Two thoughts this morning - I am having crazy days at work and usually mornings is when I catch up with my lovely fellow Tattlers.
Yesterday as I watched Catherine once again interacting with children, I thought: well, the ILBW never looks at ease with children, specially if they are random/anonymous children. Also, before meeting the ILBW, Hazno spoke a lot about his relationship with George and I do believe that he would be the fun uncle. That relationship never translated to his girlfriend and then wife. All the interactions of the ILBW with Royal children were odd, and there's obviously the Charlotte and Charlotte's dress story. The only children she seemed comfortable with were the Mulroney children and that girl that people say it's her daughter. To be fair I don't think she is her daughter, but I really think she never liked children except as props. So, I don't think she ever wanted to be a mother, other than to have the cute props. Even if there are children and even if they are born out of her, it wouldn't surprise me they were being raised by nannies and she really doesn't care about them: it would be perfectly on brand.
And then speaking of "brand": it is funny that she was going to hit the ground running, and learn really fast, and work studiously hard - as an ex-nerdy smart girl - and now the likes of Spotify and Netflix are getting rid of them not only because they fail to be interesting but mostly because they fail to deliver actual work on time. I am always puzzled by her paradox: she is so transparently bad, stupid, self-centred, that I really don't get how she usually gets away with everything. Getting a dimwit for a husband - evening that is a prince - ok, he is a dimwit; but convincing the Oprahs, Gayles, Tyler Perrys, that though not honest nor actually good people, are really smart, that really leaves me baffled.