Oh it's a long one.
Jack launched a charity tshirt shop on Teemill. The shirts had tasteless slogans. She said the profits would go to the Trussell Trust. She then decided money would also go to other, unnamed food bank charities, too. She got some flack on Twitter for the slogans. She said TT were fully on board and she claimed to have raised just over 10k from tshirt sales in a couple of days.
After a a few days it transpired TT only found out about the fundraising after the fact. They didn't approve the slogans. Jack had to backpedal a bit and said money up to the declared 'just over 10k' would go to TT and other monies would go to the smaller charities previously mentioned.
What seems like a lifetime later she eventually donated around 11k to TT saying it was the tshirt money. To date she still hasn't announced how much else was raised or who exactly it is going to.
AND - rather than setting up a charity shop, which would be a) free and b) compliant with fundraising laws by virtue of the complete transparency inherent in the Teemill charity shop setup, she chose to set one up as a private individual. Which means that there is no legal requirement to actually donate a penny to a charity, as it goes straight into the individual's account, or to demonstrate that it has been done in accordance with what the
gullible squigs trusting public believe was going to happen.
She claimed a ridiculous sum of money had been raised and TT were asked repeatedly if she had made the substantial donations on time as claimed would happen. Eventually, after a number of, as usual, ridiculous and expensive purchases and Nigella asking people to give her money, purely coincidentally, the secret funds that went from Teemill into her account precisely because she chose not to set up a charity fundraising shop, were apparently donated. she has, however, been absolutely silent upon what has happened to the other half of the money that would have gone into her finances. So they could have been donated as claimed but, as is precisely the reason why charity fundraising is so strictly regulated and organisations such as Action Fraud strongly advise people to NEVER donate to somebody who merely claims that funds will go to charity, there is a theoretical possibility that the money could still be resting in her account, gone to pay rent, buy more fillers or fund a nice weekend in Venice. That isn't to say that it has - but her decisions to remove all legislative oversight and transparency from the outset mean that it is a perfectly possible theoretical risk.