thread titleWhy you toot tooting?
Tree surgeon rooting
thread titleWhy you toot tooting?
Tree surgeon rooting
I would bet my house that she isn’t going with SB’s dad. He hasn’t got the means to keep her sustained in city breaks or Tiffany earrings. And if they were going away as a couple it wouldn’t make sense not to take SB either.I’ve thought for a while that OH is SB’s Dad. Hence ‘long sufferering’ #OHtruther
I've thought so too. I think some of her ambiguous tweets about him have been designed to make it seem like it's not but nothing has fully ruled him out. It was the timing of the time with SBs "other" family plus the Liverpool trip for me.I’ve thought for a while that OH is SB’s Dad. Hence ‘long sufferering’ #OHtruther
Hmmm. Don't think we've ever seen the other two engagement rings. I can only find pictures of the LJC rings. Poor Louisa - she'd have had to useI wonder if OH will not be mentioned again until some squig asks about them? Then we will get THEY LEFT Episode 5... Another One Bites The Dust.
She didn't even get an engagement ring.
I often think this about high profile people who respond publicly to Trolls. Why draw more attention to them? Especially when Mr T Roll is pointing out your lies, and so drawing the attention of your half a million followers to him increases the risk of exposure. Either some of them are socks for harvesting sympathy, or she's incredibly silly. Or both, who TF knows at this point?Does anyone else think that a couple of Jack's worst Twitter trolls are actually her?
Would be a great way to conjure up sympathy and if so.
I was wondering that, the ones that have the absurd arguments, no followers and sometimes delete accounts quickly.Does anyone else think that a couple of Jack's worst Twitter trolls are actually her?
Would be a great way to conjure up sympathy and if so.
I agree, it's often quite convenient how trolls seem to say exactly what the high profile people want to rant about that day, even if it's nothing to do with whatever said person has been tweeting/posting/doing recently. Or time their "death/violence threats" right when said person is getting a lot of justified criticism.I often think this about high profile people who respond publicly to Trolls. Why draw more attention to them? Especially when Mr T Roll is pointing out your lies, and so drawing the attention of your half a million followers to him increases the risk of exposure. Either some of them are socks for harvesting sympathy, or she's incredibly silly. Or both, who TF knows at this point?
I've only just caught up after all the tree chaos, but I have to say this has been one of my favourite grunks so far thanks to the thread title. Every time I moved on to the next page I was reminded that yes, Jack really did facetune the sky. Who does that?!
It also fits with the whole "someone maliciously reported threats against me" thing. Surely reporting threats is a good, kind thing to do? One possible reason you might get defensive and consider it "malicious" is if you realised there was now a risk that the police might see that you've been receiving threats from... yourself.I agree, it's often quite convenient how trolls seem to say exactly what the high profile people want to rant about that day, even if it's nothing to do with whatever said person has been tweeting/posting/doing recently. Or time their "death/violence threats" right when said person is getting a lot of justified criticism.
Apologies if this lands oddly as I'm doing my 6 am grunk, I wonder if Jack knows koalas are riddled with chlamydia? Perhaps that's explains the 'why me?' posts?Sex Jack had been up in the tree claiming to be a "randy koala" at the time of the incident.
Thread nomination taken from a longer post, written by the fantastic @Into_the_tunnel...she is sitting in that house blissfully unaware of her huge, bloated privilege.
Stop it! You're making Jack look attractive!
I would say yes. The guy who harassed me on twitter had 14 troll accounts and he's so like Jack it's frighteningI was wondering that, the ones that have the absurd arguments, no followers and sometimes delete accounts quickly.
Let’s face it, absolutely everything that she tweets about is all about getting attention. She is a prime example of the unhealthy side of social media.
I’m so jealous, when I saw them I had a dental abscess so was in agony and full of medication.
Oh Manc you know she buys them herself - she does the asking!She didn't even get an engagement ring.
Maybe she whipped one of her collection out of the drawer, as a hint, and they legged itI wonder if OH will not be mentioned again until some squig asks about them? Then we will get THEY LEFT Episode 5... Another One Bites The Dust.
She didn't even get an engagement ring.
Ah, what a good excuse for the book to be "postponed"AND he’s got an acknowledgment in the new book, whenever it may come!
Again this reminds me of a crime podcast I listened to where the woman kept complaining of getting threatening emails and the police couldn't find the source when the dug deeper she was sending them using her office computer.It also fits with the whole "someone maliciously reported threats against me" thing. Surely reporting threats is a good, kind thing to do? One possible reason you might get defensive and consider it "malicious" is if you realised there was now a risk that the police might see that you've been receiving threats from... yourself.
I might be overthinking that part though because the simplest explanation is that the entire police visit story was a work of fiction.
Maybe. But she sometimes comes across as desperate for another baby and he’s at least got that going for him. And I think the earrings and being ‘whisked away’ has coincided with her paydays from various work.I would bet my house that she isn’t going with SB’s dad. He hasn’t got the means to keep her sustained in city breaks or Tiffany earrings. And if they were going away as a couple it wouldn’t make sense not to take SB either.