I have a sub to the Times for work
I hope Jack picks up a copy today
I hope Jack picks up a copy today
Bad grammar is my aneurysm, but this example is actually dialect. Possibly Scottish, as I've heard the woman on Homes Under the Hammer use similar phrases.Also, learn. Your. Grammar, you moron. Either 'needs dealing with' or ' needs to be dealt with. Hrmpf.
Sorry, just me being annoyed at stupidness.
BRICK
Can someone put him in touch with Iqbal?Just had a look at Martin Dabney's Twitter, he's sent a few tweets today so has been online but no response at all to Jack's bizarre outburst last night. I imagine he's as startled by her demand for 240 days of public shitting as the rest of us are and is probably unsure how to respond.
You mean you don’t have one of these?In other news, I have a lot of cookbooks for work (insert red triangle here) and because I just love them. Out of all of the ones I have, if I were to describe any as an 'absolute banger', it would probably be total of 5 or 6 books. Ones which I could tell you the author, what they do and their history in food, the genre of cuisine, what every chapter is headed, and probably my top 3 recipes in each chapter in the book. I will have cooked 80% of the recipes multiple times over, and the books are in terrible condition because they have been used repeatedly next to my stove and have had all manner of ingredients spilt over them (as much as I try and keep them tidy and clean). Now they don't really leave the shelf because I have memorised most of the recipes in them (forensic!)
She just out and out lied and to not own up to it makes me wonder what else are you lying about and haven't owned up to? It's so stupid and so pointless. Really makes u think.
Yeah, I'm a female mendacious ninny. 5'7" and 15st. I'm just chunky.17t at six foot isnt really that heavy.hes just a bit chunky.
Haven’t caught up yet, but I’m not having some Tory facilitator gate keeping my politics? Many of us come from a very culturally rich left wing background, unlike the doyenne of centrist apologism herselfWomp there is it. No criticism of smol pixie allowed or you're a bad leftie.
View attachment 1586279
This sounds reasonable. Avatar looked very stock image as did another one who looked very similar. That one has gone too I think.I’ll tell you who I think was maybe a sock, £500 squig. Only squig asking for refund Jack every interacted directly and openly with that I’ve seen. Everyone else she ignores or DMs.
Handy how that squig disappeared just at the right time. Changed the narrative, everyone asking for refunds was a liar after that. Very convenient Jack picked the one squig that wasn’t genuine
Why is every article about her so nauseatingly sycophantic? Why did I let myself read the whole thing?Times Article Screenies. It’s VERY VERY long, very self indulgent, and I’ve just caught her in a massive whopper in it (about Borb) having only skimmed to make sure was in right order.
TW for multiple S*****e mentions Read with care.
I spoilered our her son’s name. Off to read it properly…
It was about a year later, but my comment here still stands (she was still the most trans person alive days before she began the Mrs Gloss phase):So she managed a breakdown and the Priory before splitting with Leggy!
This is dated Nov 15 -isn’t that when she joined Mrs Gloss Facebook makeup group?
It would be like I, Partridge: We Need to Talk About Alan but not written as intentionally comedic.That would be so excellent. I might actually buy it.
Thank you for your service @That Forensic ManI gone and done it but I'm not happy about it
Behold the sacrificial beans, I already feel bad because I'm quite fond of beans
View attachment 1586514 View attachment 1586515
Into the sieve they go, sorry for what I'm about to subject you to, you don't deserve this
View attachment 1586516
"Rinse thoroughly"
At this point I realised this is not only going to be a waste of fuel/energy but also a substantial waste of water because you have to toss the beans a lot to get ALL the sauce off
View attachment 1586517
Rinsed beans
View attachment 1586518
"Boil rapidly for 10 minutes"
The water turned this murky colour and I could feel them sticking to the pan
After one minute 'rapidly' boiling I realised that was already one minute too many
View attachment 1586519
After 10 minutes of rapid boiling I sieved the beans to determine if any simmering was needed 'until they soften', it was not
If you completed the second paragraph prior to taking the beans off simmer, as the recipe would suggest, that's another 10 minutes and they would probably have disintegrated completely at that point
View attachment 1586520
You would add these beans to the sauce, yum
View attachment 1586521
Squidged a few softly, gently with the back of a spoon, they're just complete mush
View attachment 1586522
My take away is Jack has either never actually done this and just guessed at how long you would need to boil them (but why boil them at all) or just wants them to be complete slop
The pan survived to boil another bean, after 10 minutes they were no longer sticking to the pan, their spirits were well and truly broken, along with my appetite
This reads like it was written in 1986. When was the last time this happened in a film!?
Didn’t think it would matter to Jack, what with owning 70 odd or something as noted on that FB make up group…
‘On my karate records’ has me . So Jack.Wow that article's long! Jack doesn't deserve all that column space.