Harry & Meghan #433 Meghan Serves Other People's Children Up On A Silver Platter

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I hope this link works but it’s a very interesting read….

And this is Dr Drakes husbands website…

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reactions: 26
Remember that baby doctor who delivered "Harry's daughter"?
The one who closed down her clinic at short notice and abandoning several expectant mothers.
Any further info on where she is and why she shut up shop almost overnight?
Apparently she's back, somewhere else...
Don't know where though...
 
Reactions: 22
Which begs the question why were they let in. There's more to that than meets the eye I'd guess.
It's not pleasant to realise that amidst the RF are a number of people who, in other walks of life, might be called grifters.
I reckon it's always been like that.
I reckon they're quite comfy with this genre.

These sort of people fulfil various purposes otherwise they wouldn't be allowed in.
The ho's purposes were largely optical. Put another way, how long would a white woman have been allowed to lie, cheat, bully and throw tantrums?

Remember her affronted, "I've never been treated like a black woman before!"
When she came into the RF's orbit, they pushed it for every ounce of PR. That's how the UK was led to see her. As much as ho was over the moon about the optics of being led up the aisle by Chuck, so was he.
We're led to believe that Chuck admires her 'tungsten persistence' (aka sociopathy, a key trait of grifters!!).
They didn't seem to care that she was, like most of us of whatever colour, totally unsuitable for the role. Rather like Diana really in other ways!
 
Reactions: 29
This stood out in that St MM piece. Essentially, Dr. Drake perhaps refused to lie for Meghan and folded-up shop!
View attachment 2860043
It is really odd isn’t it? She seemed to have a thriving practice, waiting lists and full client books and then nothing! Why would you choose to close down your life’s work and achievement within a couple of weeks, when you’ve essentially/allegedly delivered a member of royalty?! I don’t understand.
 
Reactions: 45

Lady C's book and SURROGACY Smeg presented an enormous belly as proudly as a water melon seller. The book is forensic. Smeg's conduct during Aldi's gestational period has caused people generally, especially women who have had children, to ask questions. Birkenhead incident was the tipping point - did they want to shut the press down about bullying (bullying of staff was causing consternation at the Palace) or curtail questions about the travelling babybump (freely available on Getty images). Subject important because of line of succession and subsequent attempt to shut down the press. Situation is dangerous and needs to be resolved/handled by TRF in Lady's opinion.

Difference between old and new book? Different photo on cover. New - Smeg has hair scraped back and Manson-llooking eyes and subtitled Persecutors or Victims. Audible not at present unless they decide it will make money.

Harkle lifestyle unsustainable? The Harkles had genuine fame which could not be purchased. They have subverted that and became infamous. They didn't understand that grifting would destroy them.. Smeg will lose any sex appeal and men will be loathe to unsheath their swords. Haz has lost all his physical appeal already and looks as if he has crawled out of the washing machine. Neither has any talent. They will find it difficult to sustain their billionaire lifestyle.
 
Reactions: 49
Apparently, TM Jrs YT vid is now gone! Wonder if the Gruesome’s forced that to happen?
View attachment 2860014
Don't laugh, but she's right. The Ho will say now things have gone tits-up that she was pressurised in some way, racism - this was always her safety net plan.
The injunction or super-injunction was imposed by the Palace to protect themselves and the Sussexes from news of the baby scam leaking.
Imo no way could the Stoats impose a 6-year press embargo in the UK, quite apart from the fact she's an American citizen.
Now's the blame game but the Palace has far more to lose.
 
Reactions: 26
Here’s my take. Dr Drake’s husband was the fertility doc. Maybe he did the zygote planting for Smegs/Surrogate. Then? When the child was born, they said to the wife, “Hey! Sign off on the certificate saying you delivered baby from Smegs!” Maybe Dr Drake said, “Hell no!” So then, they were both threatened w/legal action & both said, “Fuck you, Smegs! We’re outta here!” I don’t know, but this is all getting very spicy!!
 
Reactions: 38
What super injunction?
The Royal Family won't lose fuck-all against the harkles.
We won't see their kids, and our Royals won't see them- and neither will we , thank fuck.
Fuck them , we are well rid of them.
 
Reactions: 38
I agree entirely! I don’t know any reason for it other than a scam such as this. Here if it was tax related then HMRC would show records, there’d be easily findable info. If they or their children were poorly then I understand that but surely you’d have someone come in to manage your practice like they did during the pandemic - she used to do all of her client facing work and appointments on zoom. Maybe they’ve made enough money for the rest of their lives and decided to run off to paradise but surely if that were the case you’d protect such a good reputation and manage your departure, find new cover for your clients and be professional about it?
 
Reactions: 29
And as the post I made from X shows: maybe the RF is complicit in Archie’s birth, but DEFINITELY NOT the other kids!! It’ll be interesting to see if/how the RF responds to this! I also foresee the Harkles putting out some BS to garner sympathy about surrogacy. Fuck the both of you! YOU LIED!! There’s nothing wrong with surrogacy at all, but lying & pretending?!?!?! No sympathy from me!!
I’d also like to say I wish the Gruesome’s lawyers would say, “Fuck off! We’re NOT dealing with this one!!” See ya!!
 
Reactions: 33
But there would have been so much positivity and love for them if they needed IVF/surrogates etc - it would have cemented them into the hearts of pretty much everyone!

that could have then been used to urge change in the LOS, remove stigma and would honestly have made her the only ‘Queen of Hearts’ anyone would remember.

the charity support, the personal support, the normalising of fertility issues and I would have been behind them a million percent - for me personally my fertility journey was a long hard one - why would you lie about this when you could have actually and genuinely changed the world?
 
Reactions: 37
Look like someone we know?


View attachment 2860051
This is a brilliant X post!! Who is JD Eadon, anyone we know, or a pseudonym?

Also a bit confused by the names Stassi, Beau and Hartford! Is Stassi the mother to Hartford? If so, who is Beau?!

Beautiful child, and very definitely looks like she could be one of the Lilis'
 
Reactions: 22
Totally agree! They could have and would have gotten a TON of compassion for it, but I believe they lied about all of it because both were too fixated on having children for the LOS. They probably figured surrogacy wouldn’t qualify them, so they lied. I think the RF probably WOULD have made an exception & allowed them in the LOS if they were surrogate kids, but that’s not how the Gruesomes chose to do things and now it’s all blowing up in their faces…(I’m sorry about your pregnancy struggles, Ami. I couldn’t have babies at all, so I had to opt for being a dog Momma, instead!)
 
Reactions: 37
I don't understand the direction Lady C is taking with some of her statements so far, and she seems to be ignoring a large part of the picture in her portrayal of The Truth, but we'll wait and see what the rest says.

She asks if "they (Harkles)wanted to shut the press down about the bullying of staff ... that was causing consternation at the Palace?" "Subject important because of LoS and subsequent attempt to shut down the press".
I thought the only consternation in the Palace was keeping the bullying secret, as it went on for years? This has already been documented by Low.
The Stoats shutting down the press? No way.
She's misrepresented two important points already and we've not yet seen the book. We already know that the Sussexes are grifters with no talent, and that they threw away a priceless opportunity.
 
Reactions: 28
I hope this works properly. Volume up.


Is he referring to Harold?
 
Reactions: 13
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.