Harry & Meghan #353 No guns for hire for the ginger, ducking liar.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
This is the worst by far for me. It is all wrong...shape fabric just everything. ACK! You couldn't pay me enough to wear this tbf.
I actually don't think this is too bad - especially compared to the other horrors she wears.

I have to admit, I'm not that good at picking out clothes for myself. I've packed on the weight during covid and like covid, it ain't going away

But - ive started a new job and keep getting comments on my "lovely dresses" most of this stuff is bought out of either tesco or sainsburys Maybe Migraine would be better shopping there.
 
Reactions: 37
I have to say Laura has done very good investigative work into the Netflix documentary as it looks like every picture was either staged, not taken at the place where they said the photo was taken from or was heavily photoshopped. IMO I think a lot of the videos and still pictures from the documentary have been AI generated and that they have also been messing with deepfakes to make it look like them when in reality it wasn't really them.
 
Reactions: 36
It was widely reported that Catherine had HG with all her pregnancies that left her hospitalised. She also appeared on the happymumhappybaby podcast talking about her early motherhood experiences.
Also we see her actually interact with her children.
 
Reactions: 37
It looks like a Transformation Challenge from Sewing Bee where you have to make a garment from a vintage shower curtain then attach random trimming around the sleeve that you have dug out of an old British Home Stores carrier bag.
Absolutely spot on! (P.s. I love Sewing Bee )
---
Awww, Sainsbury's stuff is actually quite decent, they make good styles. Maybe Meghan could take some inspiration.
 
Reactions: 21
If Harold is to remain a Counsellor of State he has to have a domicile in the UK, so it's likely this has been organised for him and he has an official home here. If he's domiciled here will this affect the visa investigation by Heritage Foundation? I think the Biden administration's stonewalling will have been at the request of the British government, but it doesn't make the US look good at all. The RF won't want Harold's visa lies to be exposed. Everyone here has a lot to lose, and they'll have to come up with something for Heritage.
The press are talking about divorce as though it's already in the pipeline. We just don't know, and though the Harkles seem separate I think they are working as a team but remotely. If there is a divorce his domicile here will be a factor, but I don't know near enough about this sort of stuff.
 
Reactions: 24
I'm in the UK and my lot have baptism certificates, which has probably been answered as I'm only up to page 6. Took some time away from the internet and I've been trying to catch up with the schofield threads. I've admitted defeat there,

I'm behind with what the overseas 2 have been up to. I need to start following the news a bit more.
 
Reactions: 17
The Heritage Foundation, any other foundation, private persons, activists or anyone else, should not be able to investigate the Harkles, any diplomat or any other Royal anywhere.

The Harkles should be investigated by whichever official US body is in charge of this.
Since this isn't the case, there are indicators that the US government and the official body have no problems with Harry's residence or are supporting it.
Even US Green Card holders can own property in US.
Also holding a job, even a smoke and mirrors one.
He never lost a ''domiciled'' status. Hence him constantly publicly mentioning Britain, and having security when present. It just a ''spin'' that he did. Like Charles ''change'' of counsellors without a single change, by using older letters pattent.
He can get away with a mailbox adress for that.
 
Reactions: 21
Happy Birthday to you and all us old ‘uns. I’ll be 77 in August and don’t think I’ll ever be more than ‘member’ !
it’s such a good diversion on here to know others have the same low opinion of H and M.
 
Reactions: 32
While I appreciate all the work that has been put into research, I can't help thinking that a fundamental error has been made. The Frogmore Cottage windows in the colour pictures all seem to be single outward openers, in the B&W picture ILBW is standing in front of a bifold, inward opening window.
 
Reactions: 19
I’ve been lurking around on the Schofield threads and lookee here.
Oh, dearie me. Has Carolyn McCall, who took Smeg’s side against Piers Morgan and sacked him, just been Markled?
Also Schofield has been dropped as ambassador for the Prince’s Trust.



 
Reactions: 29
Yeah, I don't believe that the photo was taken inside Frogmore Cottage and even Laura has pointed out that the windows are not the same which makes it obvious that this photo was taken elsewhere but the question is where was this photo taken if it wasn't Frogmore Cottage?
 
Reactions: 22
Oooh!
It was Williams car she was snooping around at the polo!

OOOH!! I always wondered why on earth security would chase her away from her husband's car...knowing it was WIlliam's makes so much sense...although I question why it took 5 years for this information to com eout
 
Reactions: 33
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.