Thread title right there
Thread title right thereA smattering of goop and a twang of lies*
That's.....soup?!Yikes! (In Jack's likes).
View attachment 853556
View attachment 853557
This is NOT what a dahl's meant to look like.
That genuinely looks like why I took the dog to the vets for at 3am last Sunday. Colitis, gastroenteritis and an infection. True storyYikes! (In Jack's likes).
View attachment 853556
View attachment 853557
This is NOT what a dahl's meant to look like.
It's a chunky tomato soup?Yikes! (In Jack's likes).
View attachment 853556
View attachment 853557
This is NOT what a dahl's meant to look like.
I am amazed she can go straight to sleep after clogging up your insides with that maggoty creation. Id be throwing up all night at the thought of the grub like beans.She always says she’s just drifting off when she claims to have done something she’s not actually done and needs time to suss the lie out!
Whats that weird blackish semi circle thing in the middle? Is it a toenail?Yikes! (In Jack's likes).
View attachment 853556
View attachment 853557
This is NOT what a dahl's meant to look like.
Thread title nomination!Mark Zuckerberg has been offline more than her.
Mate she reckons she’s a 2nd generation immigrantTbf (omg what have I become?) Greek is a difficult language to write and many people can speak it well enough but aren’t fluent in text / reading
ETA I meant difficult to write for those who haven’t grown up using that alphabet, obviously it’s not difficult to write for actual Greek people
2 pages behind so not sure if anyone has said this but part of the traditions is maintaining anonymity at levels of press, radio, and films which is why you’ll never have an “AA representative” comment on say, the booze tax cuts in the budget, or have an AA biopic in film? Similarly why you’ll never get well people writing the content Jack does, because when you’re well you respect the traditions and wouldn’t want to put AA in jeopardy like that. So it’ll always be a case of the emptiest vessels make the loudest noise, although with that said I’ve read some amazing recovery stories from authors but they always focus on their own chaos & how they recovered with AA just being a minor “and then I attended a meeting a day” rather than the plot point itself, as it is for JM. Even writing my biopic comments (I’m so sorry) there’s been times I’ve wanted to correct her with examples but refrained as it’s in breach of the yellow card rule!Would they be concerned if they were aware of her campaign of disinformation?
Must be so infuriating for someone like Jack.2 pages behind so not sure if anyone has said this but part of the traditions is maintaining anonymity at levels of press, radio, and films
Surely though, if she’s attending these meetings and not making it up (which is 50/50 at the moment) the group leader has a responsibility towards the people in the group for their welfare. I’m thinking about how I would feel if I had shared with the group and JM just decided to either put it in a tweet or a diva.pdf for her own gain and sympathy from people. There must be hundreds of ‘famous’ people in rehab or group meetings that we don’t know about as they choose not to broadcast it and it’s in the rules not to. People will stop attending, imagine going and taking that first step and being overpowered by Jack and her steady stream of narcissism, her experiences are worst - I can imagine the leader needing an eye roll reaction as she continually pushes her narrative whenever they’re asked for someone to tell their story. I would never share a thing with Jack in the group as quite simply she’d take the story and make it her own on Twitter for attention.2 pages behind so not sure if anyone has said this but part of the traditions is maintaining anonymity at levels of press, radio, and films which is why you’ll never have an “AA representative” comment on say, the booze tax cuts in the budget, or have an AA biopic in film? Similarly why you’ll never get well people writing the content Jack does, because when you’re well you respect the traditions and wouldn’t want to put AA in jeopardy like that. So it’ll always be a case of the emptiest vessels make the loudest noise, although with that said I’ve read some amazing recovery stories from authors but they always focus on their own chaos & how they recovered with AA just being a minor “and then I attended a meeting a day” rather than the plot point itself, as it is for JM. Even writing my biopic comments (I’m so sorry) there’s been times I’ve wanted to correct her with examples but refrained as it’s in breach of the yellow card rule!
Re what she’s doing, it’s always challenging when anyone’s behaviour makes a meeting not a safe space. Personally I wouldn’t feel safe in a meeting with her & would choose not to share lest my words end up in the guardian the week later (or was it 5 days?) and I would flag this concern to the secretary to safeguard people as they say gossip kills. But it’s challenging as they can’t ban someone off the back of just this, they would likely gently, softly request that they acknowledge the yellow card rule and not share what they hear here (or what they think of everyone in attendance) but they can’t police someone’s entire life.
Hello, if you are comfortable answewring, what is an 'AA biopic' and what is 'the yellow card rule'? I tried googling the first question but not the second. Thank you for all your sensible challenges of the riduclous stuff Jack writes. X2 pages behind so not sure if anyone has said this but part of the traditions is maintaining anonymity at levels of press, radio, and films which is why you’ll never have an “AA representative” comment on say, the booze tax cuts in the budget, or have an AA biopic in film? Similarly why you’ll never get well people writing the content Jack does, because when you’re well you respect the traditions and wouldn’t want to put AA in jeopardy like that. So it’ll always be a case of the emptiest vessels make the loudest noise, although with that said I’ve read some amazing recovery stories from authors but they always focus on their own chaos & how they recovered with AA just being a minor “and then I attended a meeting a day” rather than the plot point itself, as it is for JM. Even writing my biopic comments (I’m so sorry) there’s been times I’ve wanted to correct her with examples but refrained as it’s in breach of the yellow card rule!
Re what she’s doing, it’s always challenging when anyone’s behaviour makes a meeting not a safe space. Personally I wouldn’t feel safe in a meeting with her & would choose not to share lest my words end up in the guardian the week later (or was it 5 days?) and I would flag this concern to the secretary to safeguard people as they say gossip kills. But it’s challenging as they can’t ban someone off the back of just this, they would likely gently, softly request that they acknowledge the yellow card rule and not share what they hear here (or what they think of everyone in attendance) but they can’t police someone’s entire life.
Yeah, at one stage she recommended rinsing tinned chickpeas to "get rid of the toxins." Now she just slings the whole can in, toxins and all!Hasn't she previously said how important it is to rinse your tinned beans thoroughly? (It isn't but I'm sure she was under this illusion fairly recently).
That looks like a tin of tomato soup, with an added tin of tomatoesYikes! (In Jack's likes).
View attachment 853556
View attachment 853557
This is NOT what a dahl's meant to look like.
The squiggle made onions which are both raw and burnedThat looks like a tin of tomato soup, with an added tin of tomatoes
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?