"I wish IG would release a really well written statement that leaves no room for questions for the sake of their children. "
Me too.
Me too.
I thought that at first, he's already put one out. But increasingly I'm thinking another one now might be useful. It won't shut her up, but it would allow him to put his narrative out there, succinctly and one-off, not getting into a drawn out public dialogue. Something about how sad and sorry it is that's come to this but he felt it in everyone's best interests to divorce so that can all move on etc. ect.Oooft I REALLY don’t want him to put out a statement! (Not trying to argue or anything)
I just can’t see how whatever he says will be taken by AE and her gang as face value. Whatever is posted will be pounced upon, assumed, debated and picked apart.
Who is Ant McP?He must be able to do something legally to stop her talking, no? When Ant McP was divorcing was it not stipulated that his now ex couldn't blab or sell any stories (I'm sure there would be some!). I don't think they had a pre-nup either.
Hmmm I still think this would be a dropping of a boundary (which is in some ways what she probs wants.) If he puts out more statements then either consciously or subconsciously she’ll learn “I have to tweet x amount of times to get him to respond.”I thought that at first, he's already put one out. But increasingly I'm thinking another one now might be useful. It won't shut her up, but it would allow him to put his narrative out there, succinctly and one-off, not getting into a drawn out public dialogue. Something about how sad and sorry it is that's come to this but he felt it in everyone's best interests to divorce so that can all move on etc. ect.
Ant McPartlin. That's more than likely an NDA and there was probably some financial incentive for Lisa Armstrong to sign it. I can't see AE agreeing to it and don't think IG has the financial strength to add a monetary incentive
Thanks, no not trying to argue with you either. I agree this whole thing should have been done behind closed doors but her vitriol has gone for so long now, unanswered, and he has moved on, so no reason why a simple statement now would not be appropriate. Or maybe the judgement is not far away and the lawyers will wait til then and issue a statement. And then she can spew all she likes, she will just become irrelevant.Hmmm I still think this would be a dropping of a boundary (which is in some ways what she probs wants.) If he puts out more statements then either consciously or subconsciously she’ll learn “I have to tweet x amount of times to get him to respond.”
There is part of me similar to others think “well he has moved the goalposts by posting about him about BW” but then I think should he have to put out a statement for every milestone in his new life? He is not attacking anyone (despite what subtext AE may read into it) it was an update about him and his own new life.
But again, not trying to debate you! Hopefully this doesn’t come across as argumentative the thread is so much more fun when people don’t feel sniped upon!
This is the point I was trying to make , I was initially of the opinion that he should keepView attachment 844344
Thanks, no not trying to argue with you either. I agree this whole thing should have been done behind closed doors but her vitriol has gone for so long now, unanswered, and he has moved on, so no reason why a simple statement now would not be appropriate. Or maybe the judgement is not far away and the lawyers will wait til then and issue a statement. And then she can spew all she likes, she will just become irrelevant.
Indeed. Any new bit of contact or any statement made would be poured over for days in increasingly more desperate tweets.Oooft I REALLY don’t want him to put out a statement! (Not trying to argue or anything)
I just can’t see how whatever he says will be taken by AE and her gang as face value. Whatever is posted will be pounced upon, assumed, debated and picked apart.
I really doubt that her lawyers are this stupid lol. It's more likely like I said and they have a open extension due to it being collaborative, so you can forget about the whole 30 days deadline.Well if I'm right and it's gone to default, there could be legal stuff happening. That might take her mind off SM and take the wind out of her sails. I don't know enough to predict but the 6 months is up so nothing to stop him filing for a judgement. She might have suddenly found out that the divorce is imminent. I don't know, speculating here.
I think this doesnt really work in this case, when he filed he filed without any conditions but with the promise that everything will be sorted off-court, I'm pretty sure it's not what you believe here.
I give it two days max.Until last week I thought he was just keeping radio silent so he wouldn't fuel any gossip. Then the loved up post hit so I have no idea what his strategy is.
Alice didn't post a whole lot yesterday and the thread here was relatively quiet. It'll be interesting to see how long that lasts.
Alice would claim for everything that it's a lie, just like she called everything Bianca's friend said a lie, and then she would double down with more stuff. The women in that situation is generally easier believed in these matters, so he is better off to keep silent and let Alice destroy her case with her tweets herself. A statement wouldnt help him in any way IMO, those people side with Alice despite her changing the story three times per day, they wont change their mind no matter what he puts up.Hmmm I still think this would be a dropping of a boundary (which is in some ways what she probs wants.) If he puts out more statements then either consciously or subconsciously she’ll learn “I have to tweet x amount of times to get him to respond.”
There is part of me similar to others think “well he has moved the goalposts by posting about him about BW” but then I think should he have to put out a statement for every milestone in his new life? He is not attacking anyone (despite what subtext AE may read into it) it was an update about him and his own new life.
But again, not trying to debate you! Hopefully this doesn’t come across as argumentative the thread is so much more fun when people don’t feel sniped upon!
I btw find this very funny. Ioan allegedly body shaming is horrible, but this is all fine![]()
Alice Evans laughs as fan tells her Ioan's girlfriend is not that hot
Alice Evans has continued to find support in her followers following the breakdown of her marriage to estranged husband Ioan Gruffud.www.dailymail.co.uk
Really must be a slow news day
Has anyone ever considered that IG didn’t tell Alice anything about BW because she would straight up blast it on Twitter, Instagram, sell it to the Daily Fail, etc.? Before he could get it out of his mouth?I would imagine he did tell her or at least try to , it just doesn’t fit with her narrative . Currently it’s the AE tit show full of her contradictions/ lies and drunken ramblings . I wish IG would release a really well written statement that leaves no room for questions for the sake of their children.
Not sureWelp, I understood she had refused to do anything about the divorce filing? Under Californian law there are a number of options, collaborative being just one of them. She still would need to respond within 30 days. Even if it was just to acknowledge and say Yes we're working on it.
The petitioner then has the Respondent served [usually handled by the attorney who hires a process server], and once served, the Respondent has 30 days to file a response, unless the respondent is granted an extension of time to file the response. Where it is likely that the parties will be able to work out an agreement (or are in agreement) resolving all issues, it is common to grant the Respondent an open extension while the agreement is being worked out.