Can anybody on here confirm this is actually in that book. If it is then yes, I have fears for his mental health. He’s definitely
Can anybody on here confirm this is actually in that book. If it is then yes, I have fears for his mental health. He’s definitelyJust been over on Tumblr and found a post containing and discussing this gem.
Did he seriously, honestly write this in Waaagh!?
“I was born in a private hospital in 1984 to the most popular woman in the world, and her husband, who is now the King. The world waited with bated breath to hear the news and it made the headlines everywhere. I have dated some of the most attractive women in the world. I served to great acclaim in the army. I became the most popular member of the Royal Family, but I clearly had to stand back from public life in a country that so clearly adored me.”
Please let it be a joke and it's not real. Nobody could write that about themselves with a straight face, could they?
I saw in the No Idea that Harry was thinking about buying Taylor Swift's London house, but I try not to read articles about the Harkles and it's the No Idea so, who knows?Harold seems to have stayed at a private members' club (Soho House?) while in the UK for his court case. They don't want to stay at BP with its constant renovations, and are angry that KC provided AK with a house.
They want one too, in the UK, with security and staffing. If not, they could slow down their move out of Frogmore Cottage.
I thought they'd already moved out and KC had given the keys to PA?
What's the betting KC gets them a house, far grander than Frogmore? I'd bet my house he will, there are loads to choose from.
*grins wickedly as finger hovers over ignore button*Thanks for telling us what your dealing with Zippy and sharing it, you've not had an easy time recently but we're here supporting you xxx
Hope you're home now Tattling and eating biscuits.
From @Cocobean9 " @ChaoticArtist ... to make people "disappear" click on their avatar and there's an ignore button"
Nooooooooohere's my avatar, don't ignore me by mistake!
View attachment 2235612
I knew that @TickTickTick didn't mean Spitz the dog, knew exactly what she meant but just branched out a bit...didn't mean to cause any confusion.
I just searched for the quote and this article came up, so I think it's the columnist paraphrasing some of Waagh.Can anybody on here confirm this is actually in that book. If it is then yes, I have fears for his mental health. He’s definitelydelusional. Who actually writes that about themselves. ‘A country that so clearly adored me’ ffs. He was a little git from childhood to adulthood and only the ‘clown Prince’ tag gave him a free pass, some thinking Harry is a naughty boy, he’s just like us! No he wasn’t. He was a spoiled, over indulged, precocious child who grew into the same in adulthood. He needs to shut the fuck up for a while…
That's absolutely hilariousJulie Burchill in the Spectator.
The downfall of Prince Harry
Prince Harry posed as a steel-true and blade-straight campaigner for truth and justice in his hacking case against Mirror Group Newspaperswww.spectator.co.uk
And the Crown estate BELONGS to the CROWN and the monarchy NOT the BRITISH GOVERNMENT or THE BRITISH PEOPLE one of the reasons it was created was To avoid bankrupting the country
I think this is what BookWorm means. I don't know if there are different versions of birth certificates, but this one for Ffark hasn't been completed properly by the look of it because there's a space and it's got a line through it.Umm…no they don’t? My first married name isn’t recorded on the birth certificates of my younger two children, only my maiden name. I was only ever asked for my maiden name.
Her name wasn’t Engelson when she married Harold. Her name was restored to Markle when her marriage to Trevor was dissolved. It’s in the divorce decree.I think this is what BookWorm means. I don't know if there are different versions of birth certificates, but this one for Ffark hasn't been completed properly by the look of it because there's a space and it's got a line through it.
Maybe someone savvy can shed some light.
(““maiden surname”, in relation to a woman means the surname under which she contracted her marriage (or, where she has married more than once, her first marriage),”
This Birth certificate should show the maiden name plus any other married names, here
Engelson because that was her name when she married the Stoat.
This certificate from Harper's Bazaar shows that where it says "surname at marriage if different to maiden name:, there's a line through it and nothing written. This should have Engelson. Why has it been omitted? From this, it was her first marriage but it was possibly her third.
In the section where it says that you "certify the above particulars are true", etc., there is no signature, just the typed word "Harry". No surname, meaningless.
View attachment 2235702
Hope you are OK Zippy! Feel better soon.I am in A&E gp sent me here my blood pressure is sky high and my pulse is super fast just waiting for blood tests to be do e but I suspect I will kept in
Would her occupation be described as “princess of the UK”??I think this is what BookWorm means. I don't know if there are different versions of birth certificates, but this one for Ffark hasn't been completed properly by the look of it because there's a space and it's got a line through it.
Maybe someone savvy can shed some light.
(““maiden surname”, in relation to a woman means the surname under which she contracted her marriage (or, where she has married more than once, her first marriage),”
This Birth certificate should show the maiden name plus any other married names, here
Engelson because that was her name when she married the Stoat.
This certificate from Harper's Bazaar shows that where it says "surname at marriage if different to maiden name:, there's a line through it and nothing written. This should have Engelson. Why has it been omitted? From this, it was her first marriage but it was possibly her third.
In the section where it says that you "certify the above particulars are true", etc., there is no signature, just the typed word "Harry". No surname, meaningless.
View attachment 2235702
Full versionI think this is what BookWorm means. I don't know if there are different versions of birth certificates, but this one for Ffark hasn't been completed properly by the look of it because there's a space and it's got a line through it.
Maybe someone savvy can shed some light.
(““maiden surname”, in relation to a woman means the surname under which she contracted her marriage (or, where she has married more than once, her first marriage),”
This Birth certificate should show the maiden name plus any other married names, here
Engelson because that was her name when she married the Stoat.
This certificate from Harper's Bazaar shows that where it says "surname at marriage if different to maiden name:, there's a line through it and nothing written. This should have Engelson. Why has it been omitted? From this, it was her first marriage but it was possibly her third.
In the section where it says that you "certify the above particulars are true", etc., there is no signature, just the typed word "Harry". No surname, meaningless.
View attachment 2235702
Me too.Umm…no they don’t? My first married name isn’t recorded on the birth certificates of my younger two children, only my maiden name. I was only ever asked for my maiden name.
I think so too. Also the radio silence on this in the UK media is odd. They are obsessed with people's weight and looks. The absence of headlines like "DoE looking frail after his mothers death" makes me think he is having some health issues and out of respect, it is not mentioned. And maybe not to alarm people. But yes, I worry about the DoE.I still think Prince Edward looks unwell.
Umm…no they don’t? My first married name isn’t recorded on the birth certificates of my younger two children, only my maiden name. I was only ever asked for my maiden name.
My 1st marriage is recorded. so I suppose it depends on the registrar.Me too.
The Wales children’s birth certificates list Catherine’s occupation as Princess of the United Kingdom, so I guess that’s what they put. You can’t help but begrudge it to ILBW though.Would her occupation be described as “princess of the UK”??
Dissolved means divorced so you still have to add in other surnames (if asked).Her name wasn’t Engelson when she married Harold. Her name was restored to Markle when her marriage to Trevor was dissolved. It’s in the divorce decree.
It seems fishy to me that the bike shop can't donate a few bikes without doing a fundraiser I mean they gave Archie a free bike yet they won't donate a few bikes to underprivileged children without asking for donations yeah something is definitely not adding up and the bike shop claims that they have made charitable donations before yet they have no evidence of this on any of their social media accounts unless I have missed this. Personally, I don't think the bike store owner's wife helped in this situation as she posted the thank you note thinking that it would raise the store's profile and get people to buy bikes off them when in actual fact many people saw it as a massive kick in the face to children who are underprivileged and don't even have a bike and then she chastised her paying customers because they don't send thank you notes after they have brought a bike from the shop.‘don’t think poorly of me for not believing this. Whole thing was a scam.
I called bullshit when Harry said his family was the family she never had back in 2017This! This was when I started to have real arguments to dislike her - until then It was only her permanent smirk. She had a big family: brothers, nieces and nephews, cousins, aunts and uncles, and no one, NO ONE, got an invite. Instead, she invited celebrities she didn't even knew. This in itself spoke volumes about her character, who she is, what is really important for her. She started to play the narrative when she spent the Christmas with the family - "I always wanted a big family" - and the moment she had then Prince Charles walk her down the aisle, that's when she felt the most successful con in the world.
A year later she couldn't be bothered to spend Christmas or Summers with "big family she had always dreamt of", she couldn't care less about Prince Charles for anything except to get money for overly expensive, ill fitting clothes and tasteless mansions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?