I dont know what the latest on the HO case is, but at Frogmore there was top security provided by the RF. With terminating the lease, KC dealt with the security issue by offering them rooms in BP instead also with top security, so the HO case would fall away. I understood that the HO case was about security in the UK only, and that the Stoat's issue was that RAVEC hadn't given him an opportunity to deal with or consult the Committee about their conclusions.This is what I’m trying to get to the bottom of. Is he trying to get the UK a taxpayer to fund his security while he takes mushrooms in LA, or is it just security when he’s back in the UK?
Can anyone clarify?
ETA: Sorry if this is a basic witch question but the legal doc I found re the Home Office court case seems to refer only to his security while in the UK (which he seems not to be eligible for as not a working royal so not representing the Queen/UK). Is there anything else in the works or have they just mumped and moaned about it like the deluded self-important cretins they are?
Why would the Stoats pay visits to the UK in the future? I csn't see it and it's all very unclear but as usual there's stuff going on behind the scenes.