either way, she was a victim.
either way, she was a victim.So....
Did she jump or was she pushed? (invited and declined or not invited at all?)
How will the British public accept having a new Prince and Princess (decreed by law) that have never been seen and as far as we know, have never visited this island? What was once excused as privacy now looks a lot more like subterfuge. At some point the government are going to have to intervene and put an end to whatever the scam is.
BIBThanks for the answers! I did a quick Google search on it just now (you know like how Meghan Googled Harry even though she didn't Google him before the blind date that wasn't a blind date after all) and yes, there are all kinds of theories.
I think I'm leaning towards the surrogacy one for Lillibet. I do think she was pregnant with Archie, this might sound mean but she never got her figure back after that, like some do. Her face, especially her nose was quite swollen too. But either way, she's not coming here for the coronation
I think the one thing we can be sure of…he will be high as a kite at the CorrieI wonder if he will do that fake cheery thing that he did at the unveiling of the statue.
I don't know how the rest of the family can bear to even look at him, tbh.
Happening right now…not waiting for coronation.That news has made my day! I might now have 2 glasses (bottles) of prosecco on coronation day!
Kelly Rutherford! She accused her husband Daniel Giersch of being an arms dealer (he made his money by starting a delivery company called G-mail…many years later Google had to pay him massive amounts of money to use the term in Europe!) The judge ruled that she could travel to see the kids but he couldn’t. He settled with the kids in Monaco, providing her with a house, car and 12 round trip tickets. She tried to keep the kids here after one summer visitation, claiming that it was their right as Americans to not be forced to live in the third world squalor of Monaco…and lost all visitation in the US. It was a glorious summer of 2015 as this all unfolded!If Haz appears on the balcony, smeg will be furious. I don't think he'll be on the balcony to be honest. I think it's being made very clear to him that he's no longer a working royal and therefore doesn't get the perks.
Something that came to mind though. There was a custody case in the States, where the American mother had filed charges against the foreign husband, I think for drugs so that he wouldn't be allowed back in the country. It backfired on her when the judge announced that since the father couldn't access the States, then the children would have to live with him. And the mother could visit his country to see them. I think they were filthy rich or something but can't remember anymore details. Do you think smeg might know about this case?
Did she collect that award she paid for? Might have been her last appearance but actually I don’t recall any photos from that event so you might be right.Genuine question: when was she last seen? I haven't heard of her doing an interview or being papped since Spare came out?
It's just possible that if she's in hiding, they're planning to spring another totally-carried-naturally-by-Megs baby on us and say she was preggo all this time?
It was never a negotiation. It was one side demanding and the other ignoring or just saying "no". I am sure there was blackmailing as well, "put me in the balcony or...".It does make me think that the 'negotiations' we kept hearing about may actually have been true (not the singing happy birthday bit lol).
But he isn’t The Duke anymore, he is Smurf-knob, Duke of Sussex.The government won't intervene, and IF the Ho and Cartons don't attend this may be the way this issue is finally put to bed. The RF likely negotiated a deal with the Stoats, maybe with $$$ too. KC might have threatened to amend the Letters Patent and strip the Flatpacks of their titles. The Removal of Titles Bill is going through Parliament, and William will be on the Throne at some stage. The gap between HM dying and William taking the Throne is when the Stoats must cement their position.
The last thing Chuck needed was a bewigged Gavin Gingras lookalike and Rebecca Cord on stumps being photoshopped around Windsor while he's having oil put on him. This could be what the Stoats threatened.
It doesn't matter that she's not coming, it's just one day. What matters is this.
"A palace spokesman said: 'Buckingham Palace is pleased to confirm that The Duke of Sussex will attend the Coronation Service at Westminster Abbey on 6th May. The Duchess of Sussex will remain in California with Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet."
Princess Archie and Princess Lilibet. The fraud babies keep their fraud titles and place in the LoS. The Stoats keep their own Duke & Duchess of Sussex titles. In exchange the Ho stays away and keeps quiet. Possibly this wording was agreed with the Stoats to mention Prince Ffarke and Princess Legless "remaining with their mother" the Duchess in LA. Maybe a sweet nod to Fffarrke on his birthday via the RF website.
It's all lies, and they all know that it's all lies but this is a plausible way out.
What matters is that the fraud of the children whether surrogate or not will be concealed once and for all by the Palace, who should never have given them titles or put them in the LoS in the first place.
If this happens, we may never know the truth despite people like the determined BookWorm digging for us. I'm sorry that some people are fed up of her. I don't think she's lost the plot at all, and think the whole Flatpack situation stinks. Not one member of our own worthy press pack has ever queried anything about either the Sussex criminal activities or their dodgy Flatpacks, or made the slightest attempt to expose them, the Stoat's drugs or their charity thefts. For this I take my hat off to her.
That’ll be because the palace know they don’t exist.The children were not invited.
I believe your second option. That would be a way of getting headlines that would overpower the Coronation. But that Twitter profile is a notoriously liar, who loves to throw fire at the Internet - with no sources but the voices in their head.i'm putting my 10 bob on that. the Late Queen couldn't do that, but Charles can and I'm thinking there is a legal process in the works.
edit: or she might come out and clean on Corrie and admit the scam of the flatpacks.
urban dictionary synonyms for “markling that particular someone”Although Tequila Ted snubbed him as H&M were about to leave after the funeral. The old 'push the spectacles up' ploy
View attachment 2095247
I thought they declared her to humbly be named "lily"?
May 6th I reckonAm I the only one wondering when we will get episode two of the Oprah liefest starring Walmart Wallis and her “truth” as to why she wasn’t in attendance at the Coronation? Supporting cast Tylenol, Scabies and cushions for the sobbing on the floor moments ….
Seriously, she is a narcissist and she is not going to go quietly
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?