a growler. Classy bird our Susie
This is so clearly attempts to freak people out rather than anything of any meaning. IP addresses IP schmadresses, such little meaning and bear no relation to someone’s physical location. She’s a scamming bully shitting bricks that her 5 fig pcm income is under threat, that’s the long and short of it.