why wouldn't she be the next Princess of Wales? Technically, the current one is Camilla, but for obvious reasons, she opted out due to Diana
why wouldn't she be the next Princess of Wales? Technically, the current one is Camilla, but for obvious reasons, she opted out due to DianaSomeone in the last thread (forgive me, I can't remember who) said they were looking forward to William having a really big ceremony when he becomes Prince of Wales. I hope so too, because at that same ceremony Kate will become Her Royal Highness The Princess of Wales, and after everything that's gone on over the last couple of years, I damn well hope she chooses to be styled as that going forwards rather than staying the Duchess of Cambridge.
Love that one Chita!!! Magnificent!Here's a little picture called 'Crotch Goblin.'
Disclaimer - All characters featured in the picture are fictitious and any resemblance to any actual persons or real-life situation is purely coincidental.
View attachment 515425
After becoming king, Charles would have to make William Prince of Wales for Kate to be Princess of Wales. It's not an automatic thing you get just because you're heir apparent.why wouldn't she be the next Princess of Wales? Technically, the current one is Camilla, but for obvious reasons, she opted out due to Diana
Ahh yeah of course about the not being a King consort, is sort of like the notion of Catherine asking to actually be a legal queen as such and not a consort just wouldn't really make any sense in doing that, also with the signing of bills a bill to become law or be enacted must be signed by the Monarch, think there is a process of doing that (to not be a consort as such to the Monarch) but I don't think its ever once been used, also in the House of Lords (I dont know about the throne room in Buckingham Palace but I'd imagine its the same there as well) the thrones at the front the Monarchs seats about an inch higher than the Duke of Edinburgh and the remainder of them (Lords Temporal (Life Peers the vast majority of them the only way a hereditary peer can sit and vote is if they're ordered to by a writ of summons) and the Lords Spiritual (who sit to the right of the Monarch behind whats called the woolsack (least I think its behind the woolsack) where the speaker sits) and then the 20odd (Lord and Lady Justices (Lady Brenda Hale was the first female judge not sure if she still is)) judiciary sit in the middle at the front I think for the Opening of Parliament and the speech which is written up by the gov't and debated in the Commons (is something like about 850 Life Peers and about 650 MP's)There usually isn't a king consort as the title king is considered higher than a queen so it's always been felt that a king consort would appear higher than a queen regnant. The Netherlands had queen's regnant for 3 generations prior to the current King, their spouses were all princes, Prince Albert was the Prince consort, Margrethe of Denmarks hus9was Prince of Denmark and Prince consort depending on his mood.
You're correct, Philip was a Prince of Greece and Denmark but had to renounce those titles to marry Elizabeth which resulted in the curious even if him being Lieutenant HRH Sir Philip Mounbatten for a day before their wedding. Then of course HRH The Duke of Edinburgh and being made a Prince again in 1957
And I have love for Royals. Even though their predecessors ruled us for like more than 200 years, I have no qualms against the current Royals. Also, I share my birthday with Queen's coronation.Sorry I didn't mean to come across as sarcasticI see you come from India - why would you know?
Yeah right with that coincidental thing hahaHere's a little picture called 'Crotch Goblin.'
Disclaimer - All characters featured in the picture are fictitious and any resemblance to any actual persons or real-life situation is purely coincidental.
View attachment 515425
A Queen Consort is the wife of a reigning monarch. All Queens married to Kings have been - strictly speaking - Queen Consorts it’s just we don’t usual bother to voice the consort bit. I am not sure what you mean by Catherine “asking to be a legal queen”, She will be a “legal queen” automatically since she’ll be the spouse of a king.Like one thing I have to say to be fair she (Meghan I mean precisely) was in certain was treated a lot worse than Catherine ever was like the comparisons of holding the bump when she was yeah pregnant by comparison to Catherine not sure which one when Catherine was pregnant with then though, that was really unfair (nothing compared to though what Sarah Fergusson got (excuse spelling of her second name as I can never remember that), rather was nicknamed by the press the Duchess of Pork due to her binge essentially I think eating of pork sausages when her parents divorce I think it was, then again when her one to Andrew was going through the exact same thing is when I think they slapped that nickname on her
But then she didnt least I dont think she helped herself whatsoever gave the press rounds of ammunition by essentially stating about political beliefs outright saying about who to win the US election etc or whatever it was, I mean though Charles has done similar things in the past but more about issues rather maybe not I dont know if political or not though to be quite honest, not to mention taking a paper to court there's this outright thing they abide by or are meant to 'don't complain don't explain' if there's anything inaccurate about anything thats in the press they just ignore it and if they do something blatantly out of line they apologise for it officially through the palaces but then dont explain it since that could be seen as trying to defend or they could run into the mistake of trying to defend least sometimes the indefensible
Ahh yeah of course about the not being a King consort, is sort of like the notion of Catherine asking to actually be a legal queen as such and not a consort just wouldn't really make any sense in doing that, also with the signing of bills a bill to become law or be enacted must be signed by the Monarch, think there is a process of doing that (to not be a consort as such to the Monarch) but I don't think its ever once been used, also in the House of Lords (I dont know about the throne room in Buckingham Palace but I'd imagine its the same there as well) the thrones at the front the Monarchs seats about an inch higher than the Duke of Edinburgh and the remainder of them (Lords Temporal (Life Peers the vast majority of them the only way a hereditary peer can sit and vote is if they're ordered to by a writ of summons) and the Lords Spiritual (who sit to the right of the Monarch behind whats called the woolsack (least I think its behind the woolsack) where the speaker sits) and then the 20odd (Lord and Lady Justices (Lady Brenda Hale was the first female judge not sure if she still is)) judiciary sit in the middle at the front I think for the Opening of Parliament and the speech which is written up by the gov't and debated in the Commons (is something like about 850 Life Peers and about 650 MP's)
And they don't WANT to be a part of the racist tight fisted meanie family anyway. They've been quite vocal about it!I agree, they don't deserve them at all
What is clear from this clip is how much of an involved mother Kate is. She knows how to comfort her children and her children clearly know to come to her for comfort. I can only talk about the duck rabbit video from last year, where it felt like Archie and Meghanlomaniac were strangers: you can't see that there is a bond there. If those pictures from that little guy which have been unearthed indicate that he is Archie's body double, then the lack of bond makes sense.He is an idiot, but I think in this clip he was talking with Will.
Thank you @Rubythefirebat and @Baguette.I can see Piers interview backfiring on him, he is a privileged white bloke with a grudge against her for rejecting him (rather than a bloke who knew her and experienced Markling) in the eyes of some.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Although I relish the idea that Hazbeen and Megs will see it!!
Megs:Harry I’ve just tried to drawn some cash out but the transfer from your account was not madeYou know what they say "Revenge is a dish best served cold". The BRF will act when MM is least expecting it.
I think there have been those since 1301! I’m Welsh by blood and I have relatives who still harbour resentments towards Edward I and mourn the murders of the last true Welsh princes! The Welsh have long memories! But most people I know quite like Charles and especially like William since he was the first royal to live in Wales since Henry Tudor.There have been rumblings in Wales that they don’t want a Prince anymore, being automatically the heir to the throne. Will see if it happens, I think it still might.
I loved this so muchA doggie diversion from c. 1994. Sorry - off topic but İ love the way the corgis keep popping out of the car like rabbits out of a hat....
Like one thing I have to say to be fair she (Meghan I mean precisely) was in certain was treated a lot worse than Catherine ever was like the comparisons of holding the bump when she was yeah pregnant by comparison to Catherine not sure which one when Catherine was pregnant with then though, that was really unfair
Agree too. But there are surely grounds to strip Hazzno of both his title and place in line to the Throne on the grounds that he has brought the Monarchy into disrepute? Hazzno, not Minge as she is irrelevant. If by their silence BP precipitate H&M into releasing more footage or dragging Andrew/Epstein in they will have more ammo still. Maybe this is what they are waiting for. Hazzno needs to be excised completely legally because as long as he's close as a family member he's got leverage, and the proof of this is how he is using that leverage on a daily basis against his family.I agree, they don't deserve them at all
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?