I just posted the same as you, and meant to add in my post that the Stoat I guess will be front row in uniform not much different in status to William. A deal, and the whole thing was about the Flatpacks, it always was. The RF have paid a very high price for their folly and cowardice in terms of stress and damage suffered.My hubs who has no love for the monarchy, is convinced that Harry will be allowed to wear a uniform and he will be on the balcony. I wonder if there isn’t something to this. Perhaps The King wanted him to be present for optics and he caved to these two requests. The trade off was that the wife stayed home. I think they really didn’t want her. As far as th kids are concerned no one cares that much about them for them to be a bargaining point. They would be too young to be seen anyway. ,
It was Kelly Rutherford from Gossip Girl.If Haz appears on the balcony, smeg will be furious. I don't think he'll be on the balcony to be honest. I think it's being made very clear to him that he's no longer a working royal and therefore doesn't get the perks.
Something that came to mind though. There was a custody case in the States, where the American mother had filed charges against the foreign husband, I think for drugs so that he wouldn't be allowed back in the country. It backfired on her when the judge announced that since the father couldn't access the States, then the children would have to live with him. And the mother could visit his country to see them. I think they were filthy rich or something but can't remember anymore details. Do you think smeg might know about this case?
They wouldn't be included anyway - far too young.I know we think the children aren’t real or born from a surrogate but at the same time they are(ish) Charlie’s grandchildren and how are they going to see it when they’re older and they weren’t there, ok they wouldn’t remember the occasion but they’d know they weren’t included and good luck telling them why Meagain And Hasnoballs.
The Princess of Wales couldn't give a flying fuckDM again - Elizabeth Haigh throwing Kate under the bus - seems to be a theme lately...
Kate would be 'uncomfortable' if Meghan attended coronation
Prince Harry's solo attendance at the King's Coronation in London next month will leave the royal family 'relieved' and avoid making the Princess of Wales 'uncomfortable', experts say.www.dailymail.co.uk
The facts speak for themselves. There has been rumours she had a hysterectomy aged 28 not sure how true that is. The photos of her pregnancies where she is clearly wearing moon bumps which slipped at times. You can look back on threads or Google these images. The reborn doll they presented to the world as 2 day old Archie. Photoshopped photos of christening and of HMTLQ and HMTLDOE gazing at the doll. Photoshopped images of Lilibets 1st birthday hence her nickname princess nolegs. No in the wild sightings of them with the children only orchestrated images on NF of children which are rumoured to be children of friends or child actors. Lots of images of her carrying small kid in slings that are obviously reborn dolls with dangling legs. Google Gavin Gringas. (Archie) and Rebecca Cord (Lilibet). Lots out there if you look in the right places. Reports from visitors that there is no sign of children in their home such as toys food etc. hope that helps. At the end of the day you have to make up your own mind. The final thing for me is them not coming for the coronation. Those saying they weren’t invited, that’s the actual ceremony. There could be other occasions where they could have presented the children to King and country. As for how long they can keep up the pretence, I think that’s debatable. They’ve done it for the last few years and not a peep in the press. I doubt the marriage will last much longer and her and the invisibles will disappear into oblivion.Sorry if this has been asked and covered before.. but has there been any talk about how if this is true, they're planning to keep up this lie? If one of them kicks the bucket, they know we'd expect the children to be at the funeral. (Or would they not care at that point?)
The children in the documentary.. actors?
How many times can she misspell duchess?! Surely every time she types dutchess, a red squiggly line appears?
Like Candance Owens said about Smeg. "She has been escaping her blackness for her entire life until it could be used for her advantage"Twitter seems to be congratulating Meghan for being so strong and for not bowing down to the racist royal family.
There are some seriously mentally unwell people on that site
Al, my heartthrob for 45+ yearshttps://giphy.com/3o7buhTSqbV1eufFAY Charles to Harold
I thought lnvisibet was Stassi Schroeders girl?The facts speak for themselves. There has been rumours she had a hysterectomy aged 28 not sure how true that is. The photos of her pregnancies where she is clearly wearing moon bumps which slipped at times. You can look back on threads or Google these images. The reborn doll they presented to the world as 2 day old Archie. Photoshopped photos of christening and of HMTLQ and HMTLDOE gazing at the doll. Photoshopped images of Lilibets 1st birthday hence her nickname princess nolegs. No in the wild sightings of them with the children only orchestrated images on NF of children which are rumoured to be children of friends or child actors. Lots of images of her carrying small kid in slings that are obviously reborn dolls with dangling legs. Google Gavin Gringas. (Archie) and Rebecca Cord (Lilibet). Lots out there if you look in the right places. Reports from visitors that there is no sign of children in their home such as toys food etc. hope that helps. At the end of the day you have to make up your own mind. The final thing for me is them not coming for the coronation. Those saying they weren’t invited, that’s the actual ceremony. There could be other occasions where they could have presented the children to King and country.
I think that's a spoof account, like Titania McGrathHow many times can she misspell duchess?! Surely every time she types dutchess, a red squiggly line appears?
Well, technically the coronation is not at the Palace, so it’s still right. Also, you could alwaxs claim it’s YOUR TRUTH!Well my title is half right.
This photo - was it one of their final engagements pre Megxit? Was this the event where she/they stood up for an ovation that wasn’t for them or something? What’s the context? Because around that time they seemed so smug and yet what was going on under the surface?
I have been a flatpack truther for quite a while now, but the fact that the children aren't coming to the coronation is further prove for me that they don't exist because if they did surely Harry and Meghan would not want them missing out on a big event like this.The final thing for me is them not coming for the coronation. Those saying they weren’t invited, that’s the actual ceremony. There could be other occasions where they could have presented the children to King and country.
Countdown to absolute self immolation and/or combustion?!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?