Just another day in Jack Land, wouldn't expect anything less than a tit show
Thank you I've found itGot to the IGTV section, it's not on the main feed for some reason but it is in IGTV, see circled section
She’s shameless. Let’s face it, she’s done absolutely duck all in practical terms during lockdown. She only interested in something if it feathers her massive ego or lines her pocket (like the Hellmann’s thing). Whereas Marcus has actually achieved something that can be evidenced in terms of actual practical results.View attachment 156061
shameless.
And if she's going to be out and proud about body hair, why is she smoothing it into oblivion in some pictures?Sorry to bring this up again (not actually sorry) BUT if she's lost 2.5 stone (yeah, right ) and she isn't particularly happy with it, then WHY IS SHE USING A SLIMMING TOOL on her photos? We've seen it. We know she used it. On her hips.
I'm off for a little catch up .
View attachment 156028
That photo is so tweaked around the face that her head looks like it's photoshopped on to any old body. The skin colour difference is as weird AF. The dress and chest are in focus but the face is just, well, odd looking.View attachment 156053
instagram too. Story and grid post but no comments on the grid.
Bare sweaty legs (and more ) on the work surface again. Yuck Yuck YuckShe’s back!
I can’t look at this photo without thinking of Cristiano Ronaldo for some reason!She reminds me of stepford wives, as well as being heavily filtered. The hand looks really bizarre too View attachment 156047
Also why can she sit like this in her girdle but like this in her Vivian Westward?Sorry to bring this up again (not actually sorry) BUT if she's lost 2.5 stone (yeah, right ) and she isn't particularly happy with it, then WHY IS SHE USING A SLIMMING TOOL on her photos? We've seen it. We know she used it. On her hips.
I'm off for a little catch up .
View attachment 156028
I think it was more a clause that the kids wouldn’t suffer as a result of the insolvency agreement. Not elaborated on.
Katie paid out 107k in legal costs.
I’m going to have to read it. Will be interesting to see what Jack did/didn’t say about the children being provided for. If there isn’t a lot of information, where did her fans hear about it.Hmmm. Seems a little unlikely. They lost their home, so how exactly was Jack going to make that right?
I’ll confess I have mixed feelings about the Monroe v Hopkins case. Yes Katie Hopkins is a monster, anyone who can read knows that. However, the offending tweets in the Monroe case were NOT racist/right wing/offensive in the ways we usually associate with Hopkins. It was simply a case of mistaken identity (implied) - she suggested Jack “might” have vandalised a war memorial, when the perpetrator was someone else. If Katie were to be “brought down”, as it were, I’d have preferred it to be for one of her ACTUALLY offensive or racist tweets. Then a point would truly have been made.
That said, the judgement itself makes criticisms on both sides, including very much on Jack’s (it particularly criticises her for revelling in taunting Katie, and for mass-deleting tweets which might otherwise have been admitted as evidence) and is worth a read if you are interested. The judgement IN NO WAY paints Jack as a white knight.
However, the blue-ticks are wetting themselves about this judgement as if it was some great victory against racist speech. But it definitely wasn’t that, as they would know if they had read the judgement itself.
The damages awarded to Jack (£24,000) were actually pretty minimal for a case of this sort. The killer was the legal costs which Katie was ordered to pay (both her own and Jack’s), which were rumoured to be around £300,000.
It’s an automatic watering system.Is that an electric meter?
Now that is how you do a non conformist, unconventional, eccentric, individual look and lifestyle. Something JM would desperately love to do and be, but just doesn't have the style or imagination to do it. There are so few people that can pull off and live a bohemian, duck you all, life and Vivienne is practically unique in that.Vivienne was very much alive only a month ago:
Exactly! she doesn’t make cheap meals, she makes stupid, gimmicky, unappetising meals. She’s an exceptionally lazy cook and not in a good way, like not being arsed to spend 10 mins cooking her onions or making a white sauce. You wouldn’t do that If you loved food. All she does is complain about all the hours she has to spend cooking for the good of the poor people.Now I'm not saying this for sympathy, im saying it because even if you are living in poverty you still have taste buds, you still want to eat 'normal meals' even if it is a very cheap option, life is tit enough let alone being force fed slop that you wouldnt even use as pig food...
people in poverty deserve a bit of dignity Jack at least give them some recipies that portray that!!