I believe Archie is real. But I don't believe that is Archie in those photos. I reckon she had paps booked and this walk down the path was nothing more than a photo op.
That's my take on it. I despise Ginge and Whinge but I do believe they managed to create a sprog.How they did it could be up for debate though.
First, she's 42 not 38 and I wouldn't be surprised if a clinic visit or 10 was involved.
Also, when the announcement of his birth was posted on the gates of Buckingham Palace it was not signed by any doctors. That's unheard of , the doctors are always named and they sign off the announcement.It's always been protocol.
My theory is that because they used outside help to achieve Archie they didn't want the usual Royal doctors in on the procedure so used the ones who helped them get pregnant instead. The problem is that if they had named
those doctors then they could be traced as working for/with a fertility clinic and Whinge wouldn't want what some might class that 'imperfection' revealed to be gossiped about. Their perfect family must appear as God's natural gift blessing their union, not as a carefully controlled and assisted event.They have to prolong the fairy tale crap.
I honestly think they've been hugely lucky to achieve Archie(many are less fortunate in that lottery).She's no spring chicken and he's been putting it about for years without getting caught in a paternity suit. I doubt they'll be arsed going through that again now that they are no longer under the protection intrusion-wise of the RF. Publications like the national enquirer would be on it like flies on shite. Just my theory.