Those 2 in the Sunrise clip agreed that there were 17 claims as well but I can't find a list.He keeps saying there are 17 claims made by H & M that have been disproved.
Is there a list of all 17 somewhere?
Anyone know?
Those 2 in the Sunrise clip agreed that there were 17 claims as well but I can't find a list.He keeps saying there are 17 claims made by H & M that have been disproved.
Is there a list of all 17 somewhere?
Anyone know?
17 sounds an awful lot.Those 2 in the Sunrise clip agreed that there were 17 claims as well but I can't find a list.
Oh he's a cert for the new channel with Andrew thingummy et al battering the wokerati and cancel culture.I get why Piers wanted to get his points across but I fear it might just make the situation worse.
And he says he doesn't know what he's going to do next for work, which means that he's considering several offers.
I think he'll be 'negotiating' his fee.Oh he's a cert for the new channel with Andrew thingummy et al battering the wokerati and cancel culture.
Not a doubt in my mind. It's like it was designed in Saville Row with him in mind.
He's just being coy and playing hard to get, the dirty strumpet.
11) she lied about the last time she saw Samantha and that she changed her name back to Markle when MM started dating JCMH. Sam has the receipts to prove otherwise....17 sounds an awful lot.
I suppose we can work out the disproved. stuff...
1] they were not married 3 days before the big wedding
2] Nobody made a racist comment about Archie
3] she did receive 'Duchess training' and wasn't left to learn everything herself
4] the British press did not print racist comments [the headlines were faked]
5] Harry was not actually 'cut off financially' because he not only has the money he inherited from his Mum [which he mentioned] but also the money from his Father and the money from the Queen Mother
6] she wasn't stuck in the Palace without going anywhere for months because she did loads of public engagements etc
7] her passport can't have been confiscated because she went to the baby shower in NYC and other foreign trips
8] she said she didnt know anything about the Royal Family but we've seen a pic of her outside Buckingham Palace and her friend said she was obsessed with Diana
9] she said Kate made HER cry but that's kind of disproved
there must be more......
10] she said she never googled Harry - we think that is an untruth
I would imagine she'll concoct something nasty and suitably caustic to say whilst attacking Piers. Typical narcissist.Sucky sex or Saccharine Sachs or whatever the duck ye call them will probably be on the zoom with a frothing at the mouth Smegs all night...... A statement of some sort I'd imagine will follow..... possibly a threat to sue? But he didn't state anything libellous did he? She'll concoct some sort of noncompoopery no doubt...
I HOPE she doesn't "miscarry" or be ill with "stress" over it. I wouldn't put it past her. Imagine the headlines "Rich White Man causes Victimised Black Woman to be hospitalised "
12) in dispute whether she made Catherine cry or Catherine made her cry - the flower girls scenario....17 sounds an awful lot.
I suppose we can work out the disproved. stuff...
1] they were not married 3 days before the big wedding
2] Nobody made a racist comment about Archie
3] she did receive 'Duchess training' and wasn't left to learn everything herself
4] the British press did not print racist comments [the headlines were faked]
5] Harry was not actually 'cut off financially' because he not only has the money he inherited from his Mum [which he mentioned] but also the money from his Father and the money from the Queen Mother
6] she wasn't stuck in the Palace without going anywhere for months because she did loads of public engagements etc
7] her passport can't have been confiscated because she went to the baby shower in NYC and other foreign trips
8] she said she didnt know anything about the Royal Family but we've seen a pic of her outside Buckingham Palace and her friend said she was obsessed with Diana
9] she said Kate made HER cry but that's kind of disproved
10] Archie isn't a Prince because he's mixed race
there must be more......
11] she said she never googled Harry - we think that is an untruth
bloody heck, Ive got further than I thought I would.
Only a few more to go.
Kate made HER cry. But she forgives her (like duck).17 sounds an awful lot.
I suppose we can work out the disproved. stuff...
1] they were not married 3 days before the big wedding
2] Nobody made a racist comment about Archie
3] she did receive 'Duchess training' and wasn't left to learn everything herself
4] the British press did not print racist comments [the headlines were faked]
5] Harry was not actually 'cut off financially' because he not only has the money he inherited from his Mum [which he mentioned] but also the money from his Father and the money from the Queen Mother
6] she wasn't stuck in the Palace without going anywhere for months because she did loads of public engagements etc
7] her passport can't have been confiscated because she went to the baby shower in NYC and other foreign trips
8] she said she didnt know anything about the Royal Family but we've seen a pic of her outside Buckingham Palace and her friend said she was obsessed with Diana
9] she said Kate made HER cry but that's kind of disproved
10] Archie isn't a Prince because he's mixed race
there must be more......
11] she said she never googled Harry - we think that is an untruth
bloody heck, Ive got further than I thought I would.
Only a few more to go.
Not to mention Charles gave them MILLIONS -- he didn't "cut them off" -- AND didn't they WANT independence????I remember counting up 11 or 12 but I'm sure Piers could give a list of what he considers fake or exaggerated:
- They weren't married three days before
- The "racist" comment
- Her kids were not denied HRH because of their potential skin colour
- Her kids were not denied security because they weren't HRH
- (snip)
Plus he is not dependent on St Di's money (blessed be her name) ... he has 7million from the queen mum. It's there for him when he turns 40, the lying bleep.Not to mention Charles gave them MILLIONS -- he didn't "cut them off" -- AND didn't they WANT independence????
yes i remember on Twitter verse, the sugars were saying how harkles don't want to live in their grandma's house and how it's embarrassing to be 35 year old man living at granny's homeNot to mention Charles gave them MILLIONS -- he didn't "cut them off" -- AND didn't they WANT independence????
I would like 7million to be cut off from family pleasePlus he is not dependent on St Di's money (blessed be her name) ... he has 7million from the queen mum. It's there for him when he turns 40, the lying bleep.
I read somewhere that Princess Anne administers the Queen Mum's estate. and that she has increased the age to 45 on Harry's inheritance. There is irony in all of the Markles stupidity.yes i remember on Twitter verse, the sugars were saying how harkles don't want to live in their grandma's house and how it's embarrassing to be 35 year old man living at granny's home
I would like 7million to be cut off from family please
joking. no amount of money can cut me off from my family. love them too much.
Just had a thought, if Oprah turns them down for tell-all 2.0, maybe Jeremy Kyle will offer them an interview they'd fit right in...