Ok Kim. I will do that for you at about quarter past never.
I’m not going to get bogged down in this.
We know it’s Richard
Would that actually be a "can't" rather than a "won't"? It's just that in my experience when people say they won't get "bogged down" (and other similar phrases) when it comes to supporting their wild and baseless claims, it's because they can't substantiate their wild and baseless claims.
Not a single point The Big G made in his statement was lifted from this thread. So your claim of a "majority and plenty more" goes from a very high percentage to a flat zero.
"We know it's Richard". Yes, I knew the instant I started reading the statement that it was The Big G, I had no doubts whatsoever and never thought that anyone else could have knocked this up. But that wasn't your point.
I don't think you can support your claim, as if you could have you would have done so. LOLs!
So let's leave it there and move the intellectual discourse forward!
I must say that I do enjoy reading your posts, tbh, and it's always a pleasure. I look forward to you next posts and future thoughts