And there you’ve said exactly what I’m thinking! My children WILL watch the coronation because it’s history, it’s a point in time they’ll remember. I took them up to London for the queens funeral for the same reason - it’s a HUGE DEAL! And yet aldi and Lidl don’t deserve that inclusion somehow. It’s so sad.I don’t know what sort of arrangement the British press has with the Royal Family, but surely there is some ambitious US investigative reporter who could tackle the issue of the possible children. This could be Pulitzer prize material regardless of how it’s resolved. It seems that questions are multiplying, not disappearing. I still can’t imagine, if the children exist, not taking them to the coronation.
She’s still feeling very self-anointed to me. I think MM does just fine for when she’s in her homeland.I wonder if maybe it’s not a shade. Probably how her name should be officially refered to in the US as she is US citizen. At least someone got it right. Or maybe it’s because it was one moment only thing, not something she could have 10 times edited and consulted as we see in the media (as we’ve seen in past all the “updates” to Duchess)
Are there any investigative reporters left any more? Either in the UK or the US? The media is controlled by a very small group of people and that's true in both of our countries. They decide what gets reported on which is why some companies are allowed to get away with murder and nothing said. I don't even bother reading the mainstream news any more. I don't believe a word of what they publish. Of course, I might be being cynicalI don’t know what sort of arrangement the British press has with the Royal Family, but surely there is some ambitious US investigative reporter who could tackle the issue of the possible children. This could be Pulitzer prize material regardless of how it’s resolved. It seems that questions are multiplying, not disappearing. I still can’t imagine, if the children exist, not taking them to the coronation.
Why would she not want her kids to experience it?And there you’ve said exactly what I’m thinking! My children WILL watch the coronation because it’s history, it’s a point in time they’ll remember. I took them up to London for the queens funeral for the same reason - it’s a HUGE DEAL! And yet aldi and Lidl don’t deserve that inclusion somehow. It’s so sad.
So part of the Archewell mission is to restore trust in public information?Meghan Markle is back with a swanky new 'Rich Mom Energy' look
ALISON BOSHOFF: During the release of Spare in January - and the publicity tour undertaken by Prince Harry - she was not at her husband's side at all.www.dailymail.co.uk
Just seen this
She's not welcome and she knows it.What is the real reason?
How would anyone believe that the outspoken MM would ever get pushed into a surrogacy, presumably for race-based reasons? That just doesn’t play given MM’s intent to reform the monarchy. And we’re not talking about a quickie little white lie - this would have been months of packing a pillow and a lifetime of lies. If I were betting and there were one or two surrogacies, I’d wager that MM’s biological clock had stopped but she still recognized the need for the ties that bind. All of this is, of course, easily resolved with a little DNA, assuming one wants it resolved.Thisis what I am concerned about. Either smegs, Harold or possibly even KC3 will look to blame the Queen for not revealing the surrogacy. For The King, it is a way out, possibly. For smegs or Harold, it might be hard to claim racism (since they already denied it) but could point at unconscious bias (or whatever the hell they're calling it now).
Either way, it's going to be ugly IMO.
this is exactly it @Chita. I’ve flown my children to the other side of the world for surprise parties for their grandparents let alone a coronation! Milestone birthdays and anniversary’s - my dads in oz and yes flying small children that far is a ball ache BUT it’s what you do, surely? Let alone to see a grandparent anointed as king! There aren’t enough wild horses in the world that would keep me away from that. It’s really, really odd. Why aren’t the press at large picking this up and unravelling it?Aren't there some French journalists looking into Archewell?
Thats a start.
---
Why would she not want her kids to experience it?
Archie could have a nice Birthday in the UK so the excuse given isn't good enough.
What is the real reason?
Tom Cruise can’t get enough of Catherine, Princess of Wales! Remember the premier?!Tom Cruise and Dame Joan Collins just announced as being part of the coro concert.
Amiyaya, are you being waved?! Or maybe you can't say...So. When you leave/retire a force such as police/fire/army you are asked if you’ll stay on for ‘waves’ and within a certain time frame you are required for a wave.
waves are being invoked.
If her eggs and his sperm were used, there will be a DNA match.How would anyone believe that the outspoken MM would ever get pushed into a surrogacy, presumably for race-based reasons? That just doesn’t play given MM’s intent to reform the monarchy. And we’re not talking about a quickie little white lie - this would have been months of packing a pillow and a lifetime of lies. If I were betting and there were one or two surrogacies, I’d wager that MM’s biological clock had stopped but she still recognized the need for the ties that bind. All of this is, of course, easily resolved with a little DNA, assuming one wants it resolved.
Yes Alison Boshoff she is never out of the news but only because you so-called journalists never stop writing about her. Not because she's done anything noteworthy, you just regurgitate her PR drivel and play right in to her narc hands. Give it a rest luv.Meghan Markle is back with a swanky new 'Rich Mom Energy' look
ALISON BOSHOFF: During the release of Spare in January - and the publicity tour undertaken by Prince Harry - she was not at her husband's side at all.www.dailymail.co.uk
Just seen this
That’s hilarious - I don’t think they meant that to look so much like a mug shot!7 days to go Tattlers!
This time next week we'll be watching it
---
That's her 'tell.'Yes, it’s obvious from this still from the video that something threw them. This is her exact expression and hand wringing thing she does when something makes her uncomfortable.
They definitely heard the boos. Good.
View attachment 2135786
I don't remember the press ever referring to Diana by her made name after she married Charles. Baffles me why they insist on doing this with Catherine.Glad to see comments on twitter like this, did not read the article as I don’t click on articles with headlines that still call her by her maiden name.
View attachment 2135700
Neither look happy. She looks dumped that they haven’t had a screaming fan type reaction.Yes, it’s obvious from this still from the video that something threw them. This is her exact expression and hand wringing thing she does when something makes her uncomfortable.
They definitely heard the boos. Good.
View attachment 2135786
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?