Agreed. Also a bit ‘makes you think’ about how quickly the tone switches from fragility in the first tweet to defiance in the next. Very erratic.Like I say, let Jack provide pics. Why are we seeking out the perp? And possibly feeding trolls.
Agreed. Also a bit ‘makes you think’ about how quickly the tone switches from fragility in the first tweet to defiance in the next. Very erratic.Like I say, let Jack provide pics. Why are we seeking out the perp? And possibly feeding trolls.
Would not be surprised if that were Jack trying to drum up businessAnd in amongst the quote tweets we have this. He has only one follower though.
That's curious. Doesn't really match up with what Daubney is saying though, does it?Someone just tweeted this link...
(It's from May, so not sure if it's already been posted here)
https://lawdit.co.uk/readingroom/defamation-claim-filed-by-activist-jack-monroe-over-mp-comments
That account seems hellbent on destroying the efforts of genuine challengers to Jack both on Twitter and here.I'm about 99% certain I know that account (won't share obviously). It is very odd in a number of ways. That keep pushing until we find her discomfort level is disgusting, though I would say it falls short of what Jack is seeking to imply but still not acceptable. It's interesting that she hasn't screenshotted it or drawn attention to it because it's an awful account and would get the flying monkeys going ballistic, however it also retweets saner people and pinches from other Tweeters making decent points so maybe she doesn't want to draw too much attention to it.
I think it's just a law themed news aggregator picking up on a story from elsewhere. If that had been filed she'd have been honking the proof all over Twitter last night, like a triumphant goose instead of sending Daubney weird Tweets about tit.That's curious. Doesn't really match up with what Daubney is saying though, does it?
Part of why I'm interested in Jack is I am fascinated by the content/media ecosystem and how to make a living in it. And it's frustrating to see someone who had a lot of opportunities and has a big audience duck things up so badly for herself.Yes, but that's good advice, which is why she'll do exactly the opposite.
It crossed my mind.Would not be surprised if that were Jack trying to drum up business
I've never read one of her recipe books, does she just rinse the tit out of everything?Gently wash your tomato sauce off your tinned beans. Then boil the tit out of them for 10 mins and leave them to simmer for an unspecified time after that until they "soften". This has to be the ultimate slop, the platonic ideal of slop even. A slop so sloppy that baked beans from a tin are considered to still have too much texture ***even after being boiled for 10 minutes***
I am reliably informed that she has not filed a QBR ( I think that’s what it is) nor is she likely toI think it's just a law themed news aggregator picking up on a story from elsewhere. If that had been filed she'd have been honking the proof all over Twitter last night, like a triumphant goose instead of sending Daubney weird Tweets about tit.
Can you say more about why she's not likely to or is it just the obvious piss weak case and comments gleefully amplified by herself.I am reliably informed that she has not filed a QBR ( I think that’s what it is) nor is she likely to
Everything except her hands, it would seem.I've never read one of her recipe books, does she just rinse the tit out of everything?
Did he say no claim was filed or no action was taken?That's curious. Doesn't really match up with what Daubney is saying though, does it?
Pretty much, including her followers and subscribers!I've never read one of her recipe books, does she just rinse the tit out of everything?
she certainly rinses the shitshit out of your username!I've never read one of her recipe books, does she just rinse the tit out of everything?
Yes, and not just food either, she gives her squigs a very thorough rinsing whenever she can.I've never read one of her recipe books, does she just rinse the tit out of everything?
She rinses the tit out of everything and everyone. But in general in the rceipes if she doesnt rinse something, she waters it down cos people guarding off malnutrition dont need fats. I dont know why she doesnt just serve tap water with bits floating in tbh Breadcrusts floating in water sprinkled with fennel seeds. Add milk and its a white sauce.I've never read one of her recipe books, does she just rinse the tit out of everything?
His exact words were "No action was ever taken against Lee, nor anybody else". However filing a claim is action and Jack herself agrees it's not been filed yet and explained that she's giving them "enough rope".Did he say no claim was filed or no action was taken?
So the question of the money is quite serious then. I wonder how mch it was. That was a staggering number of people saying they had or were going to send money. Staggering.His exact words were "No action was ever taken against Lee, nor anybody else". However filing a claim is action and Jack herself agrees it's not been filed yet and explained that she's giving them "enough rope".
I already died from cringe yesterday, do you want me to DIE AGAIN? Can I have a piss and a sandwich (actually fish tacos as soon as I get off my ample not-Mediterranean arse and make them) FIRST?Sorry canal but I actually want Jack to do another song now. I may regret this statement.
I suspect the amount raised was larger than anyone realisesSo the question of the money is quite serious then. I wonder how mch it was. That was a staggering number of people saying they had or were going to send money. Staggering.