Edited as I got something wrong, that will teach me not to read all the posts.One of Alice's socks makes accusations about Iris saying that they have recordings of her being abusive. Iris was subpoenaed before the visit took place I guess to remove her from scene that was being hatched.
They said some terrible things, but I always got the impression they were a bit vulnerable. Most of the people who latch onto Alice are, in one way or another.That's so sad. It seemed like Deb was the one closest to AE. They both appeared to have tried to help her get herself together to no avail. I saw them as two more casualties of AE's campaign to ruin her ex.
My thoughts are with Lin who lost her closest friend.
MOO.
BIB who said this or did you add it inJust some Tam rants over Bifurcation Day and Independence Day LOL
Tam: who gives a shit about your sister? NOBODY. who gives a shit about T's sister? LOTS OF FOLKS See why he is defending her? my god you are dumb
Eh, dumbasses on Insta. That's about it.
Tam: Hi Bianca! I believe you. You've already showed your lack of 'restraint' with Ioan's daughters. Congrats, step-mom of the year!
Case dismissed against Bianca. Dumbass.
Tam: With $40 per autograph and a $1,000k per hour lawyer, he is going to need one!
She is mocking the ComicCon IG is doing. @screamin.lisa aren't you going to attend AE's one. Bet she will get no photos or autographs.
Tam: That's it. And the public sweetness vs cold private persona. Did you see the interview with CW's mother, months after her son's conviction, where she starts badmouthing the dead wife? Super creepy
Comparing IG to Chris Watts. Cunt.
Tam: That's so spooky. When I watched the Chris Watts docu recently I thought of IG.
Fuck off abuser.
Tam: me too. how can he say she was never kind to him? she talked him up all the time and posted funny family images.
LOL nope.
Tam: I'm sorry but you have to take Bianca off the table. She is a home-wrecker and a turkey neck
This was @ ed to IG and someone is breaking their DVRO. Hope Anne is on it.
Tam: I remember. She used to post videos of how excited she and the girls were for him to arrive home. Then he dips his wick in ole Turkey neck and I guess the next time it was "I don't love you but I SWEAR there is nobody else". What a classy guy!
The 'cheater' narrative is like a floater that won't flush.
Tam: Sigh. I am not involved in this. But no, Alice would NOT be sitting in jail today because she didn't nothing wrong other than to express her pain that her longtime husband suddenly upped and left her and cut off all contact. IG is NOT a nice guy.
In other words, "Fuck the TRO" yet again.
Tam: Also enough with the "Alice is harassing Ioan and Bianca." In their dreams. They are legally and financially abusing her. They're a pair of narcs and hopefully the world will see that quite soon. Maybe sooner than they thought.
Yeah, nope.
Tam: So.. what would have happened if she had continued to accept jobs? None of which shoot in LA. He wouldn't have been able to travel because you can't have 2 parents gone! He really pulled the wool over her eyes. Nasty man.
IG was hardly 'gone' as he rarely worked since the separation.
Tam: Not going to happen. ' I hope Alice will move on. But I hope those poor kids don't get dragged to the Cruella and IG house even one more time. And therapy? Give me a break. These aren't real therapists we're talking about. It's a racket. "Therapists" are paid to say one thing
BIB never going to happen.
Tam: Here you go. Note the words "Criminal conviction for DV" Also: "Criminal conviction for misdemeanor" AE has no criminal convictions at all. Jeez.
Not yet anyway but a DVRO isn't a good look either.
But according to Ioan's statement, Alice's lawyers did know the psychologist was going to be there, as they signed off on it.And not expecting I and B to have someone else was there as a witness, the smartest person in the room didn't work that one out.
Hi, I've edited my original post as I realised I'd got that wrong when I read further on.But according to Ioan's statement, Alice's lawyers did know the psychologist was going to be there, as they signed off on it.
This is what I don't get! She got rid of Iris, but then knew someone else was going to be there.
I also echo several other posters in this thread - is there any way we can find out what Iris was subpoened for, and is the subpoena available to view?
Well, if she can’t provide decent proof that she is actually giving Ella an education then Ella will be sent straight back to school. Alice needs a job fast. If she wants those girls for the right reasons then she needs to be able to prove she can support them & keep a roof over their heads.Alice is going to claim to be unable to be available for work because she's having to home school Ella. She thinks that the courts will award her money from Ioan to carry on this charade.
I wonder if the plan was for the girls to be completely disruptive and upset in front of the psychologist, in the hope that he'd report that the girls shouldn't spend time with Ioan due to "their obvious distress and unwanted to spend time with him" and the plan was to go back home for the leotard, so they could run in the house and end the visit - Knowing Ioan would not go near AE.Absolutely this was a set-up.
And Alice even knew that the psychologist was going to be there:
View attachment 2289035
Could even have been an escape plan the girls cooked up themselves - they didn't want to go to their dad's and cause a scene, so they thought they might get out of it by going home for the leotard?I wonder if the plan was for the girls to be completely disruptive and upset in front of the psychologist, in the hope that he'd report that the girls shouldn't spend time with Ioan due to "their obvious distress and unwanted to spend time with him" and the plan was to go back home for the leotard, so they could run in the house and end the visit - Knowing Ioan would not go near AE.
I dunno, just a thought! Also I can't decide if the girls knew about the overnight or if AE's plan was for them to return home for the leotard and have the visit end then, so she wouldn't have told them about the overnight.. I'm sure it will come out at some point.
Yes good points all round.Could even have been an escape plan the girls cooked up themselves - they didn't want to go to their dad's and cause a scene, so they thought they might get out of it by going home for the leotard?
It's all really sad, and I hope that any former reports made by schools or therapists will be considered, as well as the findings by the GAL. I have been wondering about why Alice brought up the Wagon Wheel preschool out of nowhere, for instance. Something went down there, and it wasn't anything good (for Ella).
If they don't get evidence of the sock accounts just even to build their case from every angle what he is dealing with, then I will side-eye his legal team. Alice is never going to stop, and going into their divorce settlement and custody agreement and also their DVRO they need to start playing hardball.I hope Ioan and legal team have proof that the twitter accounts are in fact Alice, otherwise that will be dismissed as hearsay?
I bet that letter Ella handed to IG was from Alice, begging him to come to the house so they could ‘talk’. When he refused, she hatched the RO/abuse/deportation plan.that norwegian site has now published pictures of that january visitation that they had already filmed. you can see in some of those pics that Ella tried shake him off by running fast into narrow alleys etc
The one where he waves goodbye from the distance after everything is the most heartbreaking one, reallyNTB Bilder og video
Landets største leverandør av visuelt innhold med et digitalt arkiv på over 300 millioner bilder og videoer.bilder.ntb.no
Btw, this is what I meant the other day when I said that shoddy reporter work really helps Alice, this one from us weekly for example is completely wrong, but makes it look for the average reader like the judge believes that Ioan is guilty. No TRO was ever granted let alone extended.
Thanks so much!It's reposted later in the thread; I had to edit it.
I noticed how some of the sock accounts like to capitalise RANDOM words for emphasis. Much like Alice does or did in her old Twitter posts / comments.I don’t know whether this has been discussed before, because I had to skim through some of the threads/posts when they were moving quickly, but does anyone think the writing on the LV sock account is Alice’s??? I think she’s tried to disguise it a bit but there’s little telltale signs.
Surely Ioan would recognise her handwriting? Any handwriting experts amongst us?
I wish they’d hurry up & investigate the sock accounts & shut her down, but then again the sock accounts reveal a lot for our benefit!
What stood out to me is that there’s a condition of the visit that he takes little E to her class but then “forgets” the pack her leotard. Then the girls repeatedly insist they go pick it up. There is no doubt in my mind that she was lying in wait, no doubt with a pap, to push him into a fight. He was just smarter and didn’t fall for it.Absolutely this was a set-up.
And Alice even knew that the psychologist was going to be there:
View attachment 2289035
Yeah I never thought it was an invite, I think it was a list of demands from either Alice or Ella.I bet that letter Ella handed to IG was from Alice, begging him to come to the house so they could ‘talk’. When he refused, she hatched the RO/abuse/deportation plan.
I wonder if either she thought he’d just be at the house, so would miss whatever she had planned when I went to the house for the leotard (which he didn’t fall for) or she thought he’d be a witness to whatever happened at the house too.What I don't get is that Alice's lawyers signed off on the psychologist being there. So she knew someone else apart from Iris was going to be present, and furthermore, it was someone who was a child psychologist.
Did Alice completely forget this, or not read her lawyer's emails properly and gave her consent for this without knowing what she was consenting to? Or because she thinks she so clever, didn't think the fact a psychologist was going to be there would hamper her plan/provide another witness?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?