Harry & Meghan #438 it's life, Jam, but not as we know it.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I wonder are they packing Tom Bradby for the trip- ya know there’s no place better than Africa to tell the world how hard THEY ( multimillionaires) have it - are we due lip quivering- one tear left eye - and a “No one asks if I’m ok” -
Bradby would be there like a rat up a drainpipe
I hope someone's lined up the Nigerian president to ask ILBW how she is or the 💩 will hit the fan
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 34
Nigeria sounds an odd choice for a couple who are so worried about security!! And it also feels an odd place to suggest for the Invictus games, can you imagine how secure it will be for ex soldiers who are injured?

I hope they enjoy their visit! I would hate to visit Nigeria, from talking to people who have moved here, it sounds a totally corrupt and old fashioned society. A patriarchial society where family is key. If Megsie says the wrong thing to the wrong person, she could end up in a lot of trouble!!!
Michael Palin has a new travel series on Nigeria on C5 and I haven’t watched it as like you I would never visit. I also associate it with horrible scammers which I suppose would suit the Duck of Sussex and wife.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 33
Just seen this, great news ❤
Off to catch up, but really not liking what I skim read about Catherine being very poorly 😔
Screenshot_20240429-190311.png
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 50
There is no way that Nigeria invited them without Charles' approval.
Of course not. Ditto no way Harald could use St Paul's Cathedral as a PR platform without his father's consent. This is what enabling is, and Chuck is the source of it all.
Everybody who has an account on X needs to go to this grandiose PR tweet and point out they should delete it as THE Markle’s are NOT HRHs. End of.
It's not our job to complain that they're still using their RF connections, titles and HRH to grift and cause trouble, not our job to complain that the rules are being broken. Writing to the Palace is a waste of time as many have done this and not even had an acknowledgement. George is taking the pee telling us to put pen to paper.
As Bookworm's pointed out countless times, the Ho will not stop until she is stopped.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 33
Of course not. Ditto no way Harald could use St Paul's Cathedral as a PR platform without his father's consent. This is what enabling is, and Chuck is the source of it all.

It's not our job to complain that they're still using their RF connections, titles and HRH to grift and cause trouble, not our job to complain that the rules are being broken. Writing to the Palace is a waste of time as many have done this and not even had an acknowledgement. George is taking the pee telling us to put pen to paper.
As Bookworm's pointed out countless times, the Ho will not stop until she is stopped.
Your last line is spot on… until she is Stopped… How ridiculous does it look … she has a Title - gifted in the UK- named after a UK location yet the Duchess of Sussex won’t even set foot in the country ( never mind the county) - happily clings onto the title though… she is sticking 2 fingers up bypassing the UK to get to Nigeria( not that anyone is upset by that) if the UK is so beneath her- remove the title and distance her permanently ( no I don’t want her to be Princess Henry either- Mrs Commoner will do)
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39
Of course not. Ditto no way Harald could use St Paul's Cathedral as a PR platform without his father's consent. This is what enabling is, and Chuck is the source of it all.

It's not our job to complain that they're still using their RF connections, titles and HRH to grift and cause trouble, not our job to complain that the rules are being broken. Writing to the Palace is a waste of time as many have done this and not even had an acknowledgement. George is taking the pee telling us to put pen to paper.
As Bookworm's pointed out countless times, the Ho will not stop until she is stopped.
permission to use St Pauls would be given by the Dean , possibly after discussion with the Bishop of London.
It doesn't nee Royal Assent.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39
Did we already see this gem?




Maybe if you hadn't taken every opportunity to go after their mother, eh, Smeg?

The Wales kids won't trust yours, and why on earth should they?

It's creepy how The Lie becomes the established truth with repetition and programming, and this is a prime example. Here we have Tom Quinn, a Royal Commentator and Author telling us outright lies. They all are, George, Hardman, Bond, every one of them in every article every day, royal experts and sources all saying the same thing.

They spout the party line without exception**, that these unknown children are the Waleses legitimate cousins. They are a Prince and Princess of the Realm and legitimately in our LoS. Nobody questions it..... Drip drip. Scam of the century and they're all in on it, and George saying it's all down to press fear of the litigious Stoats is stupid beyond words.

I suspect George's reputation will be dented after this. If she thinks she can involve herself in any way with the Sussexes without being Markled, she's mistaken. Her libel of TM Snr is no better than the Ho's smearing of people, and in doing this George has been contaminated by the Sussexes though she thinks she's too clever to be damaged.
** Not Bower and Low
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 29
So Nigeria is safe to go to, but not the UK? 🤔

I’m beginning to think that she cannot come her for legal reasons or maybe because she would have to face the music about her fake pregnancies and fake kids.
And this 👇

View attachment 2905098
Someone - can't recall who - said she would be served (with judicial papers) if she sees foot in England... Anyone knows about this?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 25
.
One of the things that pisses me off about Georgie's recent videos on the Moonbump Mess is that for years she ignored ALL the comments and ire of thousands of commenters on social media and even on her channel, trying to get her to pick it up. Worse, she said (to Dan I believe) that she used to think of us plebs as mere 'conspiracy theorists'.

She had a Damascene conversion a few months ago when she actually bothered to look at the photographic evidence and accompanying circumstances.

Now, she's sounding like a born-again believer, and taken up the position of Doyenne of the Dollies Crusade. Getting all aerated and on her high horse about exactly the issues we were all seriously considering and trying to discuss logically for 4-5 years on e.g. YT, which very often got us banned or censored.
Now, she's urging us all to write to the Palace like she's in charge of a righteous campaign!
She's standing on the shoulders of giants who originally unearthed the Moonbump Mess. Some of whom got very hurt by what the stoats' chums in and on social media did to them.

At the same time, she's cooked up a rationale for how the Palace et al couldn't possibly have had anything to do with whatever went on, is going on. Chuck did nothing wrong, the Royals are all innocent blah blah. All their staff were too stupid, didn't catch on to the stoat's shenanigans, and didn't tell the BRF anything.

It's a bit weird that she dragged Edward IV into it, en passant, to no particular effect. As an amateur family historian, he's on my list of unsolved puzzles. This past week, I've spent several hours digging around him. On Friday, for my own interest, with ref to Edward and his younger brother, I laid out a case for why it would benefit today's Palace et al to surreptitiously fan the embers of the Moonbump Mess. (I'll get round to posting a precis soon. I wish I could write fiction! It'd make a cracking novel! A movie even).

Point is that when these people are your ancestors, you learn from them (unless you're Hazno). It's a matter of dynastic survival and there's so very much to lose, so you learn how to tinker around, cloak and dagger, behind the scenes. It's the genes and lifelong immersion in the micro-culture thing again. You think in terms of centuries, not years and decades.
There are old rules we know about and those we don't (and probably never will).
Nothing much changes.

In this alt narrative, I am inclined to think that the Palace et al were onto Smeg the moment she popped up in Hazno's life. They weren't asleep at the wheel. They're certainly not incompetent! Seriously, the top staff at the Palace are beyond smart, beyond brilliant. Would they really, perversely employ underlings that are complete numpties?!!

I could even argue that these top people were quietly laser-focused on Smeg and the situation from his first call to her. Her obsessive and unseemly behaviour at Skippy's wedding clearly didn't go unnoticed. Who took the photos, why were they let loose several years back...? And why was Lord Geidt, a supreme master in the intelligence world, called back into service to 'help Smeg settle in, show her the ropes'? (What? He's a nanny now?) Why was Major Johnny placed between two former top intel chiefs directly behind the stoats at the jubilee thanksgiving service? Was it only the silly stoats who were wired...?

Could it be that the current status quo, the 'failure' to unroyal the stoats, with all the the incessant whinging and the secret £subs, is a small price to pay for what's been done and the inestimable value of what's been protected?
Compare to the damage they were all set to do within the fold....and let's not forget the risks to the three children. Someone who licks their lips in gleeful anticipation and talks about 'one plane crash away' is not joking, they are profoundly psychopathic and need watching. She and her dimwit sidekick have been at war with our Monarchy and our nations since the day she set foot in NottCott. (Who gives their future sister in law and our nations' future Queen a butcher knife as a present....?)
In the alt narrative, I would argue that the way the Palace et al have gone about saving the Monarchy and our nations, with no bloodshed, is nothing short of genius!

Could it be that Georgie may possibly, literally, be missing the plot here!?
Ah but no! She's so well-connected, she knows much more stuff than we do and she's much smarter than the Palace folks and us. So she must be right.
I'm nobody. I know nothing. Right or wrong, I have nothing to gain. It's just sometimes the light of history can help us see today's puzzles differently - and, regardless of whether we like it or not, even perhaps more realistically?

Yes! Great post! Of course they knew all about her from the beginning. But their courtship, wedding, and ‘departure’ from the UK all occurred during the most favorable time for M to hold their ‘knowledge’ in check. These were the years, here in the States, when the Race Card was flush with power as the Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, George Floyd stories consumed the media and the BLM movement consumed every part of our cultural identity.

How could the RF reject Harry’s bi-racial choice of bride? Imagine how M wouod have played that on both sides of the Atlantic? Yes, the safer course was to appear to accept her with open arms. Meghan won that match-up.

I think they were on to the surrogacy from the start as well. M&H were determined to have ‘their’ child in the LOS…hence the moonbump caper. I think the bullying investigation might have a lot of relevant detail about moonbumps, etc and that is why it will never see the light of day. Maybe that’s also why the Queen’s confidante was stopped from writing a-book, and bought a home instead.

They would have known that M was making preparations, pursuing deals for a return to Hollywood almost right from the start….even as the public believed she was happily ensconced in the RF. That was good news from their standpoint…they believed she/they would soon be off their hands. And sensing her moment, right at the height of BLM’s popularity in 2020 , off goes H&M, launching their new lives by informing Oprah that the RF and the UK in general, is racist or possessed of ‘unconscious bias.’

They immediately immeshed themselves in the Woke culture as spokesmen. She pondered the idea of a political career. Her hectoring podcast, speeches etc…were all aligned politically with the Left, as were Harry’s causes. In such politically volatile times, that was a big mistake…she alienated half of her American base at the get-go. And she dug in deep.

Yes indeed..she dug in. ‘The moving finger writes and having writ…moves on…nor all your piety and wit…can call it back to cancel half a line. Nor all your tears wash out a word of it.”

But NOW no one kneels at the NFL football games anymore. Instead of Beyonce doing a BLM military type half-time show, she’s singing to the red-neck country music crowd. Top Gun was the highest grossing movie of its year. Harry Weinstein just got a new trial. The campus protests are serving to highlight outrageous anti-semitism and reverse racism among the Wokesters. . And the BLM founders have been exposed for having spent millions on themselves rather than restoring the Black communities they burned down.

Subsequently, we have heard nothing from Woke-Sally Annie about the Palestine/Isreali situation…or the Harvey Weinstein reversal, have we? Quiet little mouse.

No, she is busy making friends and jam. The Happy Montecito homemaker.

So perhaps the strategy to ‘let that pony run’ is finally coming to fruition. Perhaps Lady C has kept quiet until now as ‘instructed.” But is pushing the conversation now…because NOW is perceived by the Palace as the right time to let the surrogacy story into broader public domain.

M&H are a brand in severe decline. The children, being largely invisible, have no hold on the public’s affection. And sad as it may be, cancer in the RF has de-fanged them, and switched the bully/victim narrative to be against THEM.

The Palace plays the long game and waits. Is there a plan to cut the lot of them from the LOS. I guess we will have to wait as well to see.
[/QUOTE]

Thank you...an excellent post that pulls a lot of key threads together and expands on the all-important American elements that, coupled with the insanity of wokism and BLM, laid the foundations for the Cable TV actress's brazen, inexorable grift to the pinnacle of society - from which she planned to launch her She-Ra conquest of the US.

Given her paucity of anything approaching the ethics and standards, talent and aptitude, for public life or, indeed, family life, it's astonishing that she got so far. (Frank Abagnale, Bernie Madoff and Elizabeth Holmes are almost also-rans in the con artist league table!)

So, yes, I agree, the Harkles as a marketable proposition are now in swift, severe terminal decline.
Your stanza from Omar Khayyam is so apt! The Rubaiyat was a very favourite book of my dear dad who'd often quote its wisdom and cautions to us. There's a reason we're constrained to not wash our dirty linen in public. This unfolding Harkle TM demise is, at core, a very grim and grisly illustration of why.
Just as the enduring 'Recollections may vary' has entered the common vocabulary, every public utterance of theirs will follow them mercilessly for the rest of their lives.


My primary concern though has always been for any children who may have been entangled and used in this whole debacle. I should think that the Palace and the RF have always had a very close eye on that situation too (or, more likely, several eyes!). However begotten (or borrowed), there's nothing about the situation that convinces me it's a stable, nurturing one for them.

With respect to Georgie, it seems to me that she's rather more of a bit part player than a lead. Leaders are those who have the courage to describe their vision of the future before anyone else even thinks of what possibilities the future may hold.. Then they bravely lead us there. She's a reporter, a raconteur, an opinion-shaper - sometimes as instructed. It's how she earns her crust.

Not least, I want to reiterate that we Brits were genuinely very happy that Haz was marrying a mixed race woman. Personally, at the time, when I obviously knew nothing about his real personality and intellectual issues, I was suggesting to family/friends that it was a genius addition to the RF!
We just don't have the race problems that the US has. In fact, we've probably had some since BLM, the insane wokists and the Cable TV actress stirred things up. She simply made stuff up in her head, to build her victim story to sell to Oprah and Gale on her way to the White House. We can't forgive the horrid slurs she heaped upon us and our RF. She's done so much damage to countless people.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 40
Some great posts today. One thing everyone needs to remember though, Rachel is completely bleeping bonkers.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 53
I looked at this hard.

I suspect money and brownie points.

She always toes the Palace line.
I'm guessing that the Palace people have decided that they're taking another line on the surrogacy/Moonbump Mess.

They now seem to have confected a story, an excuse that 'Well, duh, all us Palace workers are stoopid and we just didn't pay no attention to that nonsense. We just trusted that darling boy and his douchess was telling us the truth.'

That'll be their Get Out of jail Free Card when/if the surrogacy/flatpacks truth comes out. Distancing themselves from all the lies, deceits, manipulations.
Georgie's happy to oblige.
For the Damehood or whatever she's after.
I suspected when we heard about her book "The Truth" that George would be used to lay the groundwork. A mixture of falsehoods and toothless attacks on the Sussexes, disguised as "pulling no punches" may be the result.

The timing was interesting, just when the clamour on SM for the truth became overwhelming. I suspect that she's working to find a middle ground in her book through the constitutional fraud, and her apparent absolving of any blame of the Monarchy would suggest this is the case so far. Wootton's a prop and I'm surprised at him tbh.

BP could pretend they were hoodwinked but this isn't credible as they're worse than the Mafia. There could be some angle of indulgence of the Ho as damaged / infertile, but they need to be careful what they accuse the Sussexes of as the Sussexes could cause them a lot of damage. In return the Stoats will need paying a lot plus other benefits, and the Flatpacks could quietly "disappear" in the US - instead of "wanting to play with their royal cousins" which is just a BS threat and both sides know it. The Ho wants money, not relatives.

The Ho has an impressive arsenal of weapons, and though people say they're sinking they remain buoyant imo because they know the secrets. She could prove that Fark's christening never happened and that the RF colluded, for starters. C & C can't pretend they weren't there or didn't allow their photos to be in the world press. Unfortunately, just in that one, the Cambridges were there too.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
permission to use St Pauls would be given by the Dean , possibly after discussion with the Bishop of London.
It doesn't nee Royal Assent.
Plus the crypt is rented out for conference events...
You can have cocktails around Nelson's tomb if you want...

At which point I really should make the joke about Cardinal Wolsey turning in his grave...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
I hate to hark back, but today I re-watched the Sky TV programme of the African tour, I'm trying to find the girl who said of Meg "she's not even Nigerian" but I think that might have been on the documentary with her whining interview. Harry was a witch to the presenter, so they both managed to embarrass themselves.

Anyway, it only just now struck me about them going their separate ways. At the time I thought that she was left behind in the city (whilst Harry travelled a bit off the beaten track) due to Archie. But really, they could have taken plenty of supplies for him 🤔 so I have two conclusions

1. They were already pandering to her a her wanting to "support girls" and let her do her own tit because they were terrified of her temper.

2. The press wanted that shot of Harry walking in the landmine gear just like his dead mummy and were terrified of her grabbing the vest and headgear and marching off in a pair of shorts, so they purposely kept her away.

But thinking of ANY other Royal tour and the royal couple go to all engagements together? Every single day? No? Why on earth did they do different things on a tour? Completely separately?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 33
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.