I feel seenIt’s never good. And it’s very often not a recipe. Opening three random tins and making something that is an offence to creation is not a recipe.
I feel seenIt’s never good. And it’s very often not a recipe. Opening three random tins and making something that is an offence to creation is not a recipe.
Didn’t you know? Accuracy’s kinda her flex. Well, apart from when it comes to….ummmm….everything.I’d not seen this before Doesn’t she only have an honorary degree though?
Also whyyyy does she always say 5’ 1.7”, it’s such a pet peeve, she’s 5’2” in that case but just wants to be even teeny tinier
Ah, so only 20 days ago. There's still hope I guess.
I think it’s because she’s a lying bleepand either hasn’t sold any other merch or is pocketing all the lovely profits for herself. Speculation, of course.If TT can be transparent, why can't Jack?
Yeah she managed to make comic kitchen. Who wouldn’t want one of those dropping into their inbox every month.The whole postcard plan was badly thought out. Nobody wants that much stuff sent. Digital content with the odd thing sent in the post, for Christmas, would have kept them all deliriously happy.
I know she says she needs a camera man or whatever to film, you don’t, almost everyone on social media manages just fine.
BTW there wouldn’t be a recipe for the peasants pudding. Didn’t she just steal the other persons recipe and use cheaper ingredients?
People deserve to know who or what they are supporting. It could be a small southend church group or it could be feeding *homeless extremists. I know the latter is extreme but stranger things with people charitable donations could and have happened. All she has to screehln shot is £££ to x charity and that would be that.This is the thing - TT aren’t the main issue here but Jack will divert and use this as proof she donated but yet has been silent on the rest of the money and the other charities other than to say they asked not to be in the limelight.
people who are paying this money deserve to be told. the charities wishes should not take precedence over those who bought in good faith and haven’t heard where their money went. Constant reference to the TT in this context is unhelpful IMO.
Boasting about his cashosI'd pay good money to have Jack and Trump in the same room. It would be hilarious because they both have more or less the same personality but would completely talk past each other. So Jack would be whining at Trump about her Metro fanny pad and he'd just be giving "lol, gross what a loser" and boasting about his cashos. Both would think they were completely owning the other one but they'd just be playing to their respective bases.
That recipe is divine. Please send portion-o’sI'm so sad that the awful prune monstrosity was mentioned. I have just accepted delivery of ingredients for a sticky toffee pudding (Nigella's recipe) that I've been thinking about all weekend, and now I'll have that in the back of my mind. Condensed milk with water is not a sauce. Aaah!
Why lie for her? Are they really in a cult?She should do something about that. Like maybe, idk post the pancake recipe?
I'm still a bit dumbstruck by one of her flying monkeys being caught in a lie about actually cooking her recipes purely because Jack never delivers her promises. It's so obvious none of them have tried the slop.
View attachment 1591669View attachment 1591670
I don't see why Jack would not say, however I am not sure she is obliged to. People bought without knowing where the money would be donated other than Trussell. They knowingly bought a pig in a poke, you might say. All Jacks squealing (enough of the analogy) that it is no one's business to question her on this might be right. I think that Trussell was involved in setting up the paperwork/legalities for donations to other charities. I remember this from either Jacks tweets or ones from Trussell at the time. (receipts are on here somewhere, I will apologise in advance if I have misremembered).This is the thing - TT aren’t the main issue here but Jack will divert and use this as proof she donated but yet has been silent on the rest of the money and the other charities other than to say they asked not to be in the limelight.
people who are paying this money deserve to be told. the charities wishes should not take precedence over those who bought in good faith and haven’t heard where their money went. Constant reference to the TT in this context is unhelpful IMO.
She knows that if she's transparent about one thing she's got no reason not to answer about the other thing.If TT can be transparent, why can't Jack?
They say it with such confidence . Begs the questions - when and which charities? And how much?TT saying that the additional money 'will be' donated to the relevant charities is fair enough. I mean there's no evidence that is HAS been but fair enough.