Here are examples of ASA #Ad violations from Victoria's Instagram
She failed to declare this as an ad when the content suggests that it definitely is. It's a product shot, the brand is tagged, there is competitive separation (no other brands are tagged), the ad copy looks like marketing jargon and the brand is tagged again by account and hashtag.
This is something you would screenshot and report to the ASA. You can also check the hashtag use around the same time and see if other influencers are posting product shots and sharing the exact same (or similar) language in the caption. If so, it's definitely an ad and you should screenshot it (on the full feed view and the post itself) and report it.
Same with this post for Dior. It's an ASA violation that was not clearly labeled as an #Ad. This is something you should report.
How can I tell it's definitely an ad:
Here's another ASA violation from Victoria (I'm surprised at how many I'm finding). This is a Tod's collaboration with a giveaway promotion that was not clearly labeled as an #Ad. Tods is the main brand mentioned in the tag and the caption, which means she was compensated. And it meets the litmus test I talked about in the Dior violation.
She failed to declare this as an ad when the content suggests that it definitely is. It's a product shot, the brand is tagged, there is competitive separation (no other brands are tagged), the ad copy looks like marketing jargon and the brand is tagged again by account and hashtag.
This is something you would screenshot and report to the ASA. You can also check the hashtag use around the same time and see if other influencers are posting product shots and sharing the exact same (or similar) language in the caption. If so, it's definitely an ad and you should screenshot it (on the full feed view and the post itself) and report it.
Same with this post for Dior. It's an ASA violation that was not clearly labeled as an #Ad. This is something you should report.
How can I tell it's definitely an ad:
- Product shot
- Product name mentioned in the caption
- Brand tagged in the image/video
- Brand account and hashtag included in the caption.
- The language used in the caption: "Featuring"
Here's another ASA violation from Victoria (I'm surprised at how many I'm finding). This is a Tod's collaboration with a giveaway promotion that was not clearly labeled as an #Ad. Tods is the main brand mentioned in the tag and the caption, which means she was compensated. And it meets the litmus test I talked about in the Dior violation.
Last edited: