And in work benefits for those people working in these areas is just another way of subsidising these companies. They make huge profits by paying their staff minimum wage, but the country top up those wages with benefits because no one can live on such low income.I hope this isn’t what about-ery, but considering she’s apparently WC and has all these fond memories of her socialist dad her campaign would be a bit further reaching?
The NHS is amazing there’s absolutely no denying that and this isn’t detracting from them and the literal trauma inflicted upon them, but there are a LOT of other keyworkers the centrist Twitterati dgaf about (see: when they all complained their cleaners weren’t risking their lives to clean their skiddies in LD1). Food & e-commerce have exploded over this time and millions of people in this country are putting themselves at risk of exposure to keep us fed and with the bits we need? No one should be on below the living wage working at either, but they are, whilst the firms rake in mega takings!
Jack doesn’t care tho she’d have happily got that Hermes driver fired for smashing one plate she had no doubt John Lewis would replace the cretin
If the companies paid decent wages, then the country wouldn't have to top up wages so that people can live, and benefits could be better targeted to those out of work, sick or disabled.
The benefits bill is so huge because of the in work benefits, it just isn't sustainable.