The Squig sounds like she knows what she’s talking about too. Careful Jack.
Jack Monroe #178 I am a human being and I make mistakes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Jack Monroe Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I couldn't find the episodes but I see Marmalade has posted links. Couldn't resist sharing these thumbnails, cringe!
'Wild accusations' sounds like a quote. What 'accusations', exactly, Jack? That you got sent a testimony in 2016, which you asked for and never used? That you haven't been responding to further messages about it? That you haven't deleted the details? I mean, where is the lie?
The more she hits people up with threats of her lawyer, the less power it wields. I hope the squiggle is ok and takes it as far as they wish, without threat of intimidation by Jack.
So perhaps I was wrong then and instead of DMs with apologies to this squig, she's been giving it legal threatening Billy big bollocks?
ETAThank you @People-huv-tae-know and great recapthis whole hypothetical cease and desist threats from r Jackie is pathetic- she clearly has delusions about her own importance. Who knows or cares where she is right now but hope sb still with dad and not being subjected to second hand narc rage
Hope you are ok @essexgirl101 meant to add before but forgot.
I think you might be right. We are always trying to see the best in her and she’s constantly disappointing us!So perhaps I was wrong then and instead of DMs with apologies to this squig, she's been giving it legal threatening Billy big bollocks?
Well, she really is a nasty piece of work isn’t she.
Threatening people because you have appropriated their data then not used it as intended when given. I mean, you’re in the wrong here, no two ways about it.
ETA my narc sister gets really nasty when you point out she’s in the wrong. Properly vile. Coincidence? Hmmm.
Threatening people because you have appropriated their data then not used it as intended when given. I mean, you’re in the wrong here, no two ways about it.
ETA my narc sister gets really nasty when you point out she’s in the wrong. Properly vile. Coincidence? Hmmm.
Chaos grunk completed 
. Lord Jesus Christ’s scarf, that saga had me on the edge of my seat. As per usual, you have all articulated all of my thoughts already.
I said something to this effect when is appeared Jack was going to cosplay a long Covid saga (allegedly m’lud) & I think it’s becoming relevant again. Jack would (correctly) argue that she has never stated that she has a serious illness and certainly hasn’t lied that she has cancer or any other life threatening illness. However, making statements about her ‘current treatment’ being ‘exhausting’ so she requires rest soon after talking about lumps (she says she left too long) and CT scans will (rightly or wrongly) concern people who will likely think the worst.
She won’t have outright lied about anything but the language is misleading & she really needs to tread very carefully. She’s previously claimed to have illnesses and/or diagnoses that are very hard to disprove and has usually identified herself as part of groups of people who are marginalised so a) it’s hard to call her out without looking like a bigot and b) people don’t tend to care very much when people with those diagnoses/characteristics call her out.
It’s easy to say ‘I never said that’ about things that the majority of people don’t know much about or care much about. However, cancer is not one of those things. If people get the idea that she is seriously ill (particularly if they think it’s cancer) I don’t think it’ll matter to them if she’s never actually said she has it (so never actually truly lied). People will feel cheated regardless. It’s a dangerous game even dropping crumbs about something so serious and so easy to disprove. If she has any sense at all she’ll stop doing it.
Of course, it goes without saying that I wish Jack health and happiness. I sincerely hope she doesn’t have a serious illness. However, if she did, it would not make her immune to scrutiny and able to do/say whatever she likes.
. Lord Jesus Christ’s scarf, that saga had me on the edge of my seat. As per usual, you have all articulated all of my thoughts already.I said something to this effect when is appeared Jack was going to cosplay a long Covid saga (allegedly m’lud) & I think it’s becoming relevant again. Jack would (correctly) argue that she has never stated that she has a serious illness and certainly hasn’t lied that she has cancer or any other life threatening illness. However, making statements about her ‘current treatment’ being ‘exhausting’ so she requires rest soon after talking about lumps (she says she left too long) and CT scans will (rightly or wrongly) concern people who will likely think the worst.
She won’t have outright lied about anything but the language is misleading & she really needs to tread very carefully. She’s previously claimed to have illnesses and/or diagnoses that are very hard to disprove and has usually identified herself as part of groups of people who are marginalised so a) it’s hard to call her out without looking like a bigot and b) people don’t tend to care very much when people with those diagnoses/characteristics call her out.
It’s easy to say ‘I never said that’ about things that the majority of people don’t know much about or care much about. However, cancer is not one of those things. If people get the idea that she is seriously ill (particularly if they think it’s cancer) I don’t think it’ll matter to them if she’s never actually said she has it (so never actually truly lied). People will feel cheated regardless. It’s a dangerous game even dropping crumbs about something so serious and so easy to disprove. If she has any sense at all she’ll stop doing it.
Of course, it goes without saying that I wish Jack health and happiness. I sincerely hope she doesn’t have a serious illness. However, if she did, it would not make her immune to scrutiny and able to do/say whatever she likes.
She's having TREATMENT!Wasn't she saying mere days ago that she was self conscious of showing her unsymmetrical face due to the severe lump on her jaw?
Agree with everything you said @Anonymous One, you just left out when she did a shout out on twitter for an oncologist to get in touch. Think it's worth a mention.
And doesn't TREATMENT sound so much more dramatic than antibiotics?
All these Blue Tickers that she converses online with are not her friends like she thinks they are. They are acquaintances at best, most she has never even seen in real life.
She says she has cooked for the likes of Mary Portas, has met countless celebrities, she has worked with many household names (no I don't mean zoflora!), and she has socialised with the media darlings at the Groucho.
However, not one of these so called friends could she ring up for a chat. Not one could she drop in for a coffee. Not one could she meet for lunch. Not one could she go shopping with. Not one would come around to hers for dinner. Not one could she see a movie with. Not one would come around for an evening and stay over. Not one could she ring for a catch up. Not one could she have a gossip with. Not one would ever ask her to do anything with them socially.
She really doesn't have any friends, never mind cleb friends.
She says she has cooked for the likes of Mary Portas, has met countless celebrities, she has worked with many household names (no I don't mean zoflora!), and she has socialised with the media darlings at the Groucho.
However, not one of these so called friends could she ring up for a chat. Not one could she drop in for a coffee. Not one could she meet for lunch. Not one could she go shopping with. Not one would come around to hers for dinner. Not one could she see a movie with. Not one would come around for an evening and stay over. Not one could she ring for a catch up. Not one could she have a gossip with. Not one would ever ask her to do anything with them socially.
She really doesn't have any friends, never mind cleb friends.
Well she certainly won’t if she keeps threatening them with legal action.
This sums Jack up to a t. Ignoring the sad fishing aspect, she believes 100% that she knows better than any other professional. If she (or anyone she knew) actually needed an oncologist, her GP would surely refer her to one. Why would she then think she knows better than a referral and ask people on social media?
The past few days have shown that she sees herself as the new education expert and one that the twitter sphere should trust.
She has no educational, psychological or medical experience yet feels she can wade in, above those who have worked for decades in these fields.
Stick to bots and badges Jack.
We're like that cargo cult that worship Prince PhillipOMG yes! Kirsty, if you do read here, just to say...keep doing what you do!Gives me faith in the world.
Can't wait to see what happens next!
Isn't that all she does though she really is a sm influencer in that she influenced outrage and fist shaking and anything and everything without alot of thought. Her " apology" even said I didn't think and neither do the squiggles.
I do believe they cling to the early her when she actually was inspiring and perhaps actually did get to the heart of problems and helped if only a little. Now she's like the smol pixie like hulk, a rage of emotions all coming out once but instead or smashing furniture it's her sm presence and potential reputation.
Bet it's really grating her mushrooms that she can't blame this latest chaos on her cable of mendacious bullying ninnies.
It's such a disgraceful tactic as well. It capitalises on the fact that most people do not have the excess cash floating about to become involved with civil law cases. She uses the lawyer threat to get people to back down before she does, despite the fact that the laws of this country are freely available to read online and are explained in a straightforward manner by legal professionals in blog posts/ YouTube videos etc for the genuinely curious. She can't STAND the fact that I could say 'I think she's acted disgracefully' over orchestrating a Twitter pile-on and that would not be libelling her because it's a) clearly my honest opinion (honest opinion defence) and b) has not caused her/her company substantial loss of earnings (as any for-profit business would have to prove that a statement/s has/have caused a substantial loss of earnings as a result to damage to their reputation). If you're causing damage to your own reputation in plain sight on a public forum and most reasonable people would be able to see that, I don't think it really matters if I say I think you're a tool – you've already dug yourself a huge hole.
ETA: I'm now a well-known member!
Law is baffling. Law frauen are fab.It's such a disgraceful tactic as well. It capitalises on the fact that most people do not have the excess cash floating about to become involved with civil law cases. She uses the lawyer threat to get people to back down before she does, despite the fact that the laws of this country are freely available to read online and are explained in a straightforward manner by legal professionals in blog posts/ YouTube videos etc for the genuinely curious. She can't STAND the fact that I could say 'I think she's acted disgracefully' over orchestrating a Twitter pile-on and that would not be libelling her because it's a) clearly my honest opinion (honest opinion defence) and b) has not caused her/her company substantial loss of earnings (as any for-profit business would have to prove that a statement/s has/have caused a substantial loss of earnings as a result to damage to their reputation). If you're causing damage to your own reputation in plain sight on a public forum and most reasonable people would be able to see that, I don't think it really matters if I say I think you're a tool – you've already dug yourself a huge hole.
ETA: I'm now a well-known member!
In total agreement- this is why her letters and threats are so horrid. To the majority of people, receiving a letter like that would be absolutely terrifying. The language (let along the costs) are so out of reach.
(what does tort mean?)
- Status