Omg your user name has me in tears! Welcome!It's def scripted, but I'm confident dear mom wrote this all by herself. She's the original word vomiteur (apologies to all mom lovers). So nice of her to applaud her one poor 'friend'.
Omg your user name has me in tears! Welcome!It's def scripted, but I'm confident dear mom wrote this all by herself. She's the original word vomiteur (apologies to all mom lovers). So nice of her to applaud her one poor 'friend'.
A chaos is incoming. It’s times like these I’m happy I tell my colleague to go home so I can sit in our office by myself watching it unfold.Surely a sympathy Jaccident cannot be far away.
Too early.The only thing she campaigns for regularly is a TV slot.
Actually IRL cackling, such a beautifully succinct put down. How can you come back from that?
I thought she was, foremost, a political commentator?
She needs to stop this lie about copyright. There are many copyright exceptions. You can always copy about 5% of any work as long as you don't use it for commercial purposes or make money off it. So IF (and I think it's a big if) a foodbank wanted to hand out 5 recipes of a cookbook that contained 100, you'd struggle to get them on copyright infringement.Babes you monetised tf out of getting your books into the foodbanks. You literally profited from it.
View attachment 1220195
She always does when I'm about to go to bed. Makes for a good grunk anywayWoohoo, she’s getting snarky.
Exactly, can you imagine her publisher just casually destroying any chance of further sales and Jacks entire career by suing a foodbank? Like everything else she says, it's an absurd fantasy.She needs to stop this lie about copyright. There are many copyright exceptions. You can always copy about 5% of any work as long as you don't use it for commercial purposes or make money off it. So IF (and I think it's a big if) a foodbank wanted to hand out 5 recipes of a cookbook that contained 100, you'd struggle to get them on copyright infringement.
Please tell me which publisher would sue a foodbank for doing that. Honestly, they'd have to prove that it negatively impacted sales (how? people who are using foodbanks are hardly going to have money to spend on cookbooks). Can you imagine the press coverage? It's ludicrous, she didn't have to do anything of the sort. BUT it was a great money spinner for her to suggest to her middle class followers that donating her books to a foodbank is a valuable thing to do.
If a foodbank was so worried about it, they could teach her recipes in classes. You can use anything for educational and teaching purposes. Also, last time I checked, Jack didn't have the universal copyright to soda bread or tomato soup made out of tomato soup.
Schrödinger's beans both toxic and not toxic. I'm going to publish my Monroe hypotheses soon.But but, but……..BUT…..I thought the juice from tins of beans was toxic, hence every one of her ‘recipe’ books telling everyone to slowly and gently rinse their beans????!!!
head.