Well you couldn't have put it better! Whatever the reason for the no-show of the Flatpacks, it isn't a good and honest one on the part of the RF and the Harkles, and no question this fiasco has been enabled by the Palace.I am on the fence about flatpickers. What real proof do we have that they do exist? Birth certificates- meh. Questionable photo of TQ in a ratty cardigan and PP looking at a shawl wrapped lump dressed in outfits recently photographed at a horse show, Christening photo for farchie very suspect. No Christening pic for lilibucks. We do have a bouncing bump, a bump which slid to her kness in the purple dress and evidence of impossibly deep, legs close togather squats in heels while 'heavily' pregnant. Blurry photos, photoshopped photos and weird/incongruous videos of kids that seem to have no connection to their 'parents'. And a history of lies, manipulation, more lies and the vindictive, furiously destructive nature of mr and mrs reek. Until I see real proof either way, I shall remain sitting on the fence.
There can be no possible reason to hide the children by a man who exposes his todger and invades everybody's privacy. I think the concept of privacy is totally alien to them. But they have to come up with a reason for hiding the Flatpacks, so "hatred of the press / paranoia / privacy" will do because it falls into the victim narrative, reminds everyone that his mummy died, and gives the totally bogus impression that this tragic tosspot is making one last heroic stand. Dying on a hill etc., drawing the line... my babies!!!.
This from a couple who re-enacted his mother's death in a car. I don't believe the privacy excuse at all.