Knowing what we now know about gaslighting Al, it was probably him all along!Jen did have an account in her name and I think she replied to posts on here in thread one of my memory is right
Knowing what we now know about gaslighting Al, it was probably him all along!Jen did have an account in her name and I think she replied to posts on here in thread one of my memory is right
Yeah she did in one of the first threads. All passive aggressive responses to anyone that questioned her....nothing much has changed!Jen did have an account in her name and I think she replied to posts on here in thread one of my memory is right
He’s a creep simple as. He makes me shudder urgh cheat.This calendar bollocks is just beyond weird. Like seriously are you guys ok? This is not normal behaviour. The desperate attention seeking. Al to even do it in the first place says SO much about him.
True, you are probably rightKnowing what we now know about gaslighting Al, it was probably him all along!
It's unusual for a court to grant overnights in the week for a child of school age, they are very firm in the view that a child needs a stable base when they're at school. A 50/50 split is really rare in terms of court cases.He always goes on about having to fight for more contact and it’s just so stupid. He wasn’t interested in having more contact at first, because he had Jen and Ted and he was in a little bubble with them and he didn’t want Isla there.
also, a lot of children who have never lived with their dad don’t have over night contact and don’t split their time between mum and dad. It’s more usual for that to happen when the child did at one point live with both (past being newborn). So I don’t see why he makes such a big deal now about trying to get equal time.
Having been through the court process recently that is not entirely correct (18 month process) 50/50 access is becoming more common by the courts unless there is a serious safeguarding concern and regardless of if the child is of school age. My primary aged child is on a 5/5/2/2 spilt between me and his Dad (The 5 days giving each parent every other weekend). If both parents can provide a stable base, courts will favour towards equal access and this is something CAFCASS supports too (they were also involved in my situation too) they take each case on it’s own merit, so no two situations will be the sameIt's unusual for a court to grant overnights in the week for a child of school age, they are very firm in the view that a child needs a stable base when they're at school. A 50/50 split is really rare in terms of court cases.
Absolutely, every case is decided on its merits, and no two cases will be the same. I have to say though in my local court and certainly in cases I've been involved in (I've represented children in such cases) a split like that has been rare. But it definitely hasn't been an arbitrary thing, at the end of the day the court will decide what is in the child's best interests - welfare is paramount.Having been through the court process recently that is not entirely correct (18 month process) 50/50 access is becoming more common by the courts unless there is a serious safeguarding concern and regardless of if the child is of school age. My primary aged child is on a 5/5/2/2 spilt between me and his Dad (The 5 days giving each parent every other weekend). If both parents can provide a stable base, courts will favour towards equal access and this is something CAFCASS supports too (they were also involved in my situation too) they take each case on it’s own merit, so no two situations will be the same