Harry & Meghan #56 All aboard! It’s Friar Tuck, grifting hard to make a buck

[Bloody orange Hell]

Richard Palmer pointing to a statement in The Times,

I love Kate but....does her face look a bit odd here? Like she has started with the fillers? I’m hoping it is just a bad photo.

 

[Jusa]

she's still following me. I wasn't going to post her tweets but because she's on private I wanted to respect her tweets. Don't want anyone trying to sue me

She's still following me too, and like you, I didn't want to post her tweets for the same reason

I can't love this version enough.
Is it weird that I literally sang that right through in my head?
Well done Wu.

So did I

 

[Nannyto2]

Slimy Smeg slithers out of shit again

Can’t wait to see an image if this lol

 

[FrostyChops]

Errr what other evidence is there this kid is theirs other than they look a little alike?

I mean how many billions of people in this world? Some of us are bound to look alike. Some of us have the same ancestry but don't know it.

 

[Margot1977]

“I’m just a girl, lying in front of a camera, begging for attention”

I see we have quite a few Notting Hill fans on here

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

Cunts broke me.

OMG Is this Warby sans wig, and she's just flashed her Minge at him??? It looks like Hizonner...

 

[StrawberrySeed]

How did mummy and smeggy grift people? (I'm not disputing they did, wanna know the hustle lol)

Yes I want to know how they manage to get people to jump through hoops! Is it the suggestion of sexual favours? I have no idea and wouldn’t know where to start. I end up looking very foolish AND rejected

 

[JAR21]

Can ANL insist the copyright part goes to court or is that down the Mrs Debarkle?

Can ANL insist the other contributors provide how much input they had into the letter?

How can anyone prove having her letter in the paper generated more income and therefore her percentage share?

 

[Margot1977]

I'm not a huge fan of the royal family myself but I certainly wouldn't want the royal family to be replaced by a President..... unless it's my mate here
View attachment 432652

What is my cat doing there???

 

[LadyMuck]

I'm sure I read something somewhere that stated M was determined to see it through to the end re the court case

 

[StrawberrySeed]

i completely agree, it’s annoying. I’m just assuming that someone would defo have found out and mentioned it by now if the word Markle had been erased as well.

I am sure I have seen the full amended certificate somewhere and the name MARKLE is indeed left in the surname box. Wonder why?

 

[rainyfaces]

I don't see how. No doctor would ever break confidentiallity. And any higher risk would have been covered by her geriatric pregnancy.

I just reckon the kind of obstetric team the Queen and Kate had would be a lot more traditional and formal than the Californian doula-like hipster birth Meghan seems the kind for. Women really vary so much in their birthing desires, I can see benign reasons Meghan got a new team in, but the whole thing gets so strange I also would believe most things at this point. It is sometimes possible to tell if women have had kids before but not always, especially if they never delivered full term. I highly doubt anyone goes inspecting royal brides for fertility in this day and age - that would be assault lol.

 

[NotDumbNotBlonde]

(From the judgment)

120. My central conclusions can be summarised in three sentences. The People Article did portray the Letter in a way that was inaccurate, and that would have justified some steps to ensure the true position was made known to those who had been misled. But it is obviously wrong for the defendant to suggest that the inaccuracies in the 25 words of the People Article which they quote in paragraph 15.9 of their Defence made it necessary and proportionate for it to publish the bulk of the contents of the Letter in the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline, for the purposes they identify (or any other purpose), without notice to the claimant. What was done was precipitate, largely irrelevant to any legitimate aim, and – making the fullest allowance for editorial judgment - wholly disproportionate

Reading through this, Warby is saying something along the lines that if ANL had written this story and quoted less extensively, he would have allowed it. Too much of the 'private letter' was used. So Thomas Markle taking the letter to ANL to defend himself was OK, ANL publishing a story to clearing his name of the criticisms implied in the People story was OK, but the amount of the letter that ANL used was their legal downfall.

Warby goes on to say

125. I would accept that, in principle, it was legitimate for Mr Markle to seek to rebut the inaccurate suggestion that the Letter represented some form of “olive branch”....

Thank you! that makes sense. So we can hate the Mail too! (Always have done, misogynistic gits that they are) by overegging the pudding they did Thomas a disservice and played right into Snarkle's greedy green hands.

 

[Pixie06]

When was the last time she was seen in public?

 

[Just_me1954]

Did she really win?

Did she really "win" considering 2 out of 3 of the issues she was seeking damages for is still going to trial? http://www.quora.com/The-D...

Did she really "win" considering 2 out of 3 of the issues she was seeking damages for is still going to trial? http://www.quora.com/The-Duchess-of-Sussex-has-won-her-privacy-case-against-the-Mail-on-Sunday-What-do-all-those-who-said-she-would-lose-think-now/answer/Ann-Lewis-222

www.quora.com

 

[Cunderthunt]

MMs boyfriend at 16-17 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...Markle-beams-joy-poses-boyfriend-aged-16.html

View attachment 435434

Bless him... punching a bit above his weight there.

 

[DandyTandy]

Diane Meghan Ruth. She will most likely leave the queen's name out bc she is a c***. She still gotta put herself in the name somehow. Archie was Harry's son. this one got to say Meghan's daughter in it somehow, in case anyone has doubts

we should have a voting poll for the names in the next thread

 

[mylifeisasillymoviefail]

How is it that the Telegraph have published the letter in full? Does this mean that other papers can if it's now public?

They've published what was in the judgement. Behind a pay wall if you read the telegraph

 

[Chum]

Oh goodness...Notting Hill vibe (the movie)

My favourite movie, and literally my first thought when I saw the photo

 

[ResidentMerkin]

'Cowering' Carolyn Durand writes 1500 words of dribble about Harkles and Biden special relationship based on that one time Hazza sat next to Dr Jill Biden 8 years ago...

Inside Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan's Relationship With President Joe Biden and VP Kamala Harris

The four have a long history.

www.elle.com

Meanwhile actual stuff happens in the real world

let's see if I can put a link to an article without messing it up as badly as I did with the MarkleNews Insta post

John Kerry Took Private Jet to Accept Environmental Award, Called It 'Only Choice for Somebody Like Me'

John Kerry has never been known for his honesty or consistency, but he's really outdone himself with this latest example of climate hypocrisy.

www.westernjournal.com